Literature DB >> 31427733

A meta-analysis of 1,119 manipulative experiments on terrestrial carbon-cycling responses to global change.

Jian Song1,2, Shiqiang Wan3,4, Shilong Piao5,6,7, Alan K Knapp8,9, Aimée T Classen10,11, Sara Vicca12, Philippe Ciais5,13, Mark J Hovenden14, Sebastian Leuzinger15, Claus Beier16, Paul Kardol17, Jianyang Xia18,19, Qiang Liu5, Jingyi Ru2, Zhenxing Zhou2, Yiqi Luo20, Dali Guo21, J Adam Langley22, Jakob Zscheischler23,24, Jeffrey S Dukes25, Jianwu Tang26, Jiquan Chen27, Kirsten S Hofmockel28,29, Lara M Kueppers30,31, Lindsey Rustad32, Lingli Liu33, Melinda D Smith8,9, Pamela H Templer34, R Quinn Thomas35, Richard J Norby36, Richard P Phillips37, Shuli Niu38, Simone Fatichi39, Yingping Wang40, Pengshuai Shao41, Hongyan Han41, Dandan Wang2, Lingjie Lei2, Jiali Wang2, Xiaona Li2, Qian Zhang2, Xiaoming Li2, Fanglong Su2, Bin Liu2, Fan Yang2, Gaigai Ma2, Guoyong Li2, Yanchun Liu2, Yinzhan Liu2, Zhongling Yang2, Kesheng Zhang2, Yuan Miao2, Mengjun Hu2, Chuang Yan2, Ang Zhang2, Mingxing Zhong2, Yan Hui2, Ying Li2, Mengmei Zheng2.   

Abstract

Direct quantification of terrestrial biosphere responses to global change is crucial for projections of future climate change in Earth system models. Here, we synthesized ecosystem carbon-cycling data from 1,119 experiments performed over the past four decades concerning changes in temperature, precipitation, CO2 and nitrogen across major terrestrial vegetation types of the world. Most experiments manipulated single rather than multiple global change drivers in temperate ecosystems of the USA, Europe and China. The magnitudes of warming and elevated CO2 treatments were consistent with the ranges of future projections, whereas those of precipitation changes and nitrogen inputs often exceeded the projected ranges. Increases in global change drivers consistently accelerated, but decreased precipitation slowed down carbon-cycle processes. Nonlinear (including synergistic and antagonistic) effects among global change drivers were rare. Belowground carbon allocation responded negatively to increased precipitation and nitrogen addition and positively to decreased precipitation and elevated CO2. The sensitivities of carbon variables to multiple global change drivers depended on the background climate and ecosystem condition, suggesting that Earth system models should be evaluated using site-specific conditions for best uses of this large dataset. Together, this synthesis underscores an urgent need to explore the interactions among multiple global change drivers in underrepresented regions such as semi-arid ecosystems, forests in the tropics and subtropics, and Arctic tundra when forecasting future terrestrial carbon-climate feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31427733     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-0958-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  48 in total

1.  Climate warming and biomass accumulation of terrestrial plants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Delu Lin; Jianyang Xia; Shiqiang Wan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Martin G De Kauwe; Tomas F Domingues; Remko A Duursma; David S Ellsworth; Daniel S Goll; David M Lapola; Kristina A Luus; A Rob MacKenzie; Belinda E Medlyn; Ryan Pavlick; Anja Rammig; Benjamin Smith; Rick Thomas; Kirsten Thonicke; Anthony P Walker; Xiaojuan Yang; Sönke Zaehle
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Global response patterns of terrestrial plant species to nitrogen addition.

Authors:  Jianyang Xia; Shiqiang Wan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Precipitation manipulation experiments--challenges and recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Claus Beier; Carl Beierkuhnlein; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Josep Penuelas; Bridget Emmett; Christian Körner; Hans de Boeck; Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen; Sebastian Leuzinger; Ivan A Janssens; Karin Hansen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Using results from global change experiments to inform land model development and calibration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Dukes; Aimée T Classen; Shiqiang Wan; J Adam Langley
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology.

Authors:  Peter S Curtis; Xianzhong Wang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Crossing the threshold: the power of multi-level experiments in identifying global change responses.

Authors:  Paul Kardol; Jonathan R De Long; Maja K Sundqvist
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  A reality check for climate change experiments: Do they reflect the real world?

Authors:  Alan K Knapp; Charles J W Carroll; Robert J Griffin-Nolan; Ingrid J Slette; Francis A Chaves; Lauren E Baur; Andrew J Felton; Jesse E Gray; Ava M Hoffman; Nathan P Lemoine; Wei Mao; Alison K Post; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming.

Authors:  L Rustad; J Campbell; G Marion; R Norby; M Mitchell; A Hartley; J Cornelissen; J Gurevitch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites.

Authors:  Martin G De Kauwe; Belinda E Medlyn; Sönke Zaehle; Anthony P Walker; Michael C Dietze; Ying-Ping Wang; Yiqi Luo; Atul K Jain; Bassil El-Masri; Thomas Hickler; David Wårlind; Ensheng Weng; William J Parton; Peter E Thornton; Shusen Wang; I Colin Prentice; Shinichi Asao; Benjamin Smith; Heather R McCarthy; Colleen M Iversen; Paul J Hanson; Jeffrey M Warren; Ram Oren; Richard J Norby
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  23 in total

1.  Temporal variability in production is not consistently affected by global change drivers across herbaceous-dominated ecosystems.

Authors:  Meghan L Avolio; Kevin R Wilcox; Kimberly J Komatsu; Nathan Lemoine; William D Bowman; Scott L Collins; Alan K Knapp; Sally E Koerner; Melinda D Smith; Sara G Baer; Katherine L Gross; Forest Isbell; Jennie McLaren; Peter B Reich; Katharine N Suding; K Blake Suttle; David Tilman; Zhuwen Xu; Qiang Yu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality.

Authors:  Yuanhe Yang; Yue Shi; Wenjuan Sun; Jinfeng Chang; Jianxiao Zhu; Leiyi Chen; Xin Wang; Yanpei Guo; Hongtu Zhang; Lingfei Yu; Shuqing Zhao; Kang Xu; Jiangling Zhu; Haihua Shen; Yuanyuan Wang; Yunfeng Peng; Xia Zhao; Xiangping Wang; Huifeng Hu; Shiping Chen; Mei Huang; Xuefa Wen; Shaopeng Wang; Biao Zhu; Shuli Niu; Zhiyao Tang; Lingli Liu; Jingyun Fang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.038

Review 3.  Dryland mechanisms could widely control ecosystem functioning in a drier and warmer world.

Authors:  José M Grünzweig; Hans J De Boeck; Ana Rey; Maria J Santos; Ori Adam; Michael Bahn; Jayne Belnap; Gaby Deckmyn; Stefan C Dekker; Omar Flores; Daniel Gliksman; David Helman; Kevin R Hultine; Lingli Liu; Ehud Meron; Yaron Michael; Efrat Sheffer; Heather L Throop; Omer Tzuk; Dan Yakir
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 19.100

4.  Net effect of environmental fluctuations in multiple global-change drivers across the tree of life.

Authors:  Marco J Cabrerizo; Emilio Marañón
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Consistent stabilizing effects of plant diversity across spatial scales and climatic gradients.

Authors:  Maowei Liang; Benjamin Baiser; Lauren M Hallett; Yann Hautier; Lin Jiang; Michel Loreau; Sydne Record; Eric R Sokol; Phoebe L Zarnetske; Shaopeng Wang
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 19.100

6.  Global environmental changes more frequently offset than intensify detrimental effects of biological invasions.

Authors:  Bianca E Lopez; Jenica M Allen; Jeffrey S Dukes; Jonathan Lenoir; Montserrat Vilà; Dana M Blumenthal; Evelyn M Beaury; Emily J Fusco; Brittany B Laginhas; Toni Lyn Morelli; Mitchell W O'Neill; Cascade J B Sorte; Alberto Maceda-Veiga; Raj Whitlock; Bethany A Bradley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Consumer regulation of the carbon cycle in coastal wetland ecosystems.

Authors:  Qiang He; Haoran Li; Changlin Xu; Qingyan Sun; Mark D Bertness; Changming Fang; Bo Li; Brian R Silliman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Warming and elevated CO2 promote rapid incorporation and degradation of plant-derived organic matter in an ombrotrophic peatland.

Authors:  Nicholas O E Ofiti; Emily F Solly; Paul J Hanson; Avni Malhotra; Guido L B Wiesenberg; Michael W I Schmidt
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 13.211

9.  Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency show seasonal responses in a multifactorial climate change experiment.

Authors:  Eva Simon; Alberto Canarini; Victoria Martin; Joana Séneca; Theresa Böckle; David Reinthaler; Erich M Pötsch; Hans-Peter Piepho; Michael Bahn; Wolfgang Wanek; Andreas Richter
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-10-16

10.  Phylogenetic conservation of soil bacterial responses to simulated global changes.

Authors:  Kazuo Isobe; Nicholas J Bouskill; Eoin L Brodie; Erika A Sudderth; Jennifer B H Martiny
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.