| Literature DB >> 31428343 |
Xiangyong Meng1,2, Tingting Li3, Teng Song1, Chang Chen2, Chandrasekar Venkitasamy2, Zhongli Pan2, Huien Zhang4.
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the solubility, structural properties, and immunomodulatory ofEntities:
Keywords: immunomodulation; maillard reaction; rice dreg protein; solubility; structure
Year: 2019 PMID: 31428343 PMCID: PMC6694430 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Solubility of rice dreg, RDP, and PMR and emulsifying stability at different pH. a–cThe different lowercase superscript letters in (a) mean significant differences between RDP, PMR, and rice dreg (p < 0.05); A–Cthe different lowercase superscript letters in bars mean significant differences at different pH value (p < 0.05). a–eThe different lowercase superscript letters in (b) mean significant differences at different pH vlue (p < 0.05)
Comparison of amino acid composition of rice dreg, RDP, and PMR
| Amino acids | PMR g/100 g protein | RDP g/100 g protein | Rice dreg g/100 g protein |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asp | 10.22 ± 1.12a | 8.76 ± 0.88b | 10.49 ± 1.01a |
| Glu | 22.05 ± 2.51a | 20.50 ± 2.12ab | 19.69 ± 1.95b |
| Ser | 3.93 ± 0.63ab | 4.19 ± 0.57a | 3.87 ± 0.40b |
| His | 1.94 ± 0.15c | 2.14 ± 0.30b | 2.36 ± 0.32a |
| Gly | 5.34 ± 0.75a | 4.85 ± 0.57b | 4.43 ± 0.37c |
| Thr | 2.25 ± 0.43c | 3.30 ± 0.42a | 3.03 ± 0.35b |
| Arg | 4.98 ± 0.62b | 8.31 ± 0.82ab | 8.72 ± 0.80a |
| Ala | 6.09 ± 0.81a | 5.70 ± 0.77b | 5.55 ± 0.67c |
| Tyr | 4.03 ± 0.54c | 4.26 ± 0.59b | 4.52 ± 0.45a |
| Cys | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.67 ± 0.06a | 0.73 ± 0.07a |
| Val | 7.07 ± 0.86a | 6.76 ± 0.83b | 6.56 ± 0.77c |
| Met | 3.33 ± 0.42a | 3.18 ± 0.38ab | 2.83 ± 0.17b |
| Phe | 6.26 ± 0.77a | 5.90 ± 0.71b | 5.42 ± 0.49c |
| Ile | 5.22 ± 0.68a | 4.99 ± 0.60ab | 4.85 ± 0.53b |
| Leu | 8.85 ± 0.91a | 8.49 ± 0.73b | 8.15 ± 0.73c |
| Lys | 3.11 ± 0.52b | 3.73 ± 0.61a | 2.99 ± 0.40b |
| Pro | 5.30 ± 0.72b | 4.27 ± 0.55c | 5.81 ± 0.61a |
The different lowercase superscript letters in a row mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Range of molecular weight of the rice dreg, RDP, and its grafted product by HPGPC
| Relative molecular weight (Da) | Rice dreg (%) | RDP (%) | PMR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| >5,000 | 52.83 ± 1.23a | 9.55 ± 0.42b | 54.15 ± 1.28a |
| 5,000–3,000 | 12.67 ± 0.52a | 11.30 ± 0.47b | 5.82 ± 0.29c |
| 3,000–2,000 | 6.02 ± 0.31b | 7.55 ± 0.35a | 4.32 ± 0.18c |
| 2,000–1,000 | 7.33 ± 0.36c | 12.49 ± 0.53a | 8.36 ± 0.37b |
| 1,000–500 | 5.22 ± 0.24c | 12.34 ± 0.51a | 8.53 ± 0.37b |
| 500–180 | 4.55 ± 0.21c | 11.12 ± 0.47a | 8.91 ± 0.37b |
| <180 | 11.38 ± 0.49b | 35.65 ± 0.96a | 9.90 ± 0.42c |
The different lowercase superscript letters in a row mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Secondary structure of RDP, RDP, and PMR
| α‐helix (%) | β‐pleated sheet (%) | β‐turn (%) | Random coil (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice dreg | 5.41 ± 0.25a | 47.98 ± 0.78a | 29.40 ± 0.56a | 24.09 ± 0.52c |
| RDP | 1.42 ± 0.11c | 15.63 ± 0.43b | 17.16 ± 0.45b | 65.58 ± 0.81b |
| PMR | 4.24 ± 0.20b | 4.54 ± 0.22c | 2.37 ± 0.17c | 88.95 ± 0.86a |
The different lowercase superscript letters in a column mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2FTIR spectra of RDP and PMR
Figure 3Effect of PMR on spleen index, thymus index, phagocytic index, and lymphocyte proliferation of immunodeficient mice. I: Blank; II: Model group; III: PMR + CY group (80 mg/kg); IV: PMR + CY group (160 mg/kg); V: PMR + CY group (320 mg/kg). A–D, a–dThe different superscript letters in bars mean significant differences between different treatment groups (p < 0.05)