Hollie A Power1, Michael J Morhart1, Jaret L Olson1, K Ming Chan2. 1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome often have poor functional recovery with conventional surgical treatment. Postsurgical electrical stimulation (PES) has been shown to enhance axonal regeneration in animal and human studies. OBJECTIVE: To determine if PES following surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome would result in better outcomes compared to surgery alone. METHODS:Patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to the control or stimulation groups. Control patients received cubital tunnel surgery and sham stimulation, whereas patients in the stimulation group received 1-h of 20 Hz PES following surgery. Patients were assessed by a blinded evaluator annually for 3 yr. The primary outcome was motor unit number estimation (MUNE) and secondary outcomes were grip and key pinch strength and McGowan grade and compound muscle action potential. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were enrolled: 11 receivedsurgery alone and 20 received surgery and PES. Three years following surgery, MUNE was significantly higher in the PES group (176 ± 23, mean + SE) compared to controls (88 ± 11, P < .05). The mean gain in key pinch strength in the PES group was almost 3 times greater than in the controls (P < .05). Similarly, other functional and physiological outcomes showed significantly greater improvements in the PES group. CONCLUSION:PES enhanced muscle reinnervation and functional recovery following surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome. It may be a clinically useful adjunct to surgery for severe ulnar neuropathy, in which functional recovery with conventional treatment is often suboptimal.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome often have poor functional recovery with conventional surgical treatment. Postsurgical electrical stimulation (PES) has been shown to enhance axonal regeneration in animal and human studies. OBJECTIVE: To determine if PES following surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome would result in better outcomes compared to surgery alone. METHODS:Patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to the control or stimulation groups. Control patients received cubital tunnel surgery and sham stimulation, whereas patients in the stimulation group received 1-h of 20 Hz PES following surgery. Patients were assessed by a blinded evaluator annually for 3 yr. The primary outcome was motor unit number estimation (MUNE) and secondary outcomes were grip and key pinch strength and McGowan grade and compound muscle action potential. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were enrolled: 11 received surgery alone and 20 received surgery and PES. Three years following surgery, MUNE was significantly higher in the PES group (176 ± 23, mean + SE) compared to controls (88 ± 11, P < .05). The mean gain in key pinch strength in the PES group was almost 3 times greater than in the controls (P < .05). Similarly, other functional and physiological outcomes showed significantly greater improvements in the PES group. CONCLUSION:PES enhanced muscle reinnervation and functional recovery following surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome. It may be a clinically useful adjunct to surgery for severe ulnar neuropathy, in which functional recovery with conventional treatment is often suboptimal.
Authors: Seth C Ransom; Shane Shahrestani; Brian V Lien; Ali R Tafreshi; Nolan J Brown; Brian Hanst; Brandon M Lehrich; R Chase Ransom; Ronald Sahyouni Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Hongkai Wang; Dom D'Andrea; Yeon Sik Choi; Yasmine Bouricha; Grace Wickerson; Hak-Young Ahn; Hexia Guo; Yonggang Huang; Milap S Sandhu; Sumanas W Jordan; John A Rogers; Colin K Franz Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Hexia Guo; Dom D'Andrea; Jie Zhao; Yue Xu; Zheng Qiao; Lindsay E Janes; Nikhil K Murthy; Rui Li; Zhaoqian Xie; Zhen Song; Rohan Meda; Jahyun Koo; Wubin Bai; Yeon Sik Choi; Sumanas W Jordan; Yonggang Huang; Colin K Franz; John A Rogers Journal: Adv Funct Mater Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 19.924
Authors: Joseph Roh; Lauren Schellhardt; Grace C Keane; Daniel A Hunter; Amy M Moore; Alison K Snyder-Warwick; Susan E Mackinnon; Matthew D Wood Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 5.169