Literature DB >> 31431490

Long-term impact of plain packaging of cigarettes with larger graphic health warnings: findings from cross-sectional surveys of Australian adolescents between 2011 and 2017.

Victoria M White1,2, Nicola Guerin2, Tahlia Williams2, Melanie A Wakefield2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term impact of plain packaging (PP) of cigarettes with larger graphic health warnings (HW) introduced in December 2012 on adolescents' relevant tobacco-related perceptions.
METHODS: Cross-sectional school-based surveys of 12 to 17 year olds in 2011 (n=4413), 2013 (n=4423), 2014 (n=4576) and 2017 (n=4266). Students rated the character of four popular cigarette brands, indicated their agreement regarding brand differences in smoking ease, quitting, addictiveness, harmfulness and pack attractiveness and positive/negative perceptions of pack image. The frequency of students reading, attending to, thinking and talking about HW was assessed. Responses of students seeing cigarette packs in the previous 6 months (2011: 63%; 2013: 67%, 2014: 56%, 2017: 56%) were examined.
RESULTS: Smoking prevalence declined from 2011 to 2017. Among students who had recently seen packs, cigarette packs were rated less positively and more negatively in 2017 than in 2011 (p<0.001) with ratings similar between 2013 and 2017. Positive character ratings for each brand reduced between 2011 and 2013 (ps<0.05) with further reductions between 2013 and 2017 (ps<0.05). Fewer students agreed, and more were uncertain, that brands differed in their smoking ease, addictiveness, harmfulness and pack attractiveness in 2017 than 2011. The frequency of students reading, attending, talking or thinking about HW did not change between 2011 and 2017.
CONCLUSIONS: PP's initial impact in reducing adolescent's positive perceptions of cigarette packs and brand differences continued in the following years with tobacco packaging less appealing to young people in 2017 than 2011 and students more uncertain about brand differences. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Smoking adolescents; graphic warning labels; plain packaging; standardised packaging; tobacco products

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31431490     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  4 in total

1.  Assessing cigarette packaging and labelling policy effects on early adolescents: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez; Farahnaz Islam; Yoo Jin Cho; Ramzi George Salloum; Jordan Louviere; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Joaquin Barnoya; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James Hardin; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Consumer Response to Standardized Tobacco Packaging in the United Kingdom: A Synthesis of Evidence from Two Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Crawford Moodie; Kathryn Angus; Martine Stead
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-04-12

3.  Plain packaging on tobacco products in France: Effectiveness on smokers' attitudes one year after implementation.

Authors:  Anne Pasquereau; Romain Guignard; Raphaël Andler; Karine Gallopel-Morvan; Viêt Nguyen-Thanh
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.163

4.  Influence of cigarette packet branding and colours on young male smokers' recognition, appeal and harm perceptions of tobacco brands in Cambodia: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Thomas Stubbs; Victoria White; Hua-Hie Yong; Chhea Chhordaphea; John W Toumbourou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.