Literature DB >> 31427877

Cross Education Training Effects are Evident with Twice Daily, Self-Administered Band Stretch Training.

Sarah L Caldwell1, Reagan L S Bilodeau1, Megan J Cox1, David G Behm1.   

Abstract

Currently there are recommendations for stretching type, repetitions and duration within a training session to improve flexibility. It is, however, unclear whether multiple daily stretch training sessions provide greater flexibility than single daily sessions. The objective was to investigate the effectiveness of single (1×day) versus twice daily (2×day) unilateral stretch training sessions on hip flexion range of motion (ROM), agonist and antagonist force and jump performance of the stretched and contralateral, non-stretched legs. Groups included a control, 1×day and 2×day stretch training groups. Static stretching (SS) involved self-administered (stretch band), unilateral, hamstrings and quadriceps stretching for 2-weeks. Pre- and post-testing involved hip flexion ROM, knee extension and flexion maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) forces and unilateral drop jumps (DJ). The 2×day group showed a 12.8% (p = 0.08) greater active ROM versus Control. The 1×day group showed a 7.5% (p=0.1) ballistic ROM increase with no significant changes with the 2×day and Control groups. The stretched leg experienced a 5.01% (p = 0.1) hip flexion ballistic ROM increase contrasting with a 2.3% increase for the contralateral leg. Twice daily training provided 7.1% (p = 0.07) and 6.6% (p = 0.01) quadriceps MVC force increases of the stretched trained and contralateral legs respectively. Contralateral DJ height improved 22.6% (p = 0.002) with 2×day training. In conclusion, 1xday and 2×day stretch training tended to improved ballistic and active ROM respectively, whereas 2×day training improved MVIC force and DJ height. The findings may apply to fitness enthusiasts and rehabilitation as unilateral stretching may retain performance and active ROM of the stretched and contralateral limbs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexibility; crossover effect; power; strength; stretch frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31427877      PMCID: PMC6683624     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  29 in total

Review 1.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.

Authors:  William J Kraemer; Kent Adams; Enzo Cafarelli; Gary A Dudley; Cathryn Dooly; Matthew S Feigenbaum; Steven J Fleck; Barry Franklin; Andrew C Fry; Jay R Hoffman; Robert U Newton; Jeffrey Potteiger; Michael H Stone; Nicholas A Ratamess; Travis Triplett-McBride
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Acute bouts of upper and lower body static and dynamic stretching increase non-local joint range of motion.

Authors:  David George Behm; Tyler Cavanaugh; Patrick Quigley; Jonathan Christopher Reid; Priscyla Silva Monteiro Nardi; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  The impact of instability resistance training on balance and stability.

Authors:  Kenneth Anderson; David G Behm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Neuro-physiological adaptations associated with cross-education of strength.

Authors:  Jonathan P Farthing; Ron Borowsky; Philip D Chilibeck; Gord Binsted; Gordon E Sarty
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position stand: The use of instability to train the core in athletic and nonathletic conditioning.

Authors:  David G Behm; Eric J Drinkwater; Jeffrey M Willardson; Patrick M Cowley
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.665

Review 6.  The use of instability to train the core musculature.

Authors:  David G Behm; Eric J Drinkwater; Jeffrey M Willardson; Patrick M Cowley
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.665

7.  Unilateral plantar flexors static-stretching effects on ipsilateral and contralateral jump measures.

Authors:  Josinaldo Jarbas da Silva; David George Behm; Willy Andrade Gomes; Fernando Henrique Domingues de Oliveira Silva; Enrico Gori Soares; Érica Paes Serpa; Guanis de Barros Vilela Junior; Charles Ricardo Lopes; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  A comparison of self-administered proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation to static stretching on range of motion and flexibility.

Authors:  Jason Wicke; Kamar Gainey; Michael Figueroa
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Influence of chronic stretching on muscle performance: Systematic review.

Authors:  D M Medeiros; C S Lima
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 10.  Non-local muscle fatigue: effects and possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Dale W Chapman; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more
  3 in total

1.  Training and Detraining Effects Following a Static Stretching Program on Medial Gastrocnemius Passive Properties.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Kaoru Yahata; Shigeru Sato; Ryosuke Kiyono; Riku Yoshida; Taizan Fukaya; João Pedro Nunes; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  The Effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Yijinjing Qigong Exercise for the Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis on the Pain, Dysfunction, and Mood Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shuaipan Zhang; Guangxin Guo; Xing Li; Fei Yao; Zhiwei Wu; Qingguang Zhu; Min Fang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-11

3.  Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength.

Authors:  Konstantin Warneke; Michael Keiner; Martin Hillebrecht; Stephan Schiemann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.