Literature DB >> 31427964

Traditional Chinese Medicine for Coronary Heart Disease: Clinical Evidence and Possible Mechanisms.

Ke-Jian Zhang1, Qun Zheng1, Peng-Chong Zhu1, Qiang Tong1, Zhuang Zhuang1, Jia-Zhen Zhu1, Xiao-Yi Bao1, Yue-Yue Huang1, Guo-Qing Zheng2, Yan Wang1.   

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a major cause of mortality with a huge economic burden on healthcare worldwide. Here, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for CHD based on high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and summarized its possible mechanisms according to animal-based researches. 27 eligible studies were identified in eight database searches from inception to June 2018. The methodological quality was assessed using seven-item checklist recommended by Cochrane Collaboration. All the data were analyzed using Rev-Man 5.3 software. As a result, the score of study quality ranged from 4 to 7 points. Meta-analyses showed CHM can significantly reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention, and cardiovascular mortality (P < 0.05), and increase systolic function of heart, the ST-segment depression, and clinical efficacy (P < 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 11 studies, and CHMs were well tolerated in patients with CHD. In addition, CHM exerted cardioprotection for CHD, possibly altering multiple signal pathways through anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidation, anti-apoptosis, improving the circulation, and regulating energy metabolism. In conclusion, the evidence available from present study revealed that CHMs are beneficial for CHD and are generally safe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Traditional Chinese medicine; clinical evidence; coronary heart disease; high-quality randomized controlled trials; possible mechanisms; systematic review

Year:  2019        PMID: 31427964      PMCID: PMC6688122          DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pharmacol        ISSN: 1663-9812            Impact factor:   5.810


Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) incurs a huge economic burden on healthcare and society (Dunbar et al., 2018). According to the epidemiological data from 1990 to 2013, 92.94 million people were suffering from this disease, which eventually led to 8.1 million deaths (Murray et al., 2015; Roth et al., 2015). Current treatments for CHD include coronary revascularization, drug intervention, risk factor control, cardiac rehabilitation, and lifestyle improvement (Arslan et al., 2018). Among them, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting are the most effective (Roffi et al., 2016). However, PCI is mainly for the treatment of locally severe stenotic vessels and has limited therapeutic effect on extensive coronary stenosis and microcirculation lesions (Heusch and Gersh, 2017). Meanwhile, the prognosis of patients treated with PCI is sometimes not ideal because myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, no reflow, coronary dissection, stent thrombosis, and acute coronary occlusion still exist (Hausenloy and Yellon, 2013; Arslan et al., 2018). Although the technology of coronary intervention is still improving and conventional medicine is constantly updating, novel treatments that can stabilize arterial plaque, improve microcirculation, and angina symptoms; prevent acute myocardial infarction; delay the development of ischemic cardiomyopathy; ultimately reduce PCI; and improve prognosis are urgently needed. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) includes herbal medicine (CHM), acupuncture, and other non-pharmacological therapies, which is a holistic approach to health and healing (Xu et al., 2013). CHM has been used to treat CHD for thousands of years, and in modern time, many claimed randomized controlled trials (RCT) have reported some TCM Fufang exerted the cardioprotective function (Han et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2010; Chung et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2013). However, most of these studies are poor methodological quality, leading that there is still insufficient evidence to support routine use of CHMs for CHD. Thus, the Cochrane group guidelines for clinical reviews may exclude the ‘‘not-so-good’’ studies (Chan et al., 2012). In addition, in a TCM reviewing process, researchers may need to include such high-quality studies about a medical certain issue to identify current problems and areas worthy of improvement for its future development (Chan et al., 2012). Thus, we performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of CHM for CHD according to high-quality studies with at least four domains of “yes” in Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool (Li et al., 2015).

Methods

Search Strategy and Study Selection

Studies estimating the efficacy of CHMs in patients with CHD were systematically searched from EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Wangfang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP database (VIP), and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) from inception to the end of June 2018. The key words were used as follows: “coronary disease OR acute coronary syndrome OR myocardial infarction OR myocardial ischemia” AND “herb OR traditional Chinese medicine OR Chinese Materia Medica.” Moreover, reference lists of potential articles were searched for relevant studies.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria were prespecified as follows: (1) RCTs that investigated the efficacy and safety of CHM for CHD were included. Quasi-randomized trials, such as those in which patients were allocated according to date of birth and order of admission number, were excluded. If a three-arm design was used in a study, we extracted data only for the group(s) involving CHM and the control group(s). (2) All participants were patients with a diagnosis of CHD based on one of the following criteria: (1) The guideline of unstable or stable angina from Chinese cardiovascular association in different years, (2) the guideline of unstable or stable angina from American College of Cardiology (ACC) or American Heart Association (AHA) or European Society of Cardiology (ESC) or World Health Organization (WHO) in different years, (3) be diagnosed by coronary angiography, (4) patients after PCI, and (5) diagnostic criteria made by other authors with comparable definitions were also used. (3) The treatment interventions included CHMs used as monotherapies or adjunct with conventional medicine (i.e., antiplatelet, stable plaque, control ventricular rate) or supportive treatment (i.e., nutrition support, exercise therapy, psychotherapy). Interventions for control group were restricted to no intervention, placebo, conventional medicine, and supportive treatment. Studies comparing a CHM agent with another CHM agent were excluded. (4) The primary outcome measures were the incidence of myocardial infarction and/or the incidence of PCI and/or cardiovascular mortality and/or the level of ST-segment depression and/or indicators which represent systolic and diastolic function of the heart in cardiac ultrasound. The secondary outcome measures were clinical effective rating, and the safety of co-administration of CHM. The exclusion criteria were prespecified as follows: (1) no predetermined outcome index; (2) compared or combined with other Chinese herb medicine; (3) not randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled designed; (4) no control group; and (5) double publication.

Data Extraction

Two authors independently reviewed each included study and extracted following aspects of details: (1) name of first author, year of publication; (2) diagnostic criteria; (3) detail information of participants for each study, including sample size, gender composition, and mean age; (4) detail information of treatment and control group, including therapeutic drug dosage, method of administration, and duration of treatment; and (5) outcome measures and intergroup differences. The data of predetermined primary and secondary outcomes were extracted for further qualitative and quantitative syntheses. We made efforts to contact authors for further information when some records’ published data were only in graphical format or not in the publication. And the numerical values were measured from the graphs by digital ruler software when response was not received from authors.

Risk of Bias in Individual Studies

The methodological quality of each included study was evaluated by two authors with the seven-item checklist recommended by Cochrane Collaboration (Higgins and Green, 2012). Only RCTs with a cumulative score of at least four points were included in our systematic review. Any disagreements from two authors were dealt with through discussion with the corresponding author (GQZ).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted via RevMan version 5.3. A fixed-effects model (FEM) or random-effects model (REM) was conducted to analyze pooled effects. When the outcome measurements in all included studies in meta-analysis were based on the same scale, weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals was calculated as a summary statistic, otherwise standard mean difference (SMD) was calculated. Heterogeneity between study results was investigated based on a standard chi-square test and I2 statistic. A fixed-effects model (I2 < 50%) or a random-effects model (I2 > 50%) was used depending on the value of I2. Funnel plots were used to visually estimate publication bias. A probability value 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

CHM Composition and Possible Mechanisms of Active Ingredients

Specific herbs in the CHM formulae were recorded. The frequency of use for particular herb was calculated and those used at a high frequency that are described in detail. Animal-based mechanism studies of active ingredients from frequently used herbs were searched. The following information was recorded for such studies: identity of active ingredients and their herbal sources, suggested mechanisms and implicated signaling pathways, first author’s name and publication year of the citation, and structure of active ingredients.

Results

Study Selection

A total of 2,158 studies were retrieved after systematical searches from the database, of which 287 were reduplicated and irrelevant studies. After screening title and abstract, 180 were excluded because they were: (1) animal trial, (2) case report, (3) review article, and (4) meeting abstract. After reviewing the full text of the remaining 87 articles, 60 studies were excluded if: (1) no predetermined outcome index; (2) compared or combined with other CHM; (3) not randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled designed; (4) no control group; (5) double publication; and (6) data of result was not available. Ultimately, 27 studies with Cochrane RoB score ≧4 (Lu et al., 2006; Qiao et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Cheng et al., 2009; Chu et al., 2010; Qiu et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Wang Y. G. et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Shang et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017) were selected ( ).
Figure 1

Summary of the process for identifying candidate studies.

Summary of the process for identifying candidate studies.

Characteristics of Included Studies

17 studies (Lu et al., 2006; Qiao et al., 2006; Cheng et al., 2009; Chu et al., 2010; Qiu et al., 2009; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Wang Y. G. et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017) were published in Chinese and 10 studies (Lu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010; Chu et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Shang et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016) in English between 2006 and 2017. All studies were conducted in China. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 57 to 4,870 with a total of 11,732 participants, including 5,916 patients in treatment groups and 5,816 patients serving as controls. Of 27 included studies, 18 studies (Cheng et al., 2009; Qiu et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2011; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Shang et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017) were based on patients with angina pectoris of CHD and nine studies (Lu et al., 2006; Qiao et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Chu et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016) were based on patients with acute coronary syndrome. Comparisons of CHM plus a conventional treatment (i.e., antiplatelet, stable plaque, control ventricular rate) versus a conventional treatment were conducted in 26 trials, and comparisons of CHM versus a placebo were performed in one trial (Hu et al., 2014). The CHMs were administered orally (i.e., tablets, capsules, granules, or decoction). The duration of follow-up was varied from 4 weeks to 4.5 years. All studies accounted for baseline comparability. The incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) was utilized as outcome measure in 10 studies (Lu et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2011; Shang et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016), the incidence of PCI in five studies (Lu et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016), cardiovascular mortality in seven studies (Lu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2013; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in five studies (Qiao et al., 2006; Qiu et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2013; Sun, 2014; Mao et al., 2016), the ventricular wall motion score in two studies (Qiao et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2013), and the level of ST-segment elevation in three studies (Chu et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014). The efficiency of angina improved was reported in 12 studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017), the usage of nitroglycerin in two studies (Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2014), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in four studies (Lu et al., 2008; Wang Y. G. et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in two studies (Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012), the degree of coronary artery stenosis in two studies (Lu et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2017), and the rate of coronary restenosis in two studies (Shang et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2014). The overall characteristics of included studies are shown in .
Table 1

Characteristics of the 27 included studies.

Study (years)Diagnostic criteriaNumber of participants (male/female), mean age (years)InterventionsConventional medicine or basic treatmentDuration of treatmentOutcome indexIntergroup differences
TrialControlTrialControl
Lu et al., 2006 After PCI6058.94 ± 10.795857.1 ± 9.81Xiongshao capsule (0.5g, tid, p.o).PlaceboClopidogrel, aspirin; atorvastatin, low molecular weight heparin6 months1. Cardiovascular mortality2. The rate of coronary restenosis3. The degree of coronary artery stenosis4. The efficiency of angina pectoris5. Myocardial infarction rate6. The incidence of PCI1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.055. P < 0.056. P < 0.05
Qiao et al., 2006 After PCI30 (17/13)64.0 ± 11.229 (18/11)65.7 ± 12.2Tongguan capsule (three doses, tid, p.o).PlaceboAnticoagulant, antiplatelet, anti-infection1 month1. LVEF2. The ventricular wall motion score3. Survey of angina pectoris in Seattle1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.05
Lu et al., 2008 Documented previous myocardial infarction2,42958.35 ± 9.022,44158.35 ± 9.02Xuezhikang capsule (0.6g, bid, p.o).PlaceboOther drugs that do not affect blood lipids4.5 years1. Myocardial infarction rate2. Cardiovascular mortality3. The incidence of PCI4. TC5. TG6. HDL-C7. LDL-C1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.015. P < 0.016. P < 0.017. P < 0.01
Cheng et al., 2009 The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 200741 (37/4)49.97 ± 6.1941 (39/2)51.12 ± 7.33Qingre Quyu granule (6g, bid, p.o).PlaceboAspirin, bisoprolol fumarate, isosorbide dinitrate sustained release tablets25 weeks1. Number of atherosclerotic plaques2. Arterial plaque score3. Intima thickness of carotid artery4. hsCRP1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.05
Qiu et al., 2009 The guideline of acute myocardial infarction from China, 200151 (45/6)57.82 ± 10.2352 (44/8)55.79 ± 11.06Compound Salvia tablet and Xinyue capsulePlaceboAntiplatelet agents, anticoagulant, β blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, nitrates, and lipid-regulating drugs3 months1. LVEF1. P < 0.05
Wang et al., 2009 The guideline of unstable angina pectoris from ACC/AHA USA, 200232 (12/20)61.65 ± 8.1531 (13/18)64.47 ± 9.21Shenshao tablet (0.3g, qd, p.o).PlaceboAspirin, isosorbide, mononitrate, simvastatin, Benner Pury, amlodipine,metoprolol4 weeks1. Frequency of angina pectoris2. Seattle score3. The incidence of PCI4. Acute myocardial infarction rate1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P > 0.054. P > 0.05
Chu et al., 2010 After PCI28 (18/10);61.7 ± 9.629 (20/9);58.8 ± 8.9Xuefu Zhuyu capsulePlaceboClopidogrel, aspirin, low molecular weight heparin, metoprolol tartrate, atorvastatin4 weeks1. The efficiency of angina pectoris2. Electrocardiogram curative effect3. Survey of angina pectoris in Seattle1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.05
Zhang et al., 2010 The guideline of segment elevation myocardial infarction from WHO108 (92/16)58.5 ± 10.6111 (96/15)57.6 ± 11.2Tongxinluo (2.08g, qd, p.o).PlaceboAspirin, clopidogrel180 days1. The incidence of no reflow of myocardium1. P = 0.0031
Shang et al., 2011 The guideline of stable angina pectoris from WHO73 (50/23)67.79 ± 4.7779 (52/27)66.7 ± 4.16Chuangxiongol (250mg, tid, p.o).PlaceboAspirin, tilopidine, diltiazem, nitroglycerin, heparin6 months1. Restenosis rate2. The efficiency of angina pectoris3. Cardiovascular mortality4. Acute myocardial infarction rate5. The incidence of PCI 1. P > 0.052. P < 0.013. P > 0.054. P > 0.055. P > 0.05
Mo et al., 2012 The guideline of criteria for the naming and diagnosis of ischemic heart disease60 (43/17)67.15 ± 4.8760 (42/18)66.22 ± 5.12Yixin Mai granule (one dose, tid, p.o).PlaceboIsosorbide, metoprolol, fosinopril, aspirin4 weeks1. hsCRP2. IL-63. IL-184. The efficiency of angina pectoris1. P < 0.012. P < 0.013. P < 0.014. P = 0.037
Wang S. H. et al., 2012 The guideline of unstable angina pectoris from ACC/AHA USA, 200233 (26/7)60.2 ± 933 (25/8)62.7 ± 7.1Tablets of betel (1.5g, bid, p.o).PlaceboAspirin, simvastatin, isosorbide, dinitrate28 days1. The efficiency of angina pectoris2. Electrocardiogram efficiency3. Nitroglycerin consumption4. hsCRP5. sCD40L1. P < 0.052. P > 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.055. P < 0.05
Wang Y. G. et al., 2012The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 20077672Double ginseng capsule and Tongguan capsule (four doses, tid, p.o).PlaceboOriginal treatment6 months1. TG2. TC3. HDL-C4. LDL-C1. P < 0.052. P > 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.05
Chen et al., 2013 After PCI30 (17/13)65.5 ± 7.530 (16/14)63.8 ± 6.3Tongguan capsule (three doses, tid, p.o).PlaceboClopidogrel, aspirin, low molecular weight heparin3 months1. LVEF2. The ventricular wall motion score3. The number of endothelial progenitor cell in peripheral blood 1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.05
Shang et al., 2013 The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 20041,746 (1,191/555)58.35 ± 9.021,759 (1,260/499)58.28 ± 8.99QSYQ (0.5g, tid, p.o).PlaceboAntihypertensive drugs, hypoglycemic agent, lipid-lowering medicine12 months1. Cardiovascular mortality2. Myocardial infarction rate3. The incidence of PCI 1. P > 0.052. P > 0.053. P > 0.05
Hu et al., 2014The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 200719257.82 ± 10.239957.82 ± 10.23Reachable film (three doses, tid, p.o).PlaceboNM4 weeks1. The efficiency of angina pectoris2. The total curative effect of TCM Syndrome3. Electrocardiogram efficiency1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.05
Liu et al., 2014 The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 200712059.21 ± 7.9212060.64 ± 7. 69Chek Shincen Tongxin granulePlaceboAspirin, atorvastatin4 weeks1. Body limitation2. Stable state of angina pectoris3. Episodes of angina pectoris4. Satisfaction with treatment5. The degree of understanding of disease6. Electrocardiogram efficiency1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.055. P < 0.056. P < 0.05
Lu et al., 2014 After PCI90 (48/42)60.2 ± 6.990 (46/44)61.8 ± 7.2Tongxinluo capsule (three doses, tid, p.o).PlaceboOriginal treatment12 months1. The incidence of coronary restenosis2. The degree of coronary restenosis3. The efficiency of angina pectoris4. Myocardial infarction rate5. Cardiovascular mortality1. P < 0.052. P < 0.013. P = 0.044. P = 0.195. P > 0.05
Sun, 2014 The guideline of chronic unstable angina from China, 200764 (42/22)70.81 ± 10.76 64 (44/20)69.8 ± 10.98 Musk Baoxin pill (two doses, tid, p.o).PlaceboIsosorbide dinitrate tablets, atorvastatin, thiazepine, enteric aspirin6 months1. The efficiency of angina pectoris2. Myocardial infarction rate3. Cardiovascular mortality4. Nitroglycerin consumption5. Electrocardiogram efficiency6. LVEF1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P > 0.054. P < 0.015. P < 0.056. P < 0.05
Xu et al., 2014The guideline of unstable angina pectoris from ACC/AHA USA, 200255 (29/26)69.47 ± 859 (33/26)70.41 ± 8.6Shenzhu Guanxin recipe (12g, qd, p.o).PlaceboConventional western medicine (unspecified)12 weeks1. The efficiency of angina pectoris2. The duration of angina pectoris3. Total use of nitroglycerin4. The degree of physical activity induced by angina pectoris5. The degree of angina pectoris1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.055. P < 0.01
Xu et al., 2015After PCI113 (86/27)70.35 ± 9.6174 (51/23)68.08 ± 10.38Shenzhu Guanxin recipePlaceboAspirin, ticplopidine, diltiazem, glyceryl, trinitrate, heparin3 months1. Angina pectoris score2. Cardiovascular mortality3. Myocardial ischemia rate1. P = 0.662. P = 0.333. P = 0.63
Zhang et al., 2015 The guideline of unstable angina pectoris from ACC/AHA USA, 2002119 (56/63)59.46 ± 6.524120 (52/68)58.82 ± 7.061Wufuxinnaoqing capsulesPlaceboAntiplatelet, aggregation, ACEI or ARB, statin two hydrogen arsenide12 weeks1. The efficiency of angina pectoris2. Nitroglycerin consumption1. P < 0.012. P < 0.01
Duan et al., 2016 The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 200764 (38/26)59.7 ± 6.3467 (47/20)60.7 ± 6.44Live heart pill (two doses, tid, p.o).PlaceboConventional western medicine (unspecified)8 weeks1. Symptom score of angina pectoris2. Nitroglycerin consumption3. Electrocardiogram plate movement4. Seattle scale5. Syndromes of traditional Chinese Medicine6. hsCRP7. Blood lipid1. P < 0.012. P < 0.013. P < 0.014. P < 0.015. P < 0.016. P > 0.057. P > 0.05
Mao et al., 2016 After PCI4267.54 ± 8.394168.38 ± 10.41Danlou tabletPlaceboConventional western medicine (unspecified)90 days1. Left ventricular end diastolic volume index2. End systolic volume index of left ventricle3. LVEF4. Cardiovascular mortality5. Myocardial infarction rate1. P < 0.0012. P < 0.0013. P < 0.0014. P < 0.055. P < 0.05
Wang et al., 2016 The guideline of unstable angina pectoris from ACCF/AHA USA, 2007109 (72/37)62.89 ± 9.23110 (74/36)63.89 ± 10.03Danlou tablet (4.5g, qd, p.o).PlaceboAntiplatelet, aggregation, anticoagulant, lipid-lowering, improvement of myocardial, remodeling, step-down90 days1. Cardiovascular mortality2. Myocardial infarction rate3. Reconstructive rate of blood vessels4. Troponin5. hsCRP1. P > 0.052. P = 0.043. P > 0.054. P > 0.055. P > 0.05
Zhu et al., 2016 The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 200776 (48/28)51.8 ± 1.6 74 (46/28)51. 5 ± 1. 4 Traditional Chinese medicine prescription (10 mg, tid, p.o).PlaceboIsosorbide, aspirin, atorvastatin4 weeks1. The efficiency of angina pectoris2. Electrocardiogram efficiency3. TG4. TC5. HDL-C6. LDL-C7. TCM syndrome score1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.055. P < 0.056. P < 0.057. P < 0.05
Wang et al., 2017 The guideline of unstable angina pectoris from ACC/AHA USA, 201140 (17/23)70.68 ± 6.8740 (21/19)71.65 ± 4.32Xuesaitong soft capsule (0.66g, bid, p.o).PlaceboConventional western medicine (unspecified)4 weeks1. TC2. TG3. HDL4. LDL5. Survey of angina pectoris in Seattle1. P < 0.052. P < 0.053. P < 0.054. P < 0.055. P < 0.05
Yang et al., 2017 The guideline of chronic stable angina from China, 201433 (20/13)61.18 ± 6.6133 (21/12)61.03 ± 7.51Coronary Ningtong prescriptionPlaceboAspirin enteric-coated tablets, simvastatin tablets, isosorbide mononitrate, metoprolol24 weeks1. Coronary stenosis2. The efficiency of angina pectoris1. P < 0.052. P < 0.05

PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; hsCRP, high sensitive C reactive protein; TC, total cholesterol; TG, total glycerol three fat; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; STEMI, segment elevation myocardial infarction; WHO, world health organization; NM, not mention; QSYQ, Qi-Shen-Yi-Qi dripping pills.

Characteristics of the 27 included studies. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; hsCRP, high sensitive C reactive protein; TC, total cholesterol; TG, total glycerol three fat; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; STEMI, segment elevation myocardial infarction; WHO, world health organization; NM, not mention; QSYQ, Qi-Shen-Yi-Qi dripping pills.

Study Quality

The quality score of study ranged from 4 to 7 in a total of 7 points. Of which, six studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016) got 7 points, three studies (Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2016) got 6 points, 15 studies (Qiao et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Cheng et al., 2009; Qiu et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Shang et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017) got 5 points, and three studies (Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Yang et al., 2017) got 4 points. All 27 included studies had random allocation, including 10 (Qiao et al., 2006; Cheng et al., 2009; Qiu et al., 2009; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Zhu et al., 2016) in which a random number table was used, eight (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2011; Wang Y. G. et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Duan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017) that employed a computer generated random sample set, three (Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016) that applied block randomization, and six (Lu et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Mao et al., 2016) that stated that randomization was used without providing methodological details. Of the 27 included studies, all studies reported blinding of participants and personnel and withdraw bias. Additionally, nine studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016) reported using allocation concealment; eight studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016) applied blinding specifically during outcome measure assessment, and 22 studies (Lu et al., 2006; Qiao et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Cheng et al., 2009; Chu et al., 2010; Qiu et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Shang et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017) reported selective reporting. No study provided sample size estimation information. The methodological quality is concluded in .
Table 2

Quality assessment of included studies.

StudyABCDEFGTotal
Lu et al., 2006 11111117
Qiao et al., 2006 10101115
Lu et al., 2008 10101115
Chu et al., 2010 11111117
Cheng et al., 2009 10101115
Qiu et al., 2009 10101115
Wang et al., 2009 11111117
Zhang et al., 2010 10101115
Shang et al., 2011 10101115
Mo et al., 2012 10101115
Wang S. H. et al., 2012 10101115
Wang Y. G. et al., 2012 10101115
Chen et al., 2013 10101115
Shang et al., 2013 10101115
Lu et al., 2014 10101014
Hu et al., 2014 10101115
Liu et al., 2014 11111117
Sun, 2014 10101014
Xu et al., 2014 10101115
Xu et al., 2015 11111117
Zhang et al., 2015 11111016
Duan et al., 2016 11111016
Mao et al., 2016 11101116
Wang et al., 2016 11111117
Zhu et al., 2016 10101115
Wang et al., 2017 10101115
Yang et al., 2017 10101014

A, adequate sequence generation; B, concealment of allocation; C, blinding of participants and personnel; D, blinding of outcome assessment; E, incomplete out-come data; F, selective reporting; G, other bias; 1, low risk of bias, the information of the domain was adequate in the text; 0, high risk of bias, the information of the domain was inadequate in the text.

Quality assessment of included studies. A, adequate sequence generation; B, concealment of allocation; C, blinding of participants and personnel; D, blinding of outcome assessment; E, incomplete out-come data; F, selective reporting; G, other bias; 1, low risk of bias, the information of the domain was adequate in the text; 0, high risk of bias, the information of the domain was inadequate in the text.

Effectiveness

The Incidence of MI and PCI

Meta-analysis of 10 studies (Lu et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2011; Shang et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016) found a significant difference in favor of CHM for decreasing the incidence of MI compared with control group (n = 9510, OR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.41, 0.63), P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) ( ). Meta-analysis of five studies (Lu et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016) showed CHM existed significant effect for decreasing the incidence of PCI compared with control group (n = 8775, OR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.51, 0.86), P = 0.002, I2 = 0%) ( ).
Figure 2

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for decreasing the incidence of myocardial infarction compared with control group.

Figure 3

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for decreasing the incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention compared with control group.

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for decreasing the incidence of myocardial infarction compared with control group. The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for decreasing the incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention compared with control group.

Cardiovascular Mortality

Seven studies (Wang et al., 2009; Shang et al., 2013; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016) reported cardiovascular mortality as the outcome measure. Of which, there were no deaths were found in three studies (Lu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2016). Meta-analysis of remaining four studies (Shang et al., 2013; Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016) showed CHM existed significant effect for decreasing cardiovascular mortality compared with control group (n = 9,060, OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58,0.93, P = 0.009, I2 = 15%) ( ).
Figure 4

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for decreasing the cardiovascular mortality compared with control group.

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for decreasing the cardiovascular mortality compared with control group.

Systolic and Diastolic Functions of the Heart in Cardiac Ultrasound and the Level of ST-Segment Depression in Electrocardiogram

For systolic function, five studies (Qiao et al., 2006; Qiu et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2013; Sun, 2014; Mao et al., 2016) showed CHM existed significant effect for increasing LVEF compared with control group (P < 0.05). For diastolic function, there was no study involving related indicators as outcome measure. Two studies (Qiao et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2013) showed that CHM could decrease the ventricular wall motion score compared with control (P < 0.05). In addition, meta-analysis of three studies (Chu et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014) reported that CHM can increase degree of decline in the ST-segment compared with control (n = 473, OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.64∼3.83, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) ( ).
Figure 5

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for increasing degree of decline in the ST segment compared with control group.

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for increasing degree of decline in the ST segment compared with control group.

Clinical Efficacy

Compared with controls, meta-analysis of 12 studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2014; Sun, 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017) showed that the efficiency of angina improved more obviously in the TCM group than that in the control group (n = 1711, OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.17∼0.26, P = 0.09, I2 = 41%) ( ); two studies (Sun, 2014; Xu et al., 2014) for reducing the usage of nitroglycerin (n = 242, MD = -0.71, 95%CI: -0.91∼-0.51, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) ( ), four studies (Lu et al., 2008; Wang Y. G. et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017) for reducing LDL (n = 5,248, SMD = -0.67, 95%CI: -0.73∼-0.61, P < 0.00001,I2 = 0%) ( ), two studies (Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012) for reducing hsCRP (n = 182, OR = -0.95, 95% CI: -1.26∼0.64, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) ( ), two studies (Lu et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2017) for reducing the degree of coronary artery stenosis (P < 0.05), and two studies (Shang et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2014) for reducing the rate of coronary restenosis (P < 0.05).
Figure 6

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for improving the efficiency of angina compared with control group.

Figure 7

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for reducing the usage of nitroglycerin compared with control group.

Figure 8

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for reducing low density lipoprotein.

Figure 9

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for reducing hypersensitive C-reactive protein.

The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for improving the efficiency of angina compared with control group. The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for reducing the usage of nitroglycerin compared with control group. The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for reducing low density lipoprotein. The forest plot: effects of Chinese herbal medicine for reducing hypersensitive C-reactive protein.

The Safety of Co-Administration of CHM

Adverse events were reported in 11 studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010; Shang et al., 2011; Shang et al., 2013; Sun, 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017), analyzed but not observed in four studies (Lu et al., 2008; Cheng et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2014), and not analyzed in 12 studies (Qiao et al., 2006; Qiu et al., 2009; Mo et al., 2012; Wang S. H. et al., 2012, Wang Y. G. et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017). In the 11 studies with adequate information about adverse events, a total of 106/5,134 (2.06%) patients suffered adverse events in the treatment groups and 118/5,167 (2.28%) patients in control groups. Gastrointestinal discomfort symptoms, including nausea, stomachache, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, and constipation, were the most frequently occurring adverse events, affecting 74/106 (69.8%) patients in the treatment groups and 80/118 (67.8%) in control group patients. Allergy, hemorrhage, hepatic insufficiency, headache, and urinary tract infection were reported frequently also, affecting 20/106 (18.8%) patients in the treatment groups and 26/118 (22.0%) of patients in the control groups. The majority of above adverse events were mild and resolved by stopping related drugs and symptomatic treatment. Although some serious adverse events such as heart failure (1/106), cerebral hemorrhage (1/106), pericardial tamponade (1/106), coronary bypass surgery (1/106), and death (1/106) were reported in the two groups, there was no significant difference between the two groups.

Ingredients of CHM Formulae and Frequently Used Herbs

The ingredients of CHM in each RCT are listed in . The most frequently used herbs across all formulae were Miltiorrhiza (nine formulae), pseudo-ginseng (seven formulae), ginseng (seven formulae), Radix Paeoniae rubra (six formulae), Astragalus membranaceus (five formulae), rhizome of Chuanxiong (five formulae), leech (five formulae), borneol (five formulae), and safflower (four formulae). Chinese Angelica, Achyranthes bidentata, Rehmannia glutinosa, peach kernel, liquorice, hawthorn, Trichosanthes, Cinnamomum, Poria, aloes, Rhizoma Corydalis, and ginkgo biloba were also frequently used.
Table 3

Ingredients of Chinese herbal medicine formulae.

Study (years)PrescriptionIngredients of herb prescriptionUsage of prescriptionPreparationsQuality control
Chu et al., 2010 Xuefu Zhuyu capsulePeach kernel, Angelica sinensis, rhizome of Chuanxiong, safflower, Radix Paeoniae rubra, Radix Rehmanniae, Fructus aurantii, Radix Bupleuri, Platycodon grandiflorum, Radix Achyranthis bidentatae, and liquorice3#tid poCapsuleTraditional Chinese patented medicine WY: Z12020223
Qiao et al., 2006 Chen et al., 2013 Tongguan capsule Astragalus membranaceus, Miltiorrhiza, leech, etc.3#tid poCapsuleProduced by The Second Affiliated Hospital Of Guangzhou University Of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Cheng et al., 2009 Qingre Quyu granule Fructus trichosanthis 15g, Miltiorrhiza 30g, hawthorn 30g, Fritillaria thunbergii 10g, pseudo-ginseng 3g, Lignum Millettiae 30g, and the seed of cowherb 15g1#bid poDecoctionProduced by China Pharmaceutical Materials Group Company
Lu et al., 2006 Shang et al., 2011 Xiongshao capsuleRhizome of Chuanxiong and Radix Paeoniae rubra 2#tid poCapsuleUnreported
Wang et al., 2017 Xuesaitong soft capsulePseudo-ginseng2#bid poCapsuleTraditional Chinese patented medicine WY: Z19990022
Mo et al., 2012 Yixin Mai granuleGinseng, cassia twig, Fructus trichosanthis, leech, and Poria cocos 1#tid poDecoctionProduced by Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Liu et al., 2014 Red ginseng Tongxin granule Radix Paeoniae rubra 10g, Agilawood 1g, Angelica sinensis 10g, orange peel 10g, Rhizoma Corydalis 6g, rhizome of Chuanxiong 6g, Miltiorrhiza 10g, astragalus 6g, peach kernel 10g, and safflower 10gUnreportedDecoctionProduced by Jiangyin Tianjiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Zhu et al., 2016 Traditional Chinese medicine prescriptionHawthorn, Miltiorrhiza, ginkgo leaf, lentil, Psoralea, sapanwood, Ganoderma, Polygonum multiflorum, Cornus officinalis, Alisma orientalis, Radix Paeoniae alba, cinnamon, Pericarpium Citri reticulatae, liquorice, Fructus cnidii, cicada slough, and Ramuli Umcariae Cumuncis 1#tid poCapsuleUnreported
Wang et al., 2009 Shenshao tabletRadix Paeoniae alba and ginseng4#tid poTabletTraditional Chinese patented medicine WY: Z19990059
Xu et al., 2015 Xu et al., 2014 Shenzhu Guanxin recipeGinseng 5g, Rhizoma Atractylodis 10g, Radix Notoginseng 10g, Rhizoma Pinelliae 10g, leech 3g, Radix Panacis quinquefolium 5g, and Folium nelumbinis 15g50ml qd poDecoctionProduced by Jiangxi Jiangyin Pharmaceutical Factory
Wang et al., 2012 Wang et al., 2016 Mao et al., 2016 Danlou tablet Fructus trichosanthis, Allium macrostemon, the root of kudzu vine, rhizome of Chuanxiong, Miltiorrhiza, Radix Paeoniae rubra, Alisma orientalis, Astragalus membranaceus, Curcuma aromatica, and Drynaria rhizome4.5g qd poTabletTraditional Chinese patented medicine WY: YBZ17382006
Zhang et al., 2010 Lu et al., 2014 Tongxinluo capsuleGinseng, leech, scorpion, red peony root, cicada slough, soil turtle worm, centipede, sandalwood, Lignum acronychiae, frankincense, jujube nut, and borneolBefore PCI: 8# qd poAfter PCI: 4#tid poCapsuleTraditional Chinese patented medicine WY: Z19980015
Qiu et al., 2009 Compound Salvia tablet and Xinyue capsule Miltiorrhiza 450mg, pseudo-ginseng 141mg, borneol 8mg, ginseng 50mgUnreportedCapsuleTraditional Chinese patented medicine WY: Z44023372 and Z20030073
Hu et al., 2014 Kodaling tabletRhizoma Corydalis 3#tid poTabletProduced by Zhejiang KangEnbei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Duan et al., 2016 Live heart pillGinseng, Radix Aconiti carmichaeli, Ganoderma lucidum, safflower, musk, bezoar, bear bile, pearl, toad venom, and borneol2#tid poTabletTraditional Chinese patented medicine WY: Z44021835
Zhang et al., 2015 WufuxinnaoqingSafflower oil, borneol, vitamin E, and vitamin B62#tid poCapsuleProduced by Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
Lu et al., 2008 Xuezhikang capsuleRed yeast Chinese rice600mg bid poCapsuleProduced by the Beijing WBL PekingUniversity Biotech Co. Ltd.
Shang et al., 2013 Qi-Shen-Yi-Qi dripping pills Miltiorrhizae, pseudo-ginseng, Lignum Dalbergiae odoriferae, and Astragalus membranaceus 0.5g tid poPillUnreported in detail
Yang et al., 2017 Coronary Ningtong prescription Astragalus membranaceus 30g, Miltiorrhiza 30g, mulberry parasitism 30g, Gynostemma pentecox 30g, hawthorn 30g, the root of kudzu vine 30g, Herba Rhodiolae 30g, Fructus trichosanthis 15g, Allium macrostemon 15g, Rhizoma Pinellinae praeparata 15g, immature bitter orange 10g, safflower 10g, Rhizoma Sparganii 10g, Zedoaria 10g, Rhizoma coptidis 6g, pseudo-ginseng 3g, and leech 3g100ml bid poDecoctionUnreported
Sun, 2014 Musk Baoxin pillartificial musk, ginseng, cinnamon, toad venom, storax, artificial bezoar, and borneol2#tid poPillProduced by Shanghai and Huangyao Pharmaceutical Industry
Wang et al., 2012Double ginseng capsule And Tongguan capsule Miltiorrhiza, ginseng, Herba Rhodiolae, pseudo-ginseng and Lignum Dalbergiae odoriferae 4#tid poCapsuleProduced by Shaanxi Pharmaceutical Group Shaanxi New Drug Technology Development Center

d, day; #: tablet; PCI, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Co., Ltd, Company Limited.

Ingredients of Chinese herbal medicine formulae. d, day; #: tablet; PCI, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Co., Ltd, Company Limited.

Possible Mechanism of Herbal Benefits for CHD

A total of 45 experimental studies (Jormalainen et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2008; He et al., 2008; Nizamutdinova et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010; Liu and Niu, 2011; Liu et al., 2011; Pan et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2011; Zhai et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Lv et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2013; Lim et al., 2013; Tu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Yin et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; He et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Park et al., 2014; Qian et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2014; Tao et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2014; Xue et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014; Deng et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2016; Leng et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2016; Meng et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2016) were identified in our electronic searches to investigate the effects and mechanisms of the main active components of single flavored Chinese medicine which were frequently used on I/R injury models ( ). The possible mechanisms of them are summarized as follows: (1) oxidative stress is important reaction after myocardial ischemia. The function of free radical scavenging system is decreased in myocardial ischemia. Large amounts of free radicals was produced by the unbalanced endogenous antioxidant systems, which further leads to the peroxidation of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, the biochemical alteration (reducing SOD, and GSH-Px, and increasing MDA), and further led to cardiomyocyte death (Yellon and Hausenloy, 2007). Based on these observations, antioxidant therapy is the key step considered to prevent I/R injury. In our study, Salvia miltiorrhiza, salvianolic acid B, tanshinone IIA, notoginsenoside R1, ginsenoside Rb1, ginsenoside Rb3, astragaloside IV, and ligustrazine could enhance SOD (Chan et al., 2012; Lv et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2014; Xue et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2015) and attenuate chondriokinesis to reduce the release of MDA (Liu et al., 2011; Chan et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2014; Xue et al., 2014; Xia et al., 2015); borneol, ginsenoside Rd, and hydroxysafflor yellow A could reduce ROS (He et al., 2008; Liu and Niu, 2011; Wang et al., 2013). S. miltiorrhiza and hydroxysafflor yellow A (Hu et al., 2016) exhibit antioxidant effects via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway; tanshinone IIA (Wei et al., 2014) increases NADPH oxidase via AMPK/Akt/PKC pathway; and astragaloside IV (Zhang et al., 2014) could reduce ROS via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Our study showed TCM could improve the antioxidant function to reduce the damage of myocardial ischemia. (2) Apoptosis was an energy-requiring programmed cell death (Zhang and Xu, 2000). Apoptosis can be activated extrinsically by sarcolemmal receptors such as FAS: FAS(CD 95) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (Kleinbongard et al., 2011), or intrinsically by cytochrome c which initiates the caspase cascade activation result in intracellular proteolysis. In addition, the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) conduces the mitochondrial matrix swelling, then leading to rupture of the outer membrane and release of cytochrome c, activating the caspase cascade, ultimately resulting in the apoptotic cell death (Heusch et al., 2010). Proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins of the Bcl family interact with the MPTP (Baines, 2009). In present study, S. miltiorrhiza, salvianolic acid A, salvianolic acid B, paeonol, paeoniflorin, ginsenoside Rb1, ginsenoside Rb3, ginsenoside Rd, ginsenoside Rg3, and ligustrazine could increase Bcl-2 expression (Nizamutdinova et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2010; Zhai et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Fan et al., 2016) and the Bcl-2/Bax ratio (Nizamutdinova et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2011; Zhai et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2016). Three studies (Wang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2016) reported that salvianolic acid A, tanshinone IIA, and ginsenoside Rb1 exhibit anti-apoptotic effects via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and one study (Wang et al., 2013) reported that ginsenoside Rd could decrease caspase-3 and caspase-9 activities. (3) The inflammation during myocardial I/R injury was reviewed by previous studies (Marchant et al., 2012). The excessive inflammation can lead to cardiomyocyte damage. When the myocardium got reperfused, the NF-κB pathway was activated by pattern recognition receptors, culminating in promoted cytokine expression. S. miltiorrhiza, tanshinone I, tanshinone IIA, paeonol, notoginsenoside r1, ginsenoside Re, ginsenoside Rg1, ligustrazine, astragaloside IV, and astragalus polysaccharides were shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects by decreasing TNF-alpha (Zhang et al., 2010; Lim et al., 2013; Tu et al., 2013; Deng et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2015), IL-6 (Chen et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010), IL-8 (Li et al., 2014), and NF-κB (Tu et al., 2013; Qian et al., 2014; Deng et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015). Two studies (Qian et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2013) reported that ligustrazine and astragalus polysaccharides exhibit anti-inflammatory effects via inhibiting P38MAPK pathway, and one study (Zhang et al., 2010) reported that tanshinone IIA could decrease TNF-alpha and IL-6 via PI3K/Akt pathway. (4) Nitric oxide is an essential modulator of cardiovascular system. The NO can decrease intracellular calcium concentration in vascular smooth muscle cells, which further induces vasodilation (Schulz et al., 2004). Salvianolic acid B, tanshinone IIA, ginsenoside Rb1, ginsenoside Rg3, ligustrazine, astragaloside IV, and hydroxysafflor yellow A were shown to improve circulation by increasing NO expression (Liu et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Pan et al., 2011; Lv et al., 2012; Leng et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015) via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation (Liu et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Pan et al., 2011; Lv et al., 2012; Leng et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015). (5) S. miltiorrhiza and notoginsenoside r1 were shown to regulate energy metabolism via p-JNK-NF-kappaB-TRPC6 pathway (Meng et al., 2016) and ROCK-dependent ATP5D modulation separately (He et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014). (6) Hirudin was shown to attenuate coagulation and enhance microvascular flow during reperfusion (Jormalainen et al., 2004). Thus, antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, circulation improvement, anti-inflammatory, and energy metabolism regulation actions have been promoted as important mechanisms of herbal compounds used to treat I/R injury.
Table 4

Mechanisms of the main active components of single flavored Chinese Medicine on organic injury induced by ischemia/reperfusion.

Active ingredientsHerb sourcePossible mechanisms (signaling pathway) CitationStructure
Salvia miltiorrhizaMiltiorrhiza1. Regulation of energy metabolism (p-JNK-NF-kappaB-TRPC6 pathway)2. Attenuation of oxidative stress (Akt/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway)3. Anti-inflammation4. Anti-apoptosis (increase expression of Bcl-2 and increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio, affect Akt, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation)1. Meng et al., 20162. Hu et al., 20163. Yin et al., 20134. Yu et al., 2015; Fan et al., 2016
Salvianolic acid AMiltiorrhiza1. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio via JNK/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway)1. Chen et al., 2016
Salvianolic acid BMiltiorrhiza1. Improve circulation (increase expression of NO via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation)2. Attenuation of oxidative stress (increase SOD and decrease MDA)3. Anti-apoptosis1. Pan et al., 20112. Xue et al., 20143. Xue et al., 2014
Tanshinone IMiltiorrhiza1. Anti-inflammation1. Park et al., 2014
Tanshinone IIAMiltiorrhiza1. Improve circulation (increase expression of NO via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation)2. Attenuation of oxidative stress (increase SOD and HO-1, decrease MDA, increase NADPH oxidase via AMPK/Akt/PKC pathway)3. Anti-inflammation (decrease TNF-alpha and IL-6 via PI3K/Akt-dependent pathway)4. Anti-apoptosis (decrease caspase-3 activity via Akt/FOXO3A/Bim-mediated signal pathway)1. Pan et al., 20112. Tang et al., 2014; Wei et al., 20143. Zhang et al., 20104. Zhang et al., 2013
PaeonolRadix Paeoniae rubra1. Anti-inflammation2. Anti-apoptosis (increase expression of Bcl-2 and increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio)1. Ma et al., 20162. Nizamutdinova et al., 2008
Paeoniflorin Radix Paeoniae rubra 1. Anti-apoptosis (increase expression of Bcl-2 and increased Bcl-2/Bax ratio)1. Tang et al., 2010
Notoginsenoside r1Pseudo-Ginseng1. Anti-inflammation (decrease IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha)2. Regulation of energy metabolism (ROCK-dependent ATP5D modulation)3. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2 expression)4. Attenuation of oxidative stress (increase SOD, and decrease MDA)5. Attenuation of endoplasmic reticulum stress1. Chen et al., 2008; Li et al., 2014; Xia et al., 20152. He et al., 2014; Li et al., 20143. Liu et al., 20104. Xia et al., 20155. Yu et al., 2016
Ginsenoside Rb1Ginseng1. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2 expression and increased Bcl-2/Bax ratio via PI3K/Akt pathway)2. Attenuation of oxidative stress (increase SOD, and decrease MDA)3. Improve circulation (increase NO expression via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation)1. Wang et al., 2008; Wu et al., 20112. Chan et al., 20123. Leng et al., 2015
Ginsenoside Rb3Ginseng1. Attenuation of oxidative stress (increase SOD, and decrease MDA)2. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2 expression and increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio)1. Liu et al., 20142. Liu et al., 2014
Ginsenoside RdGinseng1. Attenuation of oxidative stress (decrease ROS)2. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2 expression and increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio, decrease caspase-3 and caspase-9 activity via mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathway)1. Wang et al., 20132. Wang et al., 2013
Ginsenoside ReGinseng1. Anti-inflammation (decrease TNF-alpha)1. Lim et al., 2013
Ginsenoside Rg1Ginseng1. Anti-inflammation (decrease TNF-alpha and IL-1beta, in part via the NF-κB signaling pathway)1. Tao et al., 2014; Deng et al., 2015
Ginsenoside Rg3Ginseng1. Attenuation of oxidative stress (increase SOD)2. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2 expression and increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio)3. Improve circulation (increase NO expression via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation)1. Wang et al., 20152. Wang et al., 20153. Wang et al., 2015
BorneolBorneol1. Attenuation of oxidative stress (decrease ROS)1. Liu and Niu, 2011
LigustrazineRhizome of Chuanxiong 1. Attenuation of oxidative stress (increase SOD and decrease MDA)2. Improve circulation (increase NO expression via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation)3. Anti-inflammation (decrease the expression of NF-κB via inhibiting P38MAPK pathway)4. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2 expression and increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio)1. Liu et al., 2011; Lv et al., 20122. Lv et al., 20123. Qian et al., 20144. Zhai et al., 2011
Astragaloside IVAstragalus membranaceus1. Promoting angiogenesis (increase the expression of VEGF)2. Anti-apoptosis (increase Bcl-2 expression and increase Bcl-2/Bax ratio, decrease caspase-3)3. Anti-inflammation (decrease the expression of TNF-alpha and NF-κB)4. Improve circulation (increase NO expression via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation)5. Attenuation of oxidative stress (reduce ROS to via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway)1. Yu et al., 20152. Tu et al., 2013; Lu et al., 20153. Tu et al., 2013; Lu et al., 20154. Liu et al., 20105. Zhang et al., 2014
Astragalus polysaccharidesAstragalus membranaceus1. Anti-inflammatory (via the p38 MAPK signaling pathway)1. Zhu et al., 2013
HirudinLeech1. Attenuate coagulation and enhance microvascular flow during reperfusion1. Jormalainen et al., 2004
Hydroxysafflor yellow ASafflower1. Attenuation of oxidative stress (Akt/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway, decrease ROS)2. Improve circulation (increase NO expression via up-regulating eNOS phosphorylation)1. He et al., 2008; Hu et al., 20162. Liu et al., 2008

HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; SOD, super oxide dismutase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; MDA, malonaldehyde; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB.

Mechanisms of the main active components of single flavored Chinese Medicine on organic injury induced by ischemia/reperfusion. HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; SOD, super oxide dismutase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; MDA, malonaldehyde; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB.

Discussion

Summary of Evidence

This is the first clinical systematic review of 27 high-quality RCTs involving 11,732 participants to estimate the efficacy and safety of CHMs for CHD. The evidence available from present study revealed that CHMs are beneficial for CHD and are generally safe. In addition, CHM exerted cardioprotection for CHD, possibly altering multiple signal pathways through anti-inflammation, anti-oxidation, anti-apoptosis, circulation improvement, and energy metabolism regulation.

Limitations

First, there were still some methodological weaknesses in the primary studies although we included high-quality studies. Only nine of the 27 included studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016) reported allocation concealment, and eight included studies (Lu et al., 2006; Chu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016) reported blinding during outcome assessment. It is worth noting that an average 18% more “beneficial” effect in trials with inadequate or unclear concealment of allocation compared with adequate concealment (Higgins and Green, 2012). And blinding during outcome assessment is an essential method to avoid systemic errors which existed in the outcome assessment of non-blinded studies (Higgins and Green, 2012). Second, English and Chinese literatures were included only in present study and the absence of studies written in other languages may generate selective bias in a certain degree. Third, no included trials were reported to have been registered, and negative findings were less likely to be published, which may lead to the efficacy being overestimated.

Implications

The findings from present study indicate that CHM paratherapy is beneficial for CHD and is well tolerated. Thus, we recommended, at least to an extent, to use CHMs for CHD, especially selected case. Further study should identify specific CHM and/or indications of CHM. In addition, the findings of the most frequently used herbs such as Miltiorrhiza, pseudo-ginseng, ginseng, Radix Paeoniae rubra, Astragalus membranaceus, rhizome of Chuanxiong, leech, borneol, and safflower and their main active components should be considered as further development of herbal prescriptions and component injection for CHD. Some methodological weaknesses still existed in the primary studies. Recommendations for further research are as follows: (1) the CONSORT 2010 statement (Schulz et al., 2010), CONSORT for TCM (Bian et al., 2011), RCTs investigating CHM (Flower et al., 2012), and CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017 (Cheng et al., 2017) should be abided by for the design. (2) Clinic trials should be registered in a generally accessible database (www.clinicaltrials.com) prior to first case inclusion. It allows verification of predefined study hypothesis and end-points of the study, which would help to the report of negative findings and reduce publication bias (Rongen and Wever, 2015). (3) In view of trials with insufficient statistical power that runs the risk of over estimating therapeutic efficacy (Kjaergard et al., 2001), the further studies are recommended to provide statistical information of sample size estimation. (4) In order to ensure the efficacy of TCM, the identity and quantity of the herbal preparations should be described clearly in further research. (5) The safety of TCM has been increasingly concerned by both medical workers and the public. The frequency of use for particular herb was calculated and those used at a high frequency that are described in detail in the part 3.6 and . The high-frequency herbs that we selected can ignite the treatment based on syndrome differentiation according to the herbal functions . Ginseng and Astragalus membranaceus benefit qi; Miltiorrhiza, pseudo-ginseng, Radix Paeoniae rubra, rhizome of Chuanxiong, leech, and safflower promote blood circulation for removing blood stasis; and borneol has function of resuscitation with aromatics for relieving pain. Thus, we can also deduce that the main patterns of CHD are qi deficiency and blood stasis. The selected high-frequency herbs are composed of a herbal prescription for CHD, which can be used for clinic and as a candidate for RCT.
Table 5

Different syndromes of coronary heart disease and the classification of herbs according to syndrome differentiation therapy for different syndromes.

SyndromeSyndrome differentiation therapy for different syndromes Representative herbs in the theory of traditional Chinese medicine mentioned in present study
Syndrome of coagulation cold in heart vessel1. Dispelling cold2. Dredging channel blockade and yang 1. Cinnamon, Psoralea, Ramuli Umcariae Cumuncis2. Angelica sinensis, radix Paeoniae rubra, pseudo-ginseng, rhizome Of Chuanxiong, frankincense, Miltiorrhiza, safflower, peach kernel, rhizoma Corydalis, leech, soil turtle worm, Lignum Millettiae, ginkgo leaf, sapanwood, red yeast Chinese, Allium macrostemon
Syndrome of qi stagnation in heart and chest 1. Dispersing stagnated liver qi for regulating qi-flowing1. Hawthorn, Fructus aurantii, Lignum acronychiae, Agilawood, radix Bupleuri, rhizoma Corydalis
Syndrome of blockade of heart blood 1. Promoting blood circulation for removing blood stasis1. Angelica sinensis, radix Paeoniae rubra, pseudo-ginseng, rhizome Of Chuanxiong, frankincense, Miltiorrhiza, safflower, peach kernel, rhizoma Corydalis, leech, soil turtle worm, Lignum Millettiae, ginkgo leaf, sapanwood, red yeast Chinese rice
Syndrome of turbid phlegm blocking heart 1. Dredging yang for resolving turbidity2. Eliminating phlegm for resolving masses1. Allium macrostemon2. Rhizoma Pinelliae, liquorice, Platycodon grandiflorum, Fritillaria thunbergii, orange peel
Syndrome of deficiency of both qi and yin1. Benefiting qi and nourishing yin2. Promoting blood circulation for dredging vessels1. Angelica sinensis, ginseng, Astragalus Membranaceus, radix Panacis quinquefolium, Rhizoma Atractylodis, liquorice2. Radix Paeoniae Rubra, pseudo-ginseng, rhizome Of Chuanxiong, frankincense, Miltiorrhiza, safflower, peach kernel, rhizoma Corydalis, leech, soil turtle worm, Lignum Millettiae, ginkgo leaf, sapanwood, red yeast Chinese rice, musk
Syndrome of yin deficiency of heart and kidney1. Nourishing yin and clearing heat2. Activating blood circulation for nourishing heart1. Angelica sinensis, borneol, Cassia twig, cicada slough, Fructus trichosanthis, Fritillaria thunbergii, orange peel, Folium nelumbinis, bezoar, bear bile, pearl, toad venom, Gynostemma pentecox, Rhizoma Coptidis, liquorice2. Radix Paeoniae rubra, pseudo-ginseng, rhizome of Chuanxiong, frankincense, Miltiorrhiza, safflower, peach kernel, rhizoma Corydalis, leech, soil turtle worm, Lignum Millettiae, ginkgo leaf, sapanwood, red yeast Chinese rice
Syndrome of yang deficiency of heart and kidney1. Warmly tonifying yang qi and inspiring heart yang1. Ginseng, Astragalus Membranaceus, radix Panacis quinquefolium, Rhizoma Atractylodis, liquorice, Ganoderma, Herba Rhodiolae
Different syndromes of coronary heart disease and the classification of herbs according to syndrome differentiation therapy for different syndromes. Cardioprotection by anti-inflammation, antioxidant, anti-apoptosis, and circulation improvement for myocardial I/R injury (Xu et al., 2014) was an innovative strategy for antagonizing the injurious biochemical and molecular events that eventually resulted in irreversible ischemic injury (Wu and He, 2010). The included preclinical trials presented the main active components of the most frequently used herbs that performed anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidation, anti-apoptosis, energy metabolism regulation, and circulation improvement mechanisms in multiple models of I/R injury through multiple signal pathways, including the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, AMPK/Akt/PKC pathway, PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathway, P38MAPK pathway, eNOS phosphorylation, and p-JNK-NF-kappaB-TRPC6 pathway. Further studies of CHM for CHD should explore the multi-drug, multi-target signal pathway using novel techniques such as network pharmacological approach.

Conclusion

The findings from present study indicate that CHMs are beneficial for CHD and are generally safe. In addition, CHM exerted cardioprotection for CHD, possibly altering multiple signal pathways through anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidation, anti-apoptosis, circulation improvement, and energy metabolism regulation mechanisms.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: GQZ, YW, KJZ, and QZ. Acquisition, analysis and/or interpretation of data: QZ, KJZ, JZZ, XYB, QT, PCZ, ZZ, YYH, GQZ, YW. Final approval and overall responsibility for this published work: GQZ and YW.

Funding

This project was supported by the grant of National Natural Science Foundation of China (81573750/81473491/81173395/H2902).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  80 in total

Review 1.  DNA fragmentation in apoptosis.

Authors:  J H Zhang; M Xu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 25.617

2.  Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.

Authors:  L L Kjaergard; J Villumsen; C Gluud
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Myocardial reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek M Yellon; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Paeonol and paeoniflorin, the main active principles of Paeonia albiflora, protect the heart from myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Irina Tsoy Nizamutdinova; Yong Chun Jin; Ju Sun Kim; Min Hye Yean; Sam Sik Kang; Yeong Shik Kim; Jae Heun Lee; Han Geuk Seo; Hye Jung Kim; Ki Churl Chang
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Recombinant hirudin enhances cardiac output and decreases systemic vascular resistance during reperfusion after cardiopulmonary bypass in a porcine model.

Authors:  Mikko Jormalainen; Antti E Vento; Ulla Wartiovaara-Kautto; Raili Suojaranta-Ylinen; O Juhani Rämö; Jari Petäjä
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Effect of notoginsenoside R1 on hepatic microcirculation disturbance induced by gut ischemia and reperfusion.

Authors:  Wei-Xing Chen; Fang Wang; Yu-Ying Liu; Qing-Jiang Zeng; Kai Sun; Xin Xue; Xiang Li; Ji-Ying Yang; Li-Hua An; Bai-He Hu; Jin-Hui Yang; Chuan-She Wang; Zhi-Xin Li; Lian-Yi Liu; Yan Li; Jun Zheng; Fu-Long Liao; Dong Han; Jing-Yu Fan; Jing-Yan Han
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Evidence that hydroxysafflor yellow A protects the heart against ischaemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening.

Authors:  Yi-Na Liu; Zhong-Min Zhou; Peng Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 8.  Nitric oxide in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Rainer Schulz; Malte Kelm; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 10.787

9.  [Clinical study on effect of xiongshao capsule on restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention].

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Lu; Da-Zhuo Shi; Hao Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi       Date:  2006-01

Review 10.  Ameliorating effects of compounds derived from Salvia miltiorrhiza root extract on microcirculatory disturbance and target organ injury by ischemia and reperfusion.

Authors:  Jing-Yan Han; Jing-Yu Fan; Yoshinori Horie; Soichiro Miura; De-Hua Cui; Hiromasa Ishii; Toshifumi Hibi; Hiroshi Tsuneki; Ikuko Kimura
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 12.310

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evidence and Characteristics of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Coronary Heart Disease Patients With Anxiety or Depression: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Baofu Wang; Yu Teng; Yang Li; Sijia Lai; Yang Wu; Shiqi Chen; Tong Li; Xiaowan Han; Hufang Zhou; Yu Wang; Ziwen Lu; Haiyan Li; Yukun Ding; Liang Ma; Mingjing Zhao; Xian Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 5.988

2.  Complementary and alternative therapies for stable angina pectoris of coronary heart disease: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guanyu Wang; Feiran Li; Xu Hou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  The Efficacy and Safety of Compound Danshen Dripping Pill Combined with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Cailan Li; Qian Li; Jiamin Xu; Wenzhen Wu; Yuling Wu; Jianhui Xie; Xiaobo Yang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Study of the Mechanism of Action of Guanxin Shutong Capsules in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease Based on Metabolomics.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Chang Shi; Zhen-Hua Ge; Yu-Xi Wei; Tian-Tian Liu; Yue Wang; Xin-Feng Zhou; Zi-Jun Yang; Wei-Ting Wang; Yan-Wen Zhang; Xue-Hui Zhu; Jun Zhang; Ying Li; Min Gong; Xiao-Hui Wu; Hong-Quan Duan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  The effect of Huoxue Huayu decoction on restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Hou; Xuhao Li; Xingxin Wang; Tiantian Dong; Jiguo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine on the Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Yang Jiang; Qi Zhao; Lin Li; Shumin Huang; Shuai Yi; Zhixi Hu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Evidence and Potential Mechanisms of Traditional Chinese Medicine for the Adjuvant Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Wei; Qi-You Ding; Chak Yeung; Yi-Shan Huang; Bo-Xun Zhang; Li-Li Zhang; Run-Yu Miao; Sha Di; Lin-Hua Zhao; Xiao-Lin Tong
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.061

8.  LianXia Formula Granule Attenuates Cardiac Sympathetic Remodeling in Rats with Myocardial Infarction via the NGF/TrKA/PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Sai-Sai Li; Nan Kang; Xiang-Lei Li; Jing Yuan; Ruby Ling; Ping Li; Jia-Li Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Knowledge Mapping of Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels (Danggui) Research: A Scientometric Study.

Authors:  Cuncun Lu; Ming Liu; Wenru Shang; Yuan Yuan; Meixuan Li; Xiuxiu Deng; Huijuan Li; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 10.  Current Status and Evaluation of Randomized Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Xi Guo; Xiaojun Chen; Jinlan Chen; Zhiping Tan; Yifeng Yang; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.