| Literature DB >> 31430985 |
Chih-Chieh Wang1, Szu-Yu Ke2, Yun Feng2, Mei-Lin Ho3, Chung-Kai Chang4, Yu-Chun Chuang4, Gene-Hsiang Lee5.
Abstract
Two coordinationEntities:
Keywords: color change; coordination polymer; hydrogen bond; metal-organic framework; supramolecular architecture
Year: 2019 PMID: 31430985 PMCID: PMC6723790 DOI: 10.3390/polym11081369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1Coordination modes of squarate on the construction of extended 1D, 2D or 3D networks: (a) μ1,3-bis-monodentate, (b) μ1,2-bis-monodentate, (c) μ1,2,3-tris-monodentate, (d) μ1,2,3,4-tetrakis-monodentate, (e) bidentate μ2–, (f) monodentate μ4–, (g) bidentate/monodentate μ3–, (h) bidentate/monodentate μ5–, (i) bidentate/monodentate μ4–, (j) monodentate μ6–, (k) bidentate/monodentate μ6–.
Crystal data and refinement details of compounds 1 and 2.
| Compound | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
| C10H24Ho2O24 | C6H8Ho1O10 |
|
| 858.15 | 405.05 |
|
| Triclinic | Monoclinic |
|
| ||
|
| 7.2463(8) | 11.8844(11) |
|
| 7.4084(8) | 8.1321(7) |
|
| 12.6393(14) | 9.9939(9) |
|
| 96.599(2) | 90.00 |
|
| 93.691(2) | 96.097(2) |
|
| 116.651(2) | 90.00 |
|
| 597.26(11) | 960.40(15) |
|
| 2 | 4 |
|
| 150(2) | 250(2) |
|
| 2.386 | 2.801 |
|
| 6.682 | 8.288 |
|
| 1.64−27.5 | 1.72−27.5 |
|
| 7686 | 6229 |
|
| 2733 | 2215 |
|
| 2570 | 2037 |
|
| 0.0514 | 0.0424 |
|
| 163 | 181 |
|
| 0.0430, 0.1089 | 0.0391, 0.0926 |
|
| 0.0463, 0.1103 | 0.0424, 0.0940 |
|
| 1.216 | 1.296 |
1R1 = Σ||Fo − Fc||/Σ|Fo|; wR2(F2) = [Σw|Fo2 − Fc2|2/Σw(Fo4)]1/2. 2 GOF = {Σ[w|Fo2 − Fc2|2]/(n−p)}1/2.
Scheme 2Synthetic representation of compounds 1 and 2 (red for O atom, and gray-white for Ho and C atoms).
Figure 1(a) Coordination environments of Ho(III) ion in 1 with atom labelling scheme (ORTEP drawing, 30% thermal ellipsoids). The guest water molecules and H atoms are omitted for clarity. (b) The 1D ladder-like framework constructed via the bridges of Ho(III) ions and C2O42−, C4O42− ligands. (c) The 2D layered framework constructed via inter-ladder O−H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonds (yellow dashed lines) between the squarate ligands and coordinated water molecules. (d) The 3D supramolecular assembly of 1 via the assembly of 1D ladder-like Chains. (Yellow dashed lines for inter-ladder O−H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonds) (e) The 3D supramolecular assembly of 1 viewing along the a axis showing the guest water molecules (yellow color) intercalated into the 1D pores. (red for O atom, and gray-white for Ho and C atoms; yellow color for water molecules; yellow dashed lines for O−H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonds).
Bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) around Ho(III) ion in 1 1.
| Ho(1)−O(1) | 2.314(6) | Ho(1)−O(2)i | 2.317(6) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ho(1)−O(10) | 2.319(7) | Ho(1)−O(8) | 2.300(7) |
| Ho(1)−O(7) | 2.326(6) | Ho(1)−O(9) | 2.343(7) |
| Ho(1)−O(5) | 2.431(6) | Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 2.470(6) |
| O(1)−Ho(1)−O(2)i | 153.3(2) | O(1)−Ho(1)−O(10) | 92.0(3) |
| O(2)i−Ho(1)−O(10) | 100.3(3) | O(1)−Ho(1)−O(8) | 90.3(3) |
| O(2)i−Ho(1)−O(8) | 91.9(3) | O(10)−Ho(1)−O(8) | 147.2(3) |
| O(1)−Ho(1)−O(7) | 78.8(2) | O(2)−Ho(1)−O(7) | 76.5(2) |
| O(10)−Ho(1)−O(7) | 140.2(3) | O(8)−Ho(1)−O(7) | 72.2(2) |
| O(1)−Ho(1)−O(9) | 83.6(3) | O(2)i−Ho(1)−O(9) | 79.4(3) |
| O(10)−Ho(1)−O(9) | 67.9(3) | O(8)−Ho(1)−O(9) | 144.8(2) |
| O(7)−Ho(1)−O(9) | 72.6(2) | O(1)−Ho(1)−O(5) | 136.0(2) |
| O(2)i−Ho(1)−O(5) | 70.3(2) | O(10)−Ho(1)−O(5) | 76.5(3) |
| O(8)−Ho(1)−O(5) | 79.3(2) | O(7)−Ho(1)−O(5) | 135.0(2) |
| O(9)−Ho(1)−O(5) | 127.5(3) | O(1)−Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 70.9(2) |
| O(2)i−Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 135.3(2) | O(10)−Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 73.2(3) |
| O(8)−Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 76.7(2) | O(7)−Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 136.0(2) |
| O(9)−Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 132.2(2) | O(5)−Ho(1)−O(6)ii | 65.1(2) |
1 Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: i = x−1, y−1, z; ii = −x, −y, −z+1.
The O–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonds for 1 1.
| D−H⋅⋅⋅A | D−H (Å) | H⋅⋅⋅A (Å) | D⋅⋅⋅A (Å) | ∠ D−H⋅⋅⋅A (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| O(7)−H(7A)⋅⋅⋅O(4) | 0.852(6) | 1.778(6) | 2.627(10) | 174.3(5) |
| O(7)−H(7B)⋅⋅⋅O(3)i | 0.851(6) | 1.812(6) | 2.654(10) | 169.8(6) |
| O(8)−H(8A)⋅⋅⋅O(3)ii | 0.853(6) | 1.918(6) | 2.761(10) | 169.6(6) |
| O(8)−H(8B)⋅⋅⋅O(11) | 0.850(6) | 1.915(6) | 2.816(10) | 170.2(6) |
| O(9)−H(9A)⋅⋅⋅O(4)iii | 0.851(6) | 1.832(6) | 2.675(10) | 170.2(6) |
| O(9)−H(9B)⋅⋅⋅O(12)iv | 0.849(6) | 1.887(6) | 2.706(10) | 161.7(6) |
| O(10)−H(10A)⋅⋅⋅O(12))iv | 0.849(6) | 1.831(6) | 2.678(10) | 174.5(6) |
| O(10)−H(10B)⋅⋅⋅O(11)v | 0.849(6) | 1.829(6) | 2.677(10) | 175.6(6) |
| O(11)−H(11A)⋅⋅⋅O(2)vi | 0.848(6) | 2.058(6) | 2.772(10) | 141.4(6) |
| O(11)−H(11B)⋅⋅⋅O(1)vi | 0.846(6) | 1.998(6) | 2.785(10) | 154.3(6) |
| O(12)−H(12A)⋅⋅⋅O(6)v | 0.846(6) | 1.946(6) | 2.782(10) | 169.2(6) |
| O(12)−H(12B)⋅⋅⋅O(5)vii | 0.852(6) | 1.997(6) | 2.825(10) | 163.6(6) |
1 Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: i = x−1, y−1, z; ii = −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; iii = −x, −y+2, −z+2; iv = x−1, y, z; v = −x, −y+1, −z+1; vi = x, y−1, z; viii = x+1, y+1, z.
Figure 2(a) A square antiprismatic geometry of Ho(III) ion in 2 with atom labelling scheme (ORTEP drawing, 30% thermal ellipsoids) The H atoms are omitted for clarity. (b) Left: The 2D layered framework via the bridges of Ho(III) ions and μ1,2,3-C4O42−. Middle: The 2D bi-layers MOFs constructed via the bridges of Ho(III) and μ1,2,3- and μ1,2-C4O42−. Right: The bridges of Ho(III) and disorder μ1,2-C4O42−. (red for O atom, gray-white for C atom and green-gray for Ho atom) (c) The 3D supramolecular assembly of 2 viewing along the b axis. (red for O atom, and gray-white for Ho and C atoms) (d) The 3D supramolecular assembly of 2 viewing along the c axis.
Bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) around Ho(III) ion in 2 1.
| Ho(1)–O(9) | 2.305(5) | Ho(1)–O(6)i | 2.317(6) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ho(1)–O(10) | 2.327(6) | Ho(1)–O(3)ii | 2.367(5) |
| Ho(1)–O(11) | 2.375(6) | Ho(1)–O(5) | 2.379(6) |
| Ho(1)–O(1) | 2.408(5) | Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 2.415(5) |
| O(9)–Ho(1)–O(6)i | 143.2(2) | O(9)–Ho(1)–O(10) | 81.6(2) |
| O(6)i–Ho(1)–O(10) | 109.8(2) | O(9)–Ho(1)–O(3)ii | 74.6(2) |
| O(6)i–Ho(1)–O(3)ii | 77.4(2) | O(10)–Ho(1)–O(3)ii | 145.0(2) |
| O(9)–Ho(1)–O(11) | 109.5(2) | O(6)i–Ho(1)–O(11) | 85.1(2) |
| O(10)–Ho(1)–O(11) | 139.2(3) | O(3)ii−Ho(1)−O(11) | 74.2(2) |
| O(9)–Ho(1)–O(5) | 142.9(2) | O(6)i–Ho(1)–O(5) | 72.1(2) |
| O(10)–Ho(1)–O(5) | 72.0(3) | O(3)ii–Ho(1)–O(5) | 139.7(2) |
| O(11)–Ho(1)–O(5) | 77.5(2) | O(9)–Ho(1)–O(1) | 74.4(2) |
| O(6)i–Ho(1)–O(1) | 141.6(2) | O(10)–Ho(1)–O(1) | 76.8(3) |
| O(3)ii–Ho(1)–O(1) | 119.6(2) | O(11)–Ho(1)–O(1) | 69.4(2) |
| O(5)–Ho(1)–O(1) | 74.6(2) | O(9)−Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 76.1(2) |
| O(6)i–Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 73.6(2) | O(10)−Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 75.2(2) |
| O(3)ii–Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 74.3(2) | O(11)–Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 145.0(2) |
| O(5)–Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 119.7(2) | O(1)–Ho(1)–O(2)iii | 141.6(2) |
1 Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: i = −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; ii = x, y+1, z; iii = x, −y+1/2, z−1/2.
The O–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonds for 2 1.
| D–H⋅⋅⋅A | D–H (Å) | H⋅⋅⋅A (Å) | D⋅⋅⋅A (Å) | ∠ D–H⋅⋅⋅A (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| O(9)–H(9A)⋅⋅⋅O(4) | 0.854(6) | 1.869(5) | 2.689(8) | 160.4(4) |
| O(9)–H(9B)⋅⋅⋅O(4)i | 0.848(6) | 1.848(5) | 2.696(8) | 177.7(4) |
| O(10)–H(10A)⋅⋅⋅O(1)ii | 0.856(6) | 1.886(5) | 2.668(8) | 151.1(4) |
| O(10)–H(10B)⋅⋅⋅O(7)iii | 0.856(6) | 2.011(5) | 2.774(5) | 147.9(4) |
| O(10)–H(10B)⋅⋅⋅O(8) | 0.856(6) | 2.026(5) | 2.678(5) | 132.2(4) |
| O(11)–H(11A)⋅⋅⋅O(2)iv | 0.857(6) | 1.918(5) | 2.746(5) | 162.1(4) |
| O(11)–H(11B)⋅⋅⋅O(4)v | 0.853(6) | 2.181(5) | 2.941(5) | 148.1(4) |
1 Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: i = −x+2, −y, −z; ii = x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; iii = −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; iv = x, y+1, z; v = x, −y+1/2, z+1/2.
Figure 3(a) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and (b) in-situ temperature dependent powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of 1.
Figure 4(a) TGA and (b) in-situ temperature dependent powder XRD measurements of 2.
Figure 5The color-changing images and UV spectra of 1 (a) & (b) and 2 (c) & (d).