Madeline McDonald1, Conor Lavelle2, Mei Wen1, Jonathan Sherbino3, Jennifer Hulme4. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Health advocacy is an essential component of postgraduate medical education, and is part of many physician competency frameworks such as the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) roles. There is little consensus about how advocacy should be taught and assessed in the postgraduate context. There are no consolidated guides to assist in the design and implementation of postgraduate health advocacy curricula. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aims to identify and analyse existing literature pertaining to health advocacy education and assessment in postgraduate medicine. We specifically sought to summarise themes from the literature that may be useful to medical educators to inform further health advocacy curriculum interventions. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and ERIC were searched using MeSH (medical student headings) and non-MeSH search terms. Additional articles were found using forward snowballing. The grey literature search included Google and relevant stakeholder websites, regulatory bodies, physician associations, government agencies and academic institutions. We followed a stepwise scoping review methodology, followed by thematic analysis using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Of the 123 documents reviewed in full, five major themes emerged: (i) conceptions of health advocacy have evolved towards advocating with rather than for patients, communities and populations; (ii) longitudinal curricula were less common but appeared the most promising, often linked to scholarly or policy objectives; (iii) hands-on, immersive opportunities build competence and confidence; (iv) community-identified needs and partnerships are increasingly considered in designing curriculum, and (v) resident-led and motivated programmes appear to engage residents and allow for achievement of stated outcomes. There remain significant challenges to assessment of health advocacy competencies, and assessment tools for macro-level health advocacy were notably absent. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity in the way health advocacy is taught, assessed and incorporated into postgraduate curricula across programmes and disciplines. We consolidated recommendations from the literature to inform further health advocacy curriculum design, implementation and assessment.
CONTEXT: Health advocacy is an essential component of postgraduate medical education, and is part of many physician competency frameworks such as the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) roles. There is little consensus about how advocacy should be taught and assessed in the postgraduate context. There are no consolidated guides to assist in the design and implementation of postgraduate health advocacy curricula. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aims to identify and analyse existing literature pertaining to health advocacy education and assessment in postgraduate medicine. We specifically sought to summarise themes from the literature that may be useful to medical educators to inform further health advocacy curriculum interventions. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and ERIC were searched using MeSH (medical student headings) and non-MeSH search terms. Additional articles were found using forward snowballing. The grey literature search included Google and relevant stakeholder websites, regulatory bodies, physician associations, government agencies and academic institutions. We followed a stepwise scoping review methodology, followed by thematic analysis using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Of the 123 documents reviewed in full, five major themes emerged: (i) conceptions of health advocacy have evolved towards advocating with rather than for patients, communities and populations; (ii) longitudinal curricula were less common but appeared the most promising, often linked to scholarly or policy objectives; (iii) hands-on, immersive opportunities build competence and confidence; (iv) community-identified needs and partnerships are increasingly considered in designing curriculum, and (v) resident-led and motivated programmes appear to engage residents and allow for achievement of stated outcomes. There remain significant challenges to assessment of health advocacy competencies, and assessment tools for macro-level health advocacy were notably absent. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity in the way health advocacy is taught, assessed and incorporated into postgraduate curricula across programmes and disciplines. We consolidated recommendations from the literature to inform further health advocacy curriculum design, implementation and assessment.
Authors: Enrico G Castillo; Jessica Isom; Katrina L DeBonis; Ayana Jordan; Joel T Braslow; Robert Rohrbaugh Journal: Acad Med Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Kelly A Kyanko; Molly A Fisher; Latonya Riddle-Jones; Anders Chen; Francine Jetton; Thomas Staiger; Mark D Schwartz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Flora Kuehne; Laura Kalkman; Shiv Joshi; Wunna Tun; Nishwa Azeem; Dabota Yvonne Buowari; Chioma Amugo; Per Kallestrup; Christian Kraef Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Eleanor H Emery; Jonathan D Shaffer; Danny McCormick; Jessica Zeidman; Sophia R Geffen; Predrag Stojicic; Marshall Ganz; Gaurab Basu Journal: MedEdPORTAL Date: 2022-01-18