Literature DB >> 31431812

Enhanced blebbing as a marker for metastatic prostate cancer.

Zeina S Khan1, Julianna M Santos1, Neil G Vaz1, Fazle Hussain1.   

Abstract

Highly metastatic prostate cancer cells flowing through a microfluidic channel form plasma membrane blebs: they form 27% more than normal cells and have a lower stiffness (about 50%). Hypo-osmotic stress assays (with ∼ 50 % osmolarity) show 22% more blebbing of highly metastatic than moderately metastatic and 30% more than normal cells. Plasma membrane blebbing is known to provide important metastatic capabilities to cancer cells by aiding cell detachment from the primary tumor site and increasing cell deformability to promote cell migration through the extracellular matrix. Increased blebbing was attributed by others to decreased phosphorylated ezrin, radixin, and moesin (ERM) (p-ERM) protein expression-p-ERMs bind the plasma membrane to the actin cortex and reduced p-ERM expression can weaken membrane-cortex attachment. Myosin II also influences blebbing as myosin's natural contraction generates tension in the actin cortex. This increases cellular hydrostatic pressure, causes cortex rupture, cytoplasm flow out of the cortex, and hence blebbing. Highly metastatic cells are surprisingly found to express similar ezrin and myosin II levels but higher moesin levels in comparison with lowly metastatic or normal cells-suggesting that their levels, contrary to the literature [G. Charras and E. Paluch, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9(9), 730-736 (2008); J.-Y. Tinevez, U. Schulze, G. Salbreux, J. Roensch, J.-F. Joanny, and E. Paluch, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(44), 18581-18586 (2009); M. Bergert, S. D. Chandradoss, R. A. Desai, and E. Paluch, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(36), 14434-14439 (2012); E. K. Paluch and E. Raz: Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25(5), 582-590 (2013)], are not important in metastatic prostate cell blebbing. Our results show that reduced F-actin is primarily responsible for increased blebbing in these metastatic cells. Blebbing can thus serve as a simple prognostic marker for the highly incident and lethal metastatic prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31431812      PMCID: PMC6697032          DOI: 10.1063/1.5085346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  57 in total

1.  Differences in cortical actin structure and dynamics document that different types of blebs are formed by distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Hansuli Keller; Patrick Rentsch; Jörg Hagmann
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells.

Authors:  M L Gardel; F Nakamura; J H Hartwig; J C Crocker; T P Stossel; D A Weitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Androgen receptor expression in androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines.

Authors:  A Chlenski; K Nakashiro ; K V Ketels; G I Korovaitseva; R Oyasu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Filamin-A fragment localizes to the nucleus to regulate androgen receptor and coactivator functions.

Authors:  C J Loy; K S Sim; E L Yong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The cytoskeleton and cell volume regulation.

Authors:  S F Pedersen; E K Hoffmann; J W Mills
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.320

Review 6.  Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization.

Authors:  Daisuke Yamazaki; Shusaku Kurisu; Tadaomi Takenawa
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 7.  The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Feldman; D Feldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Active relocation of chromatin and endoplasmic reticulum into blebs in late apoptotic cells.

Authors:  Jon D Lane; Victoria J Allan; Philip G Woodman
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  John Concato; Carolyn K Wells; Ralph I Horwitz; David Penson; Graeme Fincke; Dan R Berlowitz; Gregory Froehlich; Dawna Blake; Martyn A Vickers; Gerald A Gehr; Nabil H Raheb; Gail Sullivan; Peter Peduzzi
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-09

10.  Development of a new plasmid vector with PSA-promoter and enhancer expressing tissue-specificity in prostate carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  S E Lee; R J Jin; S G Lee; S J Yoon; M S Park; D S Heo; H Choi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

View more
  1 in total

1.  Poroelastic osmoregulation of living cell volume.

Authors:  Mohammad Hadi Esteki; Andrea Malandrino; Ali Akbar Alemrajabi; Graham K Sheridan; Guillaume Charras; Emad Moeendarbary
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.