Literature DB >> 31428247

National Analysis of Risk Factors for Nasal Fractures and Associated Injuries in Trauma.

Tiffany T Pham1, Ellen Lester1, Areg Grigorian1, Rachel E Roditi2, Jeffry T Nahmias1.   

Abstract

Nasal fractures account for up to 58% of facial fractures. However, the literature characterizing associated injuries and risk factors for nasal fractures is sparse and is mostly composed of single-center experiences. This study sought to provide a large descriptive analysis and identify associated injuries and risk factors for nasal fractures in trauma using a national database. A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2007 to 2015 was performed. Patients ≥18 years of age with nasal fractures were included. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors for nasal fracture in trauma. Of 5,494,609 trauma patients in the NTDB, 255,533 (4.6%) had a nasal fracture. Most were male (74.8%) with a mean age of 45.6 years. Blunt trauma accounted for 90.5% of fractures, with motor vehicle accident being the most common mechanism (27.5%). Closed fractures occurred in 93.0% of patients. Concomitant injuries included traumatic brain injury (TBI; 56.9%), malar/maxillary fracture (27.9%), and open wound of the face (38.6%) and nose (9.5%). Of all patients, 10.1% underwent closed or open reductions at index hospitalization. The strongest associated injuries with nasal fracture included open wound of the nose (odds ratio [OR]: 8.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.49-8.94, p  < 0.001), epistaxis (OR: 5.26, 95% CI: 4.59-6.02, p  < 0.001), malar/maxillary fracture (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 4.30-4.45, p  < 0.001), and orbital fracture (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 3.91-4.06, p  < 0.001). Nasal fractures are common traumatic injuries with more than 90% occurring by blunt mechanism and over half suffering from a concomitant TBI. The strongest associated injury with nasal fracture is an open wound of the nose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Trauma Data Bank; epidemiology; facial fractures; nasal fractures; risk factors; trauma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31428247      PMCID: PMC6697477          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  38 in total

1.  AIS 2005: a contemporary injury scale.

Authors:  Thomas A Gennarelli; Elaine Wodzin
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Open vs closed approach to the nasal pyramid for fracture reduction.

Authors:  Michael J Reilly; Steven P Davison
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

3.  Relation between epistaxis, external nasal deformity, and septal deviation following nasal trauma.

Authors:  M Daniel; U Raghavan
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Technique and timing for closed reduction of isolated nasal fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Gerd Jürgen Ridder; Carsten Christof Boedeker; Milo Fradis; Jörg Schipper
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.697

Review 5.  Nasal fracture management: minimizing secondary nasal deformities.

Authors:  R J Rohrich; W P Adams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The influence of airbag and restraining devices on the patterns of facial trauma in motor vehicle collisions.

Authors:  R X Murphy; K L Birmingham; W J Okunski; T Wasser
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  The impact of airbags and seat belts on the incidence and severity of maxillofacial injuries in automobile accidents in New York State.

Authors:  J Mouzakes; P J Koltai; S Kuhar; D S Bernstein; P Wing; E Salsberg
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-10

8.  A retrospective analysis of facial fracture etiologies.

Authors:  Detlev Erdmann; Keith E Follmar; Marlieke Debruijn; Anthony D Bruno; Sin-Ho Jung; David Edelman; Srinivasan Mukundan; Jeffrey R Marcus
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Facial fractures and concomitant injuries in trauma patients.

Authors:  Aijaz Alvi; Taylor Doherty; Gregory Lewen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  An analysis of 3599 midfacial and 1141 orbital blowout fractures among 4426 United States Army Soldiers, 1980-2000.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Shere; Jason R Boole; Michael R Holtel; Paul J Amoroso
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  Facial Fractures: Independent Prediction of Neurosurgical Intervention.

Authors:  Brandon Lucke-Wold; Kevin Pierre; Sina Aghili-Mehrizi; Gregory Joseph Anatol Murad
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Facial fractures and associated injuries in high- versus low-energy trauma: all are not created equal.

Authors:  Cameron St Hilaire; Arianne Johnson; Caitlin Loseth; Hamid Alipour; Nick Faunce; Stephen Kaminski; Rohit Sharma
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-06-24

3.  Facial Fractures: Independent Prediction of Neurosurgical Intervention.

Authors:  Brandon Lucke-Wold; Kevin Pierre; Sina Aghili-Mehrizi; Gregory Joseph Anatol Murad
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-12-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.