Literature DB >> 31429339

A study to assess knowledge and acceptability of foetal surgery for spina bifida amongst healthcare professionals in the UK.

Adalina Sacco1, Shahanaz Ahmed1, Jan Deprest1,2,3, Anna L David1,2,4.   

Abstract

Foetal surgery to repair open spina bifida before birth improves infant motor function and reduces ventriculoperitoneal shunt requirement. Alongside the development of the first UK foetal surgery service, we surveyed the knowledge and acceptability of this treatment to healthcare professionals in the UK and Ireland via an electronic questionnaire. Ninety-eight (98) responses were received: MFM clinicians (21), midwives (20), paediatric neurosurgeons (17), obstetricians (15), neonatologists (13), theatre nurses (11) and commissioners (1). Overall 70% of responders agreed with the concept that foetal surgery improved neonatal outcome in selected cases; although, only 41% of paediatric neurosurgeons agreed. A variety of concerns were expressed, the most common being the lack information regarding mid- to long-term effects on the child and mother.In offering this new service, it is important that we are cognisant of healthcare professional concerns and address them by applying internationally accepted criteria for foetal surgery, emphasising patient choice and collecting long-term data.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Foetal surgery is a potentially controversial intervention, which is increasing in availability globally. Foetal surgery is now available in the UK on a charitable-funding basis. Prior to starting a UK foetal surgery service, we assessed the attitudes and knowledge of healthcare professionals in the UK towards this new surgery.What the results of this study add? Overall the majority of healthcare professionals agree with the concept that foetal surgery improves neonatal outcome in selected cases, but a variety of concerns exist, the most common being the lack of information regarding mid- to long-term effects on the child and mother. Other concerns included a lack of education, training and research; the specific risk of preterm birth following surgery; the evidence base for this procedure; effects on maternal choice and financial implications.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Those developing this new service should be mindful of the concerns expressed and address them by applying internationally accepted criteria for foetal surgery, emphasising patient choice and collecting long-term data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spina bifida; acceptability; foetal surgery; healthcare professionals; opinions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31429339      PMCID: PMC7613456          DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1621820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.226


  11 in total

1.  Reproductive outcomes in subsequent pregnancies after a pregnancy complicated by open maternal-fetal surgery (1996-2007).

Authors:  R Douglas Wilson; Kerrie Lemerand; Mark P Johnson; Alan W Flake; Michael Bebbington; Holly L Hedrick; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Ethical dimensions of the fetus as a patient.

Authors:  Frank A Chervenak; Laurence B McCullough
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 3.  Prenatal surgery for spina bifida: a therapeutic dilemma. Proceedings of the SHINE conference, Belfast.

Authors:  Mano Shanmuganathan; Deborah A Sival; Kelly-Ann Eastwood; Katie Morris; Jacqueline Cartmill; Axel Heep; Janusz Bohosiewicz; Agnieszka Pastuszka; Alyson Hunter; Amanda Ali; Roy McConnell; Darach Crimmins; Fergal Malone; Carolyn Bailie; Jan Deprest; Cathy McKillop; Zarko Alfirevic; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Stephen Ong
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele.

Authors:  N Scott Adzick; Elizabeth A Thom; Catherine Y Spong; John W Brock; Pamela K Burrows; Mark P Johnson; Lori J Howell; Jody A Farrell; Mary E Dabrowiak; Leslie N Sutton; Nalin Gupta; Noel B Tulipan; Mary E D'Alton; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The 'fetus as a patient' in maternal-fetal surgery.

Authors:  H Catarina M L Rodrigues; Paul P van den Berg; Marcus Düwell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  RETIRED: Prenatal screening, diagnosis, and pregnancy management of fetal neural tube defects.

Authors:  R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2014-10

7.  The fetal patient -- ethical aspects of fetal therapy.

Authors:  J Deprest; J Toelen; Z Debyser; C Rodrigues; R Devlieger; L De Catte; L Lewi; T Van Mieghem; G Naulaers; M Vandevelde; F Claus; K Dierickx
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

8.  Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework.

Authors:  Mandeep Sekhon; Martin Cartwright; Jill J Francis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  The legal frameworks that govern fetal surgery in the United Kingdom, European Union, and the United States.

Authors:  Kevin X Cao; Alice Booth; Sebastien Ourselin; Anna L David; Richard Ashcroft
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  A study to assess global availability of fetal surgery for myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Adalina Sacco; Lynn Simpson; Jan Deprest; Anna L David
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.242

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fetoscopic myelomeningocoele closure: Is the scientific evidence enough to challenge the gold standard for prenatal surgery?

Authors:  E Joanne Verweij; Martine C de Vries; Esther J Oldekamp; Alex J Eggink; Dick Oepkes; Femke Slaghekke; Jochem K H Spoor; Jan A Deprest; Jena L Miller; Ahmet A Baschat; Philip L J DeKoninck
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.050

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.