| Literature DB >> 31428350 |
Luyao Wang1,2,3, Guoxia Dou1, Hongna Guo1, Qiuqing Zhang1, Xiaojie Qin4, Wei Yu1, Chunhao Jiang2, Hongmei Xiao1.
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of antagonistic yeasts are considered as environmental safe fumigants to promote the resistance and quality of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa). By GC-MS assays, VOCs of Hanseniaspora uvarum (H. uvarum) fumigated strawberry fruit showed increased contents of methyl caproate (5.8%), methyl octanoate (5.1%), and methyl caprylate (10.9%) in postharvest cold storage. Possible mechanisms of H. uvarum VOCs involved in regulations of the defense-related enzymes and substances in strawberry were investigated during postharvest storage in low temperature and high humidity (2 ± 1°C, RH 90%-95%). Defense-related enzymes assays indicated H. uvarum VOCs stimulated the accumulation of CAT, SOD, POD, APX, PPO, and PAL and inhibited biosynthesis of MDA in strawberry fruit under storage condition. Moreover, the expression levels of related key enzyme genes, such as CAT, SOD, APX42, PPO, and PAL6, were consistently increased in strawberry fruit after H. uvarum VOCs fumigation.Entities:
Keywords: GC‐MS; Hanseniaspora uvarum; defense‐related enzymes; strawberry; volatile organic compounds
Year: 2019 PMID: 31428350 PMCID: PMC6694596 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Sequence of the primers used for genes expression in strawberry
| Gene | Genebank | Forward primer sequence (5′–3′) | Reverse primer sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| GTGAAAGAAGCGAAGAAGG | GAAGCTCGGAGCAGTATG |
|
|
| GTCTTCTTCGTCCGTGAT | GTAGTTCCCAGCAGCAAT |
|
|
| GGAGGCGGAGCAATAGAGAC | AGCCAGACCCCCTCAATACT |
|
|
| CACAAGGAACGGTCTGGATT | CGCAGCGTATTTCTCAACAA |
|
| – | ATGGTGCTCCTGAAGATGA | TAGAGTGTGGTCCAGTGAG |
| 18S rRNA |
| TGTGAAACTGCGAATGGCTCATTAA | GAAGTCGGGATTTGTTGCACGTATT |
Figure 1Effects of H. uvarum volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to B. cinera and strawberry fruit. (a) H. uvarum VOCs obviously inhibit in vitro growth of B. cinera in 7 days. (b) Changes in appearance of H. uvarum VOC‐treated strawberry fruit (down) and control group (up) after cold storage for 25 days. Three biological replicates were performed for each assay with similar results
Figure 2GC‐MS analysis on strawberry volatile emissions 5 days after H. uvarum volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (a) and mock treatments (b). Three biological replicates were performed for each assay with similar results
Strawberry volatile organic compounds tested 5 days after H. uvarum VOCs treatment and their peak area percentages
| RT (retention time) | Compound name | Molecular formula | Peak area percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAS (registration number) | CK |
| |||
| 1.12 | Nitrogen oxide | N2O | 20621‐02‐7 | 0.18 | 0.64 |
| 1.19 | 2‐aminoethyl alcohol | C2H7NO | 141‐43‐5 | 0.89 | 0.39 |
| 1.27 | Ethyl alcohol | C2H6O | 64‐17‐5 | 1.2 | 0.39 |
| 1.42 | Methyl n‐acetylglycine | C5H9NO3 | 1117‐77‐7 | 7.6 | 4.1 |
| 1.84 | Ethyl acetate | C4H8O2 | 141‐78‐6 | 17.7 | 12.9 |
| 2.90 | Ethyl propionate | C5H10O2 | 105‐37‐3 | 1.8 | 0.26 |
| 3.10 | Methyl butyrate | C5H10O2 | 623‐42‐7 | 0.7 | 3.2 |
| 3.78 | Ethyl isobutyrate | C6H12O2 | 97‐62‐1 | 0.7 | 0.13 |
| 3.97 | Ethyl butyrate | C6H12O2 | 105‐54‐4 | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| 4.13 | Isobutyl acetate | C6H12O2 | 110‐19‐0 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| 4.19 | Methyl 2‐methylbutyrate | C6H12O2 | 868‐57‐5 | – | 0.39 |
| 4.79/4.82 | Ethyl butyrate | C6H12O2 | 105‐54‐4 | 3.5 | 0.13 |
| 5.15 | Butyl acetate | C6H12O2 | 123‐86‐4 | – | 0.13 |
| 5.87 | Propyl butyrate | C11H14O2 | 105‐66‐8 | – | 0.26 |
| 6.07 | Ethyl 2‐methylbutyrate | C7H14O2 | 7452‐79‐1 | 0.7 | 0.77 |
| 6.23 | Ethyl isovalerate | C7H14O2 | 108‐64‐5 | 0.36 | 0.39 |
| 6.95 | Isoamyl acetate | C7H14O2 | 123‐92‐2 | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| 7.38 | Isoamyl acetate | C7H14O2 | 123‐92‐2 | 0.53 | 0.64 |
| 8.41/8.44 | Methyl hexanoate | C7H14O2 | 106‐70‐7 | 3.7 | 5.8 |
| 8.76 | Methyl hex‐3‐enoate | C7H12O2 | 2396‐78‐3 | 0.36 | 0.13 |
| 8.89 | Ethyl tiglate | C7H14O2 | 5837‐78‐5 | 0.53 | 0.39 |
| 9.78 | Methyl ester | C7H12O2 | 13894‐63‐8 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| 10.10 | 2‐Pentanol | C8H16O2 | 108‐84‐9 | 0.18 | 7.1 |
| 10.80/10.82 | Ethyl caproate | C8H16O2 | 123‐66‐0 | 9.8 | 12.9 |
| 11.08 | (E)‐2‐Hexen‐1‐ol | C8H14O2 | 2497‐18‐9 | 1.8 | 3.9 |
| 11.27/11.29 | 2‐Pentanol | C8H16O2 | 108‐84‐9 | 11.5 | 6.4 |
| 11.42/11.45 | Octyl acetate | C10H20O2 | 112‐14‐1 | 12.8 | 8.3 |
| 12.82 | Methoxy‐2,5‐dimethyl‐3(2H)‐furanone | C6H8O2 | 4077‐47‐8 | 3.5 | 1.9 |
| 13.72 | Propyl hexanoate | C9H18O2 | 626‐77‐7 | 0.53 | – |
| 14.65 | Methyl octanoate | C9H18O2 | 111‐11‐5 | 4.4 | 5.1 |
| 16.81/16.86 | Ethyl caprylate | C10H20O2 | 106‐32‐1 | 8.9 | 10.9 |
| 17.59 | Butyric anhydride | C8H14O3 | 106‐31‐0 | 0.53 | – |
| 18.62 | phenethyl acetate | C10H12O2 | 103‐45‐7 | 0.18 | 0.64 |
| 19.20 | 1‐nonanecarboxylic acid | C10H20O2 | 0.18 | – | |
| 19.46 | Tridecane | C13H28 | 629‐50‐5 | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| 19.51 | Ethyl nonanoate | C11H22O2 | 123‐29‐5 | 0.36 | 0.26 |
| 19.92 | Nonyl acetate | C11H22O2 | 143‐13‐5 | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| 22.15 | Ethyl caprate | C12H24O2 | 110‐38‐3 | 0.36 | 0.64 |
| 24.92 | 2,4‐bis(1,1‐dimethylethyl)‐6‐methyl‐ | C15H24O | 616‐55‐7 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| 27.01 | 1,1,1‐trimethyl‐,1,1′,1″‐triester with boric acid (H3BO3) | C9H28Si4 | 4325‐85‐3 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| 29.25 | Heptadecane | C17H36 | 629‐78‐7 | 0.18 | 0.26 |
Figure 3Effect of fumigation with H. uvarum volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on defense‐related enzymes in strawberry fruit during cold storage. (a) APX, (b) SOD, (c) POD, (d) CAT, (e) PPO, (f) PAL. Each value is the mean for three independent replicates. Asterisks indicate statistical differences compared to control according to Duncan's multiple range test at p ≦ 0.05 level. The vertical bar indicates the standard error. Three biological replicates were performed for each assay with similar results
Figure 4Effect of fumigation with H. uvarum volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on MAD content (a) and O2− production rate (b) in strawberry fruit during cold storage. Each value is the mean for three independent replicates. Asterisks indicate statistical differences compared to control according to Duncan's multiple range test at p ≦ 0.05 level. The vertical bar indicates the standard error, and three biological replicates were performed for each assay with similar results
Figure 5Effect of fumigation with H. uvarum volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on expression levels of defense‐related enzyme genes. Expression levels of SOD (a), CAT (b), PAL (c), PPO (d), and APX42 (e) were detected in strawberry fruit during cold storage. Each value is the mean for three independent replicates. Asterisks indicate statistical differences compared to control according to Duncan's multiple range test at p ≦ 0.05 level. The vertical bar indicates the standard error, and three biological replicates were performed for each assay with similar results