BACKGROUND: The number of patients in emergency rooms without a medical emergency is increasing. Outpatient services for mutual support and relief between the in-patient and out-patient sector are not yet fully established. AIM OF THE WORK: The aim was to determine the extent to which patients in emergency rooms have real medical emergencies by comparing patients with at least two and those with a maximum of one chronic illness. An additional aim was to identify factors influencing the previous use of outpatient structures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study participants included emergency room patients from the cross-sectional study "PiNo-Nord." All persons in five emergency rooms in northern Germany between October 2015 and July 2016 who were not treated as "immediate" or "very urgent" were interviewed. An exploratory data analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: The 293 patients with ≥2 chronic diseases were just as often a medical emergency compared to the 847 patients with a maximum of 1 chronic disease. The most frequent occasions for consultation were musculoskeletal trauma (33%, n = 293 vs. 42%, n = 847) or trauma of the skin (11%, n = 293 vs. 13%, n = 847). In both groups, the general practitioner or specialist caregiver, as well as diagnostic or treatment options, rarely played a role in visiting the emergency department. The strongest predictors of previous outpatient treatment were the duration of the appeal in the last six months, a high subjective treatment urgency, the presence of at least two chronic conditions, and a consultation event concerning the musculoskeletal injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In both patient groups, no evidence of unnecessary visits to the emergency room was found. For the most part, outpatient structures are used in advance and the emergency department is only visited in the event of an actual medical emergency.
BACKGROUND: The number of patients in emergency rooms without a medical emergency is increasing. Outpatient services for mutual support and relief between the in-patient and out-patient sector are not yet fully established. AIM OF THE WORK: The aim was to determine the extent to which patients in emergency rooms have real medical emergencies by comparing patients with at least two and those with a maximum of one chronic illness. An additional aim was to identify factors influencing the previous use of outpatient structures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study participants included emergency room patients from the cross-sectional study "PiNo-Nord." All persons in five emergency rooms in northern Germany between October 2015 and July 2016 who were not treated as "immediate" or "very urgent" were interviewed. An exploratory data analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: The 293 patients with ≥2 chronic diseases were just as often a medical emergency compared to the 847 patients with a maximum of 1 chronic disease. The most frequent occasions for consultation were musculoskeletal trauma (33%, n = 293 vs. 42%, n = 847) or trauma of the skin (11%, n = 293 vs. 13%, n = 847). In both groups, the general practitioner or specialist caregiver, as well as diagnostic or treatment options, rarely played a role in visiting the emergency department. The strongest predictors of previous outpatient treatment were the duration of the appeal in the last six months, a high subjective treatment urgency, the presence of at least two chronic conditions, and a consultation event concerning the musculoskeletal injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In both patient groups, no evidence of unnecessary visits to the emergency room was found. For the most part, outpatient structures are used in advance and the emergency department is only visited in the event of an actual medical emergency.
Entities:
Keywords:
Medical emergency; Need for treatment; Outpatient structures; PiNo; Predictors