| Literature DB >> 31428719 |
Matthew A Gronski1, Ethan D Grober2, Irving S Gottesman3, Ross W Ormsby1, Nathan Bryson1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy data from a phase 3 testosterone nasal gel (TNG) study were stratified by baseline endogenous testosterone level in patients with testosterone deficiency. Total testosterone (TT), LH, and FSH levels, as well as erectile function, mood, and lean body mass for each group were compared. In a subset of patients with very low baseline endogenous testosterone levels (<100 ng/dL), we investigated whether TNG is a suitable treatment option.Entities:
Keywords: luteinizing hormone; maximal concentration; predose; testosterone; testosterone deficiency syndrome; testosterone nasal gel
Year: 2019 PMID: 31428719 PMCID: PMC6694041 DOI: 10.1210/js.2019-00183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endocr Soc ISSN: 2472-1972
Demographics, Baseline Testosterone, and Questionnaire Scores of Patient Cohorts Grouped by Baseline TT as Measured Before the First Study Dose
| Baseline TT, ng/dL | No. of Patients | Age (y) | Weight (kg) | Height (cm) | BMI (kg/m2) | Average TT Concentration (ng/dL) | PANAS Score, Positive | PANAS Score, Negative | IIEF Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <100 | 26 | 55.6 (13.3) | 91.3 (14.4) | 177.7 (5.9) | 28.8 (3.6) | 61.8 (31.5) | 30.7 (7.9) | 16.7 (6.6) | 28.7 (20.0) |
| <150 | 30 | 55.6 (9.7) | 91.5 (11.9) | 177.7 (5.9) | 28.8 (3.3) | 128.5 (14.7) | 32.0 (8.6) | 17.6 (7.3) | 32.7 (18.2) |
| <200 | 47 | 52.9 (10.8) | 97.6 (14.5) | 179.0 (6.2) | 30.4 (3.6) | 172.9 (15.0) | 29.3 (10.8) | 16.7 (7.7) | 35.2 (20.3) |
| <250 | 56 | 56.3 (10.6) | 93.2 (12.4) | 176.4 (6.4) | 29.9 (3.2) | 223.8 (14.4) | 27.3 (11.7) | 15.1 (7.4) | 32.3 (21.4) |
| <300 | 75 | 53.7 (11.1) | 94.6 (13.9) | 176.5 (7.7) | 30.3 (3.5) | 272.4 (15.0) | 30.6 (7.8) | 16.4 (5.6) | 38 (19.3) |
Data are reported as mean (SD).
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Figure 1.Average TT concentrations from dosing to 10 h after dosing. Patients were stratified by their predose concentration.
Figure 2.Effect of predose TT concentration on Cmax after Natesto TNG given in the (a) morning or (b) evening on day 30 of the study. Patients were grouped such that “100” contains patients who had TT predoses <100 ng/dL, “150” contains patients with TT concentrations from 100 to <150 ng/dL, and so forth. (c) Effect of predose concentration on Cavg over 24 h on day 90.
Figure 3.IIEF score change from baseline to day 90. Patients are stratified by their predose TT concentration. The numbers indicate strata that contain patients with predose TT values less than the indicated number down to the number to its left.
Figure 4.(a) Positive and (b) negative PANAS scores of patients with baseline TT concentrations <100 or >100 ng/dL. PANAS score was measured at baseline and then every 30 d.
Figure 5.Change in (a) LH from baseline to day 90 and (b) lean body mass from baseline to day 180 in patients stratified by predose TT concentrations. Line of best fit is indicated.
Figure 6.(a) Visual representation of the addition of testosterone into an active HPG system, which immediately attempts to correct for the excess of testosterone by reducing endogenous testosterone. (b) Visual representation of the suppression of endogenous testosterone production for (i) a patient with more severe TDS, and (ii) a patient with less severe TDS.