| Literature DB >> 31433574 |
Jie Sun1, Jing Wang1, Na Zhang1, Renjun Yang1, Keyang Chen2, Derun Kong1.
Abstract
RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a useful method to explore the molecular events in cells and tissues at the transcriptional level. However, comprehensive transcriptome analysis of hepatocarcinogenesis and progression is lacking. In this study, we aimed to characterize a dimethylnitrosamine (DEN) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4 ; DEN+CCl4 )-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mouse model by RNA-Seq. In total, 2033 genes were up-regulated and 841 genes were down-regulated after DEN and CCl4 stimulation. The differentially expressed genes were highly enriched for the Gene Ontology terms oxoacid metabolic process, carboxylic acid metabolic process, and organic acid metabolic process. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis revealed that the top five significantly overrepresented pathways were metabolic pathways, chemical carcinogenesis, steroid hormone biosynthesis, retinol metabolism and metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450. Moreover, a protein-protein interaction network analysis indicated that Rous sarcoma oncogene (Src) may play a key role in DEN+CCl4 -induced HCC. These results provide a comprehensive overview of transcriptome events in DEN+CCl4 -induced HCC.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-sequencing; dimethylnitrosamine; hepatocellular carcinoma; tetrachloride-induced; transcriptome analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31433574 PMCID: PMC6823285 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.693
Figure 1DEN+CCl4‐stimulated HCC in mice. (A, B) Schematic depiction of the experimental design of the HCC mouse model induced by DEN and CCl4. (C–E) Tumor and liver samples were identified macroscopically and microscopically. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections from treated and control mice (original magnification from left to right: ×100, ×200, and ×400; scale bar: 50 μm). Con, control; i.p., intraperitoneally.
Figure 2Distributions of up‐regulated and down‐regulated genes. (A) Composition of raw reads after DEN and CCl4 injection. (B) Bar graph shows the number of up‐regulated and down‐regulated genes in the low‐ and high‐dose groups compared with the control group. (C) Venn diagram of up‐regulated genes in both the high‐ and low‐dose groups. (D) Venn diagram of down‐regulated genes in both the high‐ and low‐dose groups. P ≤ 0.05; |Log2FC| ≥ 1. (E) Heatmap of DEGs among the three groups. Con, control.
Figure 3GO analysis. Significant GO terms for DEGs between the high‐dose group (A) or the low‐dose group (B) and the control group.
Figure 4Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis. Significant pathways for DEGs between the high‐dose group (A) or the low‐dose group (B) and the control group.
Figure 5Protein‐protein interaction network analysis. (A) Network analysis of the DEGs in the high‐dose group versus the control group. (B) Network analysis of the DEGs in the low‐dose group versus the control group. Cdk1, cyclin‐dependent kinase 1; Rac2, Rac family small GTPase 2; Tnf, tumor necrosis factor; Top2a, topoisomerase (DNA) II alpha.