| Literature DB >> 31434567 |
Xiaobo Gao1, Shun Guo1, Song Zhang1, An Liu1, Lei Shi2, Yan Zhang3.
Abstract
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported errors in Fig. 5. The ROS picture of low dose Marine intervention group in Fig. 5d was used incorrectly, which was caused by the error of the storage path of the picture in the experiment. It was not discovered in time due to the approximation of the two graphs. In addition, the label of middle dose Marine intervention group in Fig. 5a was omitted.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31434567 PMCID: PMC6702714 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-2020-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 5Effect of Mat on mitochondrial activation, ROS production and apoptosis in PA-induced L02 cells. The L02 cells were treated with PA (500 μM), Mat (200, 400, 800 μM) or the combination of PA (500 μM) and Mat (200, 400, 800 μM) for 12 h. a Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) imaging (×400). b JC-1 fluorescence and c DCF fluorescence detected by fluorescence spectrophotometer. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. Control, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 vs. PA. d ROS imaging (×400). e apoptosis analyzed by flow cytometry. f Expression of cleaved caspase 3, p–c-jun and NF-κB in L02 cells. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
Fig. 5Effect of Mat on mitochondrial activation, ROS production and apoptosis in PA-induced L02 cells. The L02 cells were treated with PA (500 μM), Mat (200, 400, 800 μM) or the combination of PA (500 μM) and Mat (200, 400, 800 μM) for 12 h. a Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) imaging (×400). b JC-1 fluorescence and c DCF fluorescence detected by fluorescence spectrophotometer. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. Control, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 vs. PA. d ROS imaging (×400). e apoptosis analyzed by flow cytometry. f Expression of cleaved caspase 3, p–c-jun and NF-κB in L02 cells. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01