Literature DB >> 31427171

First-Line Treatment for Endocrine-Sensitive Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Angela Toss1, Marta Venturelli2, Isabella Sperduti3, Eleonora Molinaro2, Chrystel Isca2, Elena Barbieri2, Federico Piacentini2, Claudia Omarini2, Laura Cortesi2, Stefano Cascinu2, Luca Moscetti2.   

Abstract

In the last decade, several clinical trials have investigated novel endocrine combinations for the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, the use of combinations for the first-line treatment of bone-only disease is widely discussed as a result of its indolent natural history. We performed a comprehensive search of phase 3 randomized clinical trials published in the literature through September 2018. Our aim was to explore the role of the new endocrine approaches in bone-only metastatic breast cancer, suggesting a possible strategy for their selection. In particular, we evaluated the comparative risk of adverse event occurrence during these treatments. A total of 6 studies were deemed suitable for meta-analysis: the Monaleesa-2, Monaleesa-7, Monarch-3, Paloma-2, SWOG, and Alliance trials. Overall, the novel strategies were shown to improve progression-free survival in bone-only disease (hazard ratio = 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.86; P = .003). Combinations with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.75; P < .001) with an acceptable toxicity profile. Abemaciclib was associated with increased anemia and gastrointestinal toxicity (especially diarrhea), whereas palbociclib was associated with increased leukopenia (but not neutropenia) compared to the other compounds. Increased aspartate aminotransferase levels were reported for both ribociclib and abemaciclib. The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy represents an effective and well-tolerated approach for first-line treatment in bone-only disease settings. Because no direct comparison between the 3 cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is available, the selection of the most appropriate treatment should be based on toxicity profile as well as patient preference and copathologies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bevacizumab; Bone-only disease; CDK4/6 inhibitors; Endocrine therapy; Fulvestrant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31427171     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Overall Survival of CDK4/6-Inhibitor-Based Treatments in Clinically Relevant Subgroups of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Schettini; Fabiola Giudici; Mario Giuliano; Massimo Cristofanilli; Grazia Arpino; Lucia Del Mastro; Fabio Puglisi; Sabino De Placido; Ida Paris; Pietro De Placido; Sergio Venturini; Michelino De Laurentis; PierFranco Conte; Dejan Juric; Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Lajos Pusztai; Aleix Prat; Guy Jerusalem; Angelo Di Leo; Daniele Generali
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Has Worse Outcome Compared with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in Stage IV Breast Cancer with Bone-Only Metastasis.

Authors:  Yunbo Luo; Aimin Ma; Shengkai Huang; Yinghua Yu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.268

3.  Combined endocrine approaches vs endocrine therapy alone as first line treatment in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2 negative, advanced breast cancer: to prescribe for the patient or the physician? A meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Claudia Omarini; Federico Piacentini; Isabella Sperduti; Monica Barbolini; Chrystel Isca; Angela Toss; Laura Cortesi; Elena Barbieri; Massimo Dominici; Luca Moscetti
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Modeling the Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Enumeration in Metastatic Breast Cancer for Clinical Trial Design Simulation.

Authors:  Lorenzo Gerratana; Jean-Yves Pierga; James M Reuben; Andrew A Davis; Firas H Wehbe; Luc Dirix; Tanja Fehm; Franco Nolé; Rafael Gisbert-Criado; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Salvatore Grisanti; Jose A Garcia-Saenz; Justin Stebbing; Carlos Caldas; Paola Gazzaniga; Luis Manso; Rita Zamarchi; Marta Bonotto; Angela Fernandez de Lascoiti; Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Michail Ignatiadis; Maria-Teresa Sandri; Daniele Generali; Carmine De Angelis; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Wolfgang Janni; Vicente Carañana; Sabine Riethdorf; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Fabio Puglisi; Mario Giuliano; Klaus Pantel; François-Clément Bidard; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Real-life prognosis of 5041 bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients in the multicenter national observational ESME program.

Authors:  Marion Bertho; Julien Fraisse; Anne Patsouris; Paul Cottu; Monica Arnedos; David Pérol; Anne Jaffré; Anthony Goncalves; Marie-Paule Lebitasy; Véronique D'Hondt; Florence Dalenc; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Christelle Levy; Sandrine Dabakuyo; Roman Rouzier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Lionel Uwer; Jean-Christophe Eymard; Mathias Breton; Michaël Chevrot; Sébastien Thureau; Thierry Petit; Gaëtane Simon; Jean-Sébastien Frénel
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 8.168

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.