Literature DB >> 31433834

Congruence Between 1994 WHO Classification of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia System.

Antonio Travaglino1, Antonio Raffone2, Gabriele Saccone2, Massimo Mascolo1, Maurizio Guida2, Antonio Mollo2, Luigi Insabato1, Fulvio Zullo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess congruence between World Health Organization (WHO) 1994 and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) classification systems of endometrial hyperplasia.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching electronic databases for studies that classified endometrial hyperplasia according to both WHO 1994 and EIN systems. Congruence was based on the rate of specimens classified as EIN in WHO categories, which should be virtually 0.000 in nonatypical hyperplasia (NAH) and 1.000 in atypical hyperplasia (AH). Subgroup analyses were performed based on architecture complexity.
RESULTS: Eight studies with 1,352 hyperplasias were included. Congruence with EIN criteria was fair in NAH (0.241) and moderate in AH (0.815). Subgroup analyses of NAH showed high congruence in simple NAH (0.065), null in complex NAH (0.517), null in simple AH (0.148), and high in complex AH (0.901).
CONCLUSIONS: WHO 1994 system is not congruent with the EIN system and cannot be directly translated into a dual classification. © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; Endometrial precancer; Endometrioid adenocarcinoma; World Health Organization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31433834     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  4 in total

1.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-Montoli; Jordi Sabadell; Nayanar-Adela Contreras-Perez
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  The Metabolomic Approach for the Screening of Endometrial Cancer: Validation from a Large Cohort of Women Scheduled for Gynecological Surgery.

Authors:  Jacopo Troisi; Antonio Mollo; Martina Lombardi; Giovanni Scala; Sean M Richards; Steven J K Symes; Antonio Travaglino; Daniele Neola; Umberto de Laurentiis; Luigi Insabato; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Antonio Raffone; Maurizio Guida
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Prevalence of adenomyosis in endometrial cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Raffone; Renato Seracchioli; Diego Raimondo; Manuela Maletta; Antonio Travaglino; Ivano Raimondo; Ilaria Giaquinto; Benedetta Orsini; Luigi Insabato; Massimiliano Pellicano; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Raffone; Antonio Travaglino; Diego Raimondo; Dominga Boccia; Martino Vetrella; Paolo Verrazzo; Marcello Granata; Paolo Casadio; Luigi Insabato; Antonio Mollo; Renato Seracchioli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 4.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.