Tomonori Katsuki1, Mitsuyoshi Takahara2, Yoshimitsu Soga1, Shin Okamoto3, Osamu Iida3, Masahiko Fujihara4, Daizo Kawasaki5, Kenji Ando1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan. 2. Department of Diabetes Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan. 3. Department of Cardiology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan. 4. Department of Cardiology, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan. 5. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine if endovascular therapy (EVT) with paclitaxel-coated stents increases the mortality risk in patients with symptomatic lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of paclitaxel-coated stent use in the femoropopliteal segment of 1535 symptomatic (Rutherford category 2 to 4) patients treated between January 2010 and December 2016 at 4 hospitals in Japan. The risk of all-cause mortality was examined between the 285 patients (mean age 73±8 years; 213 men) treated with a paclitaxel-coated stent (PTX-coated group) and 1250 patients (mean age 73±9 years; 872 men) not exposed to a paclitaxel-coated device (PTX-free group) during EVT. Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models stratified on the quintiles of the propensity score were used to investigate paclitaxel-coated stent use and mortality risk as well as interactions among baseline variables and the main outcome. Interactions between a PXT-coated stent and subgroups of the PTX-free group (bare stent and angioplasty) were also investigated, as was the impact of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk. The results of regression analysis are reported as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival estimates were 86.4% in the PTX-coated group vs 87.7% in the PTX-free group; the corresponding 5-year estimates were 77.5% vs 73.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the 2 groups (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.19, p=0.41). The cause of death also showed no remarkable difference between the groups. Chronic renal failure (p=0.044) and arterial calcification (p=0.022) demonstrated a significant interaction effect on the association of the use of a PTX-coated stent with all-cause mortality. No subgroup demonstrated that the use of a paclitaxel-coated stent was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. A dose dependency was not evident. CONCLUSION: Mortality risk following application of a PTX-coated stent did not increase over 5 years, irrespective of the dose. A PTX-coated stent for femoropopliteal lesions in PAD patients is a safe treatment option.
PURPOSE: To examine if endovascular therapy (EVT) with paclitaxel-coated stents increases the mortality risk in patients with symptomatic lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of paclitaxel-coated stent use in the femoropopliteal segment of 1535 symptomatic (Rutherford category 2 to 4) patients treated between January 2010 and December 2016 at 4 hospitals in Japan. The risk of all-cause mortality was examined between the 285 patients (mean age 73±8 years; 213 men) treated with a paclitaxel-coated stent (PTX-coated group) and 1250 patients (mean age 73±9 years; 872 men) not exposed to a paclitaxel-coated device (PTX-free group) during EVT. Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models stratified on the quintiles of the propensity score were used to investigate paclitaxel-coated stent use and mortality risk as well as interactions among baseline variables and the main outcome. Interactions between a PXT-coated stent and subgroups of the PTX-free group (bare stent and angioplasty) were also investigated, as was the impact of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk. The results of regression analysis are reported as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival estimates were 86.4% in the PTX-coated group vs 87.7% in the PTX-free group; the corresponding 5-year estimates were 77.5% vs 73.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the 2 groups (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.19, p=0.41). The cause of death also showed no remarkable difference between the groups. Chronic renal failure (p=0.044) and arterial calcification (p=0.022) demonstrated a significant interaction effect on the association of the use of a PTX-coated stent with all-cause mortality. No subgroup demonstrated that the use of a paclitaxel-coated stent was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. A dose dependency was not evident. CONCLUSION: Mortality risk following application of a PTX-coated stent did not increase over 5 years, irrespective of the dose. A PTX-coated stent for femoropopliteal lesions in PAD patients is a safe treatment option.
Authors: Michael D Dake; Gary M Ansel; Marc Bosiers; Andrew Holden; Osamu Iida; Michael R Jaff; Aaron E Lottes; Erin E O'Leary; Alan T Saunders; Marc Schermerhorn; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Thomas Zeller Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 2.740