Literature DB >> 31431376

Diffusion-weighted MRI with ADC mapping for response prediction and assessment of oesophageal cancer: A systematic review.

Sophie E Vollenbrock1, Francine E M Voncken2, Lambertus W Bartels3, Regina G H Beets-Tan4, Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to perform a systematic review on the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in the prediction and assessment of response to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Studies that evaluated the ADC for response evaluation before, during or after chemo- and/or radiotherapy were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies, comprising 516 patients, in which the response to treatment in oesophageal cancer was evaluated on ADC maps were included. Acquisition parameter settings for DW-MRI and ROI placement varied substantially. The reference standard was RECIST or endoscopic assessment in eight non-surgery studies and histopathology after surgery in six studies. A high pre-treatment ADC significantly correlated with good response in three out of 12 studies; conversely, one study reported a significantly higher pre-treatment ADC in poor responders. In five out of eight studies good responders showed a significantly larger relative increase in ADC two weeks after the onset of treatment (range 23-59%) than poor responders (range 1.5-17%). After chemo- and/or radiotherapy ADC results varied considerably, amongst others due to large variation in the interval between completion of therapy and DW-MRI.
CONCLUSION: DW-MRI for response evaluation to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer shows variable methods and results. A large relative ADC increase after two weeks of treatment seems most predictive for good response.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; MRI; Oesophageal cancer; Response

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31431376     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

1.  Clinical response assessment on DW-MRI compared with FDG-PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sophie E Vollenbrock; Francine E M Voncken; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Maarten L Donswijk; Erik Vegt; Leon C Ter Beek; Jolanda M van Dieren; Johanna W van Sandick; Berthe M P Aleman; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Survival Risk Prediction of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on BES-LSSVM.

Authors:  Yanfeng Wang; Wenhao Zhang; Junwei Sun; Lidong Wang; Xin Song; Xueke Zhao
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  Survival Prediction Model for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on the Parameter-Optimized Deep Belief Network Using the Improved Archimedes Optimization Algorithm.

Authors:  Yanfeng Wang; Wenhao Zhang; Junwei Sun; Lidong Wang; Xin Song; Xueke Zhao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Repeatability and Reproducibility Assessment of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Prostate: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (ACRIN 6701).

Authors:  Michael A Boss; Bradley S Snyder; Eunhee Kim; Dena Flamini; Sarah Englander; Karthik M Sundaram; Naveen Gumpeni; Suzanne L Palmer; Haesun Choi; Adam T Froemming; Thorsten Persigehl; Matthew S Davenport; Dariya Malyarenko; Thomas L Chenevert; Mark A Rosen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.119

5.  Early Response to Chemotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Evaluated Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Initial Observations.

Authors:  Sebastian Curcean; Lin Cheng; Simona Picchia; Nina Tunariu; David Collins; Matthew Blackledge; Sanjay Popat; Mary O'Brien; Anna Minchom; Martin O Leach; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2021-11-02

6.  Geometrical Comparison and Quantitative Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT- and DW-MRI-Based Target Delineation Before and During Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Huimin Li; Jianbin Li; Fengxiang Li; Yingjie Zhang; Yankang Li; Yanluan Guo; Liang Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Percent change in apparent diffusion coefficient and plasma EBV DNA after induction chemotherapy identifies distinct prognostic response phenotypes in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Li-Ting Liu; Shan-Shan Guo; Hui Li; Lin-Quan Tang; Chuan-Miao Xie; Hai-Qiang Mai; Chao Lin; Rui Sun; Qiu-Yan Chen; Yu-Jing Liang; Qing-Nan Tang; Xue-Song Sun
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI to detect early response to chemoradiation in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa N Harry; Sunil Persad; Bharat Bassaw; David Parkin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-10-18

9.  Diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Zhi-Yong Sun; Hua-Wei Wu; Chen-Peng Zhang; Bin Hu; Ling Rong; Hai-Yan Chen; Hua-Ying Xie; Yu-Ming Wang; Hai-Ping Lin; Yong-Rui Bai; Qing Ye; Xiu-Mei Ma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.