Literature DB >> 31431940

diff_classifier: Parallelization of multi-particle tracking video analyses.

Chad Curtis1, Ariel Rokem2, Elizabeth Nance1.   

Abstract

The diff_classifier package seeks to address the issue of scale-up in multi-particle tracking (MPT) analyses via a parallelization approach. MPT is a powerful analytical tool that has been used in fields ranging from aeronautics to oceanography (Pulford, 2005) allowing researchers to collect spatial and velocity information of moving objects from video datasets. Examples include: Tracking tracers in ocean currents to study fluid flowTracking molecular motors (e.g., myosin, kinesin) to assess motile activityMeasuring intracellular trafficking by tracking membrane vesiclesAssessing microrheological properties by tracking nanoparticle movement.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31431940      PMCID: PMC6701843          DOI: 10.21105/joss.00989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Open Source Softw        ISSN: 2475-9066


While a variety of tracking algorithms are available to researchers (Chenouard et al., 2014), a common problem is that data analysis usually depends on the use of graphical user interfaces, and relies on human input for accurate tracking. For example, particle detection often relies on the selection of a quality threshold, a numerical quantity distinguishing between “real” particles and “fake” particles (Tineves et al., 2017). If this threshold is too high, false positive trajectories result in skewed MSD profiles, and in extreme cases, cause the code to crash due to a lack of convergence in the particle linking step. If the threshold is too low, trajectories will be cut short resulting in a bias towards short fast-moving trajectories and could result in empty datasets (Wang, Nunn, Harit, McKinley, & Lai, 2015). Due to variations in experimental conditions and image quality, user-selected tracking parameters can vary widely from video to video. As parameter selection can also vary from user to user, this also brings up the issue of reproducibility. diff_classifier addresses these issues with regression tools to predict input tracking parameters and parallelized script-based implementations in Amazon Web Services (AWS), using the Simple Storage Service (S3) and Batch for data storage and computing, respectively, and relying on the Cloudknot software library for automating these interactions (Richie-Halford & Rokem, 2018). By manually tracking a small subset of the entire video dataset to be analyzed (5–10 videos per experiment), users can predict tracking parameters based on intensity distributions of input images. This can simultaneously reduce time-to-first-result in MPT workflows and provide reproducible MPT results. diff_classifier also includes downstream MPT analysis tools including mean squared displacement and feature calculations, visualization tools, and a principal component analysis implementation. MPT is commonly used to calculate and report ensemble-averaged diffusion coefficients of nanoparticles and other objects. We sought to expand the power of MPT analyses by changing the unit of analysis to individual particle trajectories. By including a variety of features (e.g., aspect ratio, boundedness, fractal dimension), with trajectory-level resolution, users can implement a range of data science analysis techniques to their MPT datasets.
  3 in total

1.  Minimizing biases associated with tracking analysis of submicron particles in heterogeneous biological fluids.

Authors:  Ying-Ying Wang; Kenetta L Nunn; Dimple Harit; Scott A McKinley; Samuel K Lai
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Tinevez; Nick Perry; Johannes Schindelin; Genevieve M Hoopes; Gregory D Reynolds; Emmanuel Laplantine; Sebastian Y Bednarek; Spencer L Shorte; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.

Authors:  Nicolas Chenouard; Ihor Smal; Fabrice de Chaumont; Martin Maška; Ivo F Sbalzarini; Yuanhao Gong; Janick Cardinale; Craig Carthel; Stefano Coraluppi; Mark Winter; Andrew R Cohen; William J Godinez; Karl Rohr; Yannis Kalaidzidis; Liang Liang; James Duncan; Hongying Shen; Yingke Xu; Klas E G Magnusson; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux; Philippe Roudot; Charles Kervrann; François Waharte; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Spencer L Shorte; Joost Willemse; Katherine Celler; Gilles P van Wezel; Han-Wei Dan; Yuh-Show Tsai; Carlos Ortiz de Solórzano; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Erik Meijering
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 28.547

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Surfactants influence polymer nanoparticle fate within the brain.

Authors:  Andrea Joseph; Georges Motchoffo Simo; Torahito Gao; Norah Alhindi; Nuo Xu; Daniel J Graham; Lara J Gamble; Elizabeth Nance
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 15.304

2.  Organotypic whole hemisphere brain slice models to study the effects of donor age and oxygen-glucose-deprivation on the extracellular properties of cortical and striatal tissue.

Authors:  Michael McKenna; Jeremy R Filteau; Brendan Butler; Kenneth Sluis; Michael Chungyoun; Nels Schimek; Elizabeth Nance
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.248

Review 3.  Microrheology for biomaterial design.

Authors:  Katherine Joyner; Sydney Yang; Gregg A Duncan
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2020-12-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.