Literature DB >> 31430228

Inhalable and Respirable Particulate and Endotoxin Exposures in Kentucky Equine Farms.

Jooyeon Hwang1, Vijay Golla2, Nervana Metwali3, Peter S Thorne3.   

Abstract

Adverse respiratory health effects in the agricultural industry have been linked to particulate endotoxin exposure. However, whether the endotoxin concentration is significantly correlated to the size of the particle remains an open question. To date, limited research has been conducted to assess particulate endotoxin exposures in the agricultural industry in general or the equine industry in particular. A task-based exposure assessment was conducted to characterize the endotoxin levels of inhalable and respirable particles on four Kentucky farms during the summer season. We conducted personal sampling of respirable and inhalable particles (n = 75) across all four farms and particulate endotoxin (n = 58) on two of them. Simultaneously, we collected real-time area samples across all four farms by task - horse care, filing hooves, cleaning stalls, cleaning barns, cleaning dry lots, and cleaning trucks. The endotoxin concentration of inhalable particles (geometric mean: 50.2-1,024 EU/m3) was ~50 times higher than that of respirable particles (geometric mean: 1.72-19.0 EU/m3). Horse care generated the lowest endotoxin concentrations for both particle sizes, while cleaning tasks tended to produce higher concentrations. There was no significant correlation between the endotoxin and particle concentrations for each size fraction based on tasks by farm (R2 = 0.069 for inhalable; 0.214 for respirable). The equine workers in this study were exposed to higher endotoxin concentrations than workers in other industries, such as the swine industry. Providing exposure control guidelines and recommendations to the equine industry is necessary to reduce long-term endotoxin exposure and to prevent adverse respiratory symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Equine; endotoxin; particles; task-based exposure assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31430228      PMCID: PMC7031016          DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1656128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agromedicine        ISSN: 1059-924X            Impact factor:   1.675


  26 in total

1.  Airborne bacteria concentrations and related factors at university laboratories, hospital diagnostic laboratories and a biowaste site.

Authors:  Sung Ho Hwang; Dong Uk Park; Kwon Chul Ha; Hyun Woo Cho; Chung Sik Yoon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Total dust and endotoxin in poultry operations: comparison between cage and floor housing and respiratory effects in workers.

Authors:  S P Kirychuk; J A Dosman; S J Reynolds; P Willson; A Senthilselvan; J J R Feddes; H L Classen; W Guenter
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Exposure to inhalable dust, endotoxins, beta(1->3)-glucans, and airborne microorganisms in horse stables.

Authors:  Sadegh Samadi; Inge M Wouters; Rosa Houben; Ali-Reza Jamshidifard; Frank Van Eerdenburg; Dick J J Heederik
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-06-26

4.  Farm animal models of organic dust exposure and toxicity: insights and implications for respiratory health.

Authors:  Chakia J McClendon; Carresse L Gerald; Jenora T Waterman
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-04

5.  Evaluation of the Limulus amebocyte lysate and recombinant factor C assays for assessment of airborne endotoxin.

Authors:  Peter S Thorne; Sarah S Perry; Rena Saito; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; John Mehaffy; Nervana Metwali; Thomas Keefe; Kelley J Donham; Stephen J Reynolds
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Assessment of dust and endotoxin levels in the working environment of Dutch pig farmers: a preliminary study.

Authors:  P Attwood; P Versloot; D Heederik; R de Wit; J S Boleij
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1986

7.  A task-specific assessment of Swine worker exposure to airborne dust.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Kelley J Donham; Thomas M Peters; Craig Taylor; Ralph Altmaier; Kevin M Kelly
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Comparison of how ambient PMc and PM2.5 influence the inflammatory potential.

Authors:  Matthew D Ferguson; Chris Migliaccio; Tony Ward
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Organic dust exposures from work in dairy barns.

Authors:  G J Kullman; P S Thorne; P F Waldron; J J Marx; B Ault; D M Lewis; P D Siegel; S A Olenchock; J A Merchant
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-06

10.  Environmental exposures and airway inflammation in young thoroughbred horses.

Authors:  K M Ivester; L L Couëtil; G E Moore; N J Zimmerman; R E Raskin
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.