| Literature DB >> 31428354 |
Wenwen Deng1, Xia Yang1, Yuan Zhu1, Jiangnan Yu1, Ximing Xu1.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate structural features and antihyperlipidemic effects of the stigma maydis polysaccharide, termed SMP-1. This polysaccharide was composed of D-mannose, L-rhamnose, D-glucose, D-galactose, L-arabinose, D-xylose, and D-galacturonic acid, with a molar ratio of 1.00:0.21:1.41:1.44:0.70:0.44:0.56. The SMP-1 was mainly bonded by (1 → 6) and (1 → 3) linkages, with various monosaccharides being evenly distributed in the main and side chains. Moreover, SMP-1 had neither triple-helical structure nor molecular aggregation. Importantly, the SMP-1 could effectively bind the bile acids in vitro and significantly lower the total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and moderately increase the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in poloxamer 407-induced hyperlipidemic mice. Moreover, pretreatment with SMP-1 (≥300 mg/kg) could remarkably reduce fat accumulation and restore hepatocyte morphology in the liver of hyperlipidemic mice. Altogether, these findings indicated that SMP-1 could be developed as a safe and effective food supplement for preventing and treating hyperlipidemic disorders.Entities:
Keywords: bile acid‐binding; hyperlipidemia; poloxamer 407; stigma maydis polysaccharide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31428354 PMCID: PMC6694425 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Characterization of SMP‐1. (a) The HPGPC chromatogram of SMP‐1, with the retention time of 19.88 min; (b) The UV spectrum of SMP‐1 within the wavelength from 200 to 800 nm; (c) The IR spectrum of SMP‐1 in the wave number region between 4,000 and 400 cm−1; (d) HPLC chromatograms of the monosaccharides (1. PMP; 2. D‐mannose; 3. L‐rhamnose; 4. D‐galacturonic acid; 5. lactose; 6. D‐glucose; 7. D‐galactose; 8. L‐arabinose; 9. D‐xylose; 10. L‐fucose) in the mixture of standard monosaccharides and the SMP‐1
The molar ratios in partial acid hydrolysis analysis of SMP‐1
| Fractions | Molar ratios | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Man | Rha | Glc | Gal | Ara | Xyl | GlcA | |
| SMP‐1 | 1.00 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 1.53 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.00 |
| SMP‐1 | 1.00 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 1.20 ± 0.04 | 1.90 ± 0.02 | 0.79 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
Dialyzable fraction.
Nondialyzable fraction.
Figure 2Chain conformation determination. (a) Changes in maximum absorption wavelength of Conge red and Congo red‐SMP‐1 complex; (b) AFM images of SMP‐1 at the concentration of 5 μg/ml: two‐dimensional (2D) image of SMP‐1 (left) and two‐dimensional (3D) image of SMP‐1 (right)
Figure 3In vitro bile acid‐binding assay. (a) The conjugation rates with cholates (taurocholic acid sodium and glycodeoxycholic acid sodium) varied at different SMP‐1 concentrations (5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/ml); (b) The conjugation rates with cholates (taurocholic acid sodium and glycodeoxycholic acid sodium) changed with the extension of reaction time (15, 30, 60, and 120 min)
Effect of SMP‐1 on serum lipid profile levels in P407‐induced hyperlipidemic mice
| Groups | Serum lipids | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | LDL‐C (mmol/L) | HDL‐C (mmol/L) | |
| NC | 3.55 ± 0.42 | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 0.66 ± 0.13 | 4.05 ± 0.72 |
| MC | 4.40 ± 0.51 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 0.92 ± 0.23 | 3.26 ± 0.42 |
| L‐SMP‐1 | 3.87 ± 0.32 | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 0.75 ± 0.21 | 3.69 ± 0.84 |
| M‐SMP‐1 | 3.62 ± 0.24 | 0.61 ± 0.22 | 0.52 ± 0.09 | 3.71 ± 0.35 |
| H‐SMP‐1 | 3.43 ± 0.80 | 0.45 ± 0.12 | 0.58 ± 0.18 | 3.52 ± 0.31 |
| PC‐1 | 3.36 ± 0.26 | 0.73 ± 0.12 | 0.53 ± 0.20 | 3.36 ± 0.31 |
| PC‐2 | 3.40 ± 0.78 | 0.52 ± 0.20 | 0.54 ± 0.23 | 3.55 ± 0.41 |
PC‐1 and PC‐2 represent Fenofibrate and Zhibituo tablets, respectively.
Values are mean ± SD; n = 7 serum samples from seven mice.
p < 0.05 versus Model control (MC) group;
p < 0.01 versus Model control (MC) group;
p < 0.05 versus Normal control (NC) group;
p < 0.01 versus Normal control (NC) group.
Figure 4Histopathological photomicrographs of mice liver tissues. (a) Normal control group (NC); (b) Model control group (MC); (c) Positive control group 1 (PC‐1, 200 mg/kg of Fenofibrate); (d) Low concentration of SMP‐1 (L‐SMP‐1, 100 mg/kg); (e) Moderate concentration of SMP‐1 (M‐SMP‐1, 300 mg/kg); (f) High concentration of SMP‐1 (H‐SMP‐1, 500 mg/kg)