Literature DB >> 31434297

Public Perception towards Waste-to-Energy as a Waste Management Strategy: A Case from Shandong, China.

Xueliang Yuan1, Xiaohan Fan1, Jiaxin Liang2,3, Mengyue Liu1, Yuqiang Teng1, Qiao Ma1, Qingsong Wang4, Ruimin Mu5, Jian Zuo6.   

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) is posing great challenge for most countries in the world, which can cause severe negative impacts to the environment and human health. Waste-to-energy has great potential in China because of its technological maturity and policy support at the national level. However, there are significant conflicts between the huge market demand and strong public opposition. It is imperative to examine the public perception of waste-to-energy, especially for developing countries where a large number of projects are under construction or have been approved. The public perception of waste-to-energy was carried out by a questionnaire survey in this research. A total of 650 questionnaires were distributed and 629 questionnaires were returned, with a response rate of 96.8%. The results show that the public showed general concern in regard to environmental issues. Respondents had an overall positive attitude towards waste-to-energy, but it varied according to the demographic details of residents, such as age, education, and income. Recognition level of the benefits was higher than the concern of associated risks. Multiple linear regression shows that awareness of environmental issues had no impact on public attitude towards waste-to-energy, while public awareness and perceived benefits had notable positive impacts. Perceived risks had a positive correlation with public attitude. In order to promote the development of MSW incinerators, the government should make more publicity efforts. Rural residents, people over 50 years old, and people with low education and low income are the major groups which should be focused on to enhance the public perception. The findings provide a theoretical and practical reference for enhancing the social acceptance of waste-to-energy development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  incineration; municipal solid waste; social acceptance; sustainable development

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31434297      PMCID: PMC6720593          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  10 in total

1.  Resident's concerns and attitudes towards Solid Waste Management facilities.

Authors:  B Rahardyan; T Matsuto; Y Kakuta; N Tanaka
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 7.145

2.  Risk perception and public acceptance toward a highly protested Waste-to-Energy facility.

Authors:  Xiangyu Ren; Yue Che; Kai Yang; Yun Tao
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 7.145

3.  The effect of coal alternative fuel from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal carbonization on atmospheric pollutant emissions in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Andile B Maqhuzu; Kunio Yoshikawa; Fumitake Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Garbage source classification performance, impact factor, and management strategy in rural areas of China: A case study in Hangzhou.

Authors:  Xiangru Li; Feng Bi; Zedong Han; Yong Qin; Haoshu Wang; Weixiang Wu
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 7.145

5.  Does municipal solid waste generation in China support the Environmental Kuznets Curve? New evidence from spatial linkage analysis.

Authors:  Shan Gui; Liange Zhao; Zhijian Zhang
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 7.145

6.  Soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma clusters around a municipal solid waste incinerator with high dioxin emission levels.

Authors:  J F Viel; P Arveux; J Baverel; J Y Cahn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Estimation of optimal biomass fraction measuring cycle formunicipal solid waste incineration facilities in Korea.

Authors:  Seongmin Kang; Jae Hyung Cha; Yoon-Jung Hong; Daekyeom Lee; Ki-Hyun Kim; Eui-Chan Jeon
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 7.145

8.  Chromium release from waste incineration air-pollution-control residues.

Authors:  T Astrup; C Rosenblad; S Trapp; T H Christensen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  S Bhuvaneshwari; Hiroshan Hettiarachchi; Jay N Meegoda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Network Design for Municipal Solid Waste Collection: A Case Study of the Nanjing Jiangbei New Area.

Authors:  Jing Liang; Ming Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Perceived Value Influencing the Household Waste Sorting Behaviors in Rural China.

Authors:  Ying Ma; Mansoor Ahmed Koondhar; Shengke Liu; Huiling Wang; Rong Kong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Public perception and awareness of waste management from Benin City.

Authors:  P O Adekola; F O Iyalomhe; A Paczoski; S T Abebe; B Pawłowska; M Bąk; G T Cirella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.