Ying Wang1, Ya-Hong Wang1, Xin-Ping Tian2, Hong-Yan Wang1, Jing Li2, Zhi-Tong Ge2, Yun-Jiao Yang2, Sheng Cai1, Xiao-Feng Zeng3, Jian-Chu Li4. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Dongdansantiao, Beijing, 100730, China. 2. Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Dongdansantiao, Beijing, 100730, China. 3. Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Dongdansantiao, Beijing, 100730, China. zengxfpumc@163.com. 4. Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Dongdansantiao, Beijing, 100730, China. jianchu.li@163.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was recently used to evaluate vascularization within the carotid artery wall, and this process of vascularization was correlated with arteritis activity. We aimed to use CEUS to evaluate disease activity in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients. METHOD: We used CEUS to analyze 28 consecutive TAK patients. Disease activity was assessed according to the NIH criteria. We measured CEUS grades and assessed the correlation between contrast features and disease activity. RESULTS: Higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESRs) were found (35 ± 28.7 vs. 13 ± 7.4 mm/h, p < 0.01), and CEUS carotid wall enhancement was more frequently (100% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.01) seen in TAK patients in the active phase than in those in the inactive phase. With increasing CEUS grades, both the artery wall thickness and ESR increased, and patients were more likely to be in the active phase (0 in grade 0, 42.9% in grade 1, and 75% in grade 2). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that CEUS had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.872 (95% CI 0.785-0.959, p < 0.01), demonstrating good diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Higher CEUS grades reliably identify patients with active TAK.Key Points• No CEUS vascularization is obviously relative with the inactive disease of TAK patients.• Obvious CEUS vascularization is obviously relative with the active disease of TAK patients.
INTRODUCTION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was recently used to evaluate vascularization within the carotid artery wall, and this process of vascularization was correlated with arteritis activity. We aimed to use CEUS to evaluate disease activity in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients. METHOD: We used CEUS to analyze 28 consecutive TAK patients. Disease activity was assessed according to the NIH criteria. We measured CEUS grades and assessed the correlation between contrast features and disease activity. RESULTS: Higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESRs) were found (35 ± 28.7 vs. 13 ± 7.4 mm/h, p < 0.01), and CEUS carotid wall enhancement was more frequently (100% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.01) seen in TAK patients in the active phase than in those in the inactive phase. With increasing CEUS grades, both the artery wall thickness and ESR increased, and patients were more likely to be in the active phase (0 in grade 0, 42.9% in grade 1, and 75% in grade 2). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that CEUS had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.872 (95% CI 0.785-0.959, p < 0.01), demonstrating good diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Higher CEUS grades reliably identify patients with active TAK.Key Points• No CEUS vascularization is obviously relative with the inactive disease of TAK patients.• Obvious CEUS vascularization is obviously relative with the active disease of TAK patients.
Authors: Daniel Staub; Sasan Partovi; Arend F L Schinkel; Blai Coll; Heiko Uthoff; Markus Aschwanden; Kurt A Jaeger; Steven B Feinstein Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Arend F L Schinkel; Stijn C H van den Oord; Antonius F W van der Steen; Jan A M van Laar; Eric J G Sijbrands Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-11-17 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Giuseppe Germanò; Pierluigi Macchioni; Niccolò Possemato; Luigi Boiardi; Alberto Nicolini; Massimiliano Casali; Annibale Versari; Nicolò Pipitone; Carlo Salvarani Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Sophie Mavrogeni; Theodoros Dimitroulas; Sofia N Chatziioannou; George Kitas Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: M C Cid; M Cebrián; C Font; B Coll-Vinent; J Hernández-Rodríguez; J Esparza; A Urbano-Márquez; J M Grau Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2000-01
Authors: G S Kerr; C W Hallahan; J Giordano; R Y Leavitt; A S Fauci; M Rottem; G S Hoffman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1994-06-01 Impact factor: 25.391