| Literature DB >> 31427658 |
Zhenzhong Zhang1,2,3,4, Kangning He5,6,7,8, Tan Zhang1,2,3,4, Da Tang1,2,3,4,9, Runjie Li10, Shaofeng Jia11,12.
Abstract
Recently, Goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.) has been extensively cultivated to improve the fragile ecological environment and increase the income of residents in Qinghai Province, northwestern China. However, few studies have focused on the physiological responses of Goji berry under salt stress and alkali stress. Gas exchange, photosynthetic pigments, and chlorophyll fluorescence were evaluated in response to neutral (NaCl) and alkali (NaHCO3) salt stresses. Nine irrigation treatments were applied over 30 days and included 0(Control group), 50, 100, 200, and 300 mM NaCl and NaHCO3. The results showed that salt and alkali stress reduced all the indicators and that alkali stress was more harmful to Goji berry than salt stress under the same solution concentrations. The salt tolerance and alkali resistance thresholds were identified when the index value exceeded the 50% standard of the control group, and threshold values of 246.3 ± 2.9 mM and 108.4.7 ± 2.1 mM, respectively, were determined by regression analysis. These results were used to identify the optimal water content for Goji berry. The minimum soil water content to cultivate Goji berry should be 16.22% and 23.37% under mild and moderate salt stress soils, respectively, and 29.10% and 42.68% under mild and moderate alkali stress soil, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31427658 PMCID: PMC6700091 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48514-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effects of NaCl and NaHCO3 concentrations on the (A) net photosynthetic rate (PN), (B) transpiration rate (E), (C) stomatal conductance (gs), (D) intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and (E) water use efficiency (WUE) in the leaves of Goji berry. Values are represented as the mean ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 by the least significant difference (LSD) test.
Figure 2Effects of salt stress (SS) and alkali stress (AS) on the contents of (A) chlorophyll a, (B) chlorophyll b, (C) carotenoids and (D) chlorophyll (a + b). Means values indicated by different letters in the same curve are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the least significant difference (LSD) test.
Figure 3Effects of (A) NaCl and (B) NaHCO3 on the Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo values of Goji berry after 20 days of treatment with different concentrations. Values are represented as the mean ± SE (n = 5). Abbreviations: Fv/Fm: maximum quantum yield of electron transfer of PSII, Fv/Fo: activity of the water-splitting complex.
Figure 4Effects of (A) salt stress and (B) alkali stress on the parameters associated with the chlorophyll fluorescence of Goji berry after 20 days of treatment with different salt solutions. Values are represented as the mean ± SE (n = 5).
Figure 5Effects of NaCl and NaHCO3 concentrations on (A) malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, (B) catalase (CAT) activity, (C) superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and (D) peroxidase (POD) activity in the leaves of Goji berry. Values are represented as the mean ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 by the least significant difference (LSD) test.
Coefficients of correlation (r2) among concentration, photosynthetic traits and antioxidant attributes of Lycium barbarum grown under various NaCl and NaHCO3 concentrations. Abbreviations: Chl: chlorophyll, PN: net photosynthetic rate, gS: stomatal conductance, E: transpiration rate, Ci: intercellular CO2 concentration, MDA: malondialdehyde, SOD: superoxide dismutase, POD: peroxidase, CAT: catalase. **Significant correlation (P < 0.01, n = 20).
| Concentration | Chl | PN | gS | Ci | E | MDA | SOD | POD | CAT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration | 1 | |||||||||
| Chl | −0.95** | 1 | ||||||||
| PN | −0.93** | −0.93** | 1 | |||||||
| gS | −0.84** | −0.81 | −0.94** | 1 | ||||||
| Ci | 0.86** | 0.81 | 0.91** | 0.49 | 1 | |||||
| E | −0.89** | −0.85 | −0.90 | −0.94** | 0.61 | 1 | ||||
| MDA | 0.96** | −0.90** | −0.95** | −0.95** | 0.61 | −0.96** | 1 | |||
| SOD | 0.78** | −0.90** | −0.95** | −0.93** | 0.66 | −0.90** | −0.78** | 1 | ||
| POD | 0.46 | −0.83** | −0.84** | −0.89** | 0.6 | −0.97** | −0.41 | −0.86** | 1 | |
| CAT | 0.66 | 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.50 | −0.78 | 0.59 | −0.63 | −0.93** | −0.90** | 1 |
Regression function of photosynthetic parameters, antioxidant system indices, and saline-alkali stress. Abbreviations: SOD: superoxide dismutase.
| Treatment | Index | Regression function | R2 | Thresholds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt stress | Net photosynthetic rate | y = −2e-05x2 −0.03x +15.695 | R² = 0.91 | 246.3 ± 2.9 |
| SOD | y = −0.0002x2 +0.307x +124.52 | R² = 0.89 | 254.3 ± 2.4 | |
| Alkali stress | Net photosynthetic rate | y = −8e-05x2 −0.1029x +50.726 | R² = 0.94 | 183.4 ± 3.4 |
| SOD | y = −0.0022x2 +0.7524x +124.1 | R² = 0.90 | 108.4 ± 2.1 |
Figure 6Linear regression curve of the soil salt content, and soil water content. *Means a significant difference at P < 0.05 (n = 5).