| Literature DB >> 31426389 |
Lingling Zheng1, Junlian Tan1, Rongjiao Liu1, Xueru Yang1, Huiling He1, Huiming Xiao2, Liwen He3.
Abstract
Post-traumatic endophthalmitis (PTE) is considered as one of the most serious complications after open globe injuries (OGIs), especially in children. Poor prognosis of this disease can lead to a variety of socioeconomic problems. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of pediatric OGIs and the factors associated with the development of PTE in China. 131 patients under 14 years old and needed hospitalization for management of OGIs were enrolled. There were 90 males and 41 females. 44 patients were left-behind children, the majority were 3-6 years old (n = 71, 71/131, 54.2%) and living in rural area (n = 106, 106/131, 80.9%). After injury, 82 patients received primary repair within 24 h, with the remaining 49 patients receiving primary repair after 24 h. Eventually, there were 28 (28/131, 21.4%) patients presented with PTE. In those 49 patients, the frequency of PTE achieving 32.7% (16/49). Univariate analysis showed that the timing of primary repair is significantly associated with the development of PTE (p < 0.05). Moreover, left-behind children took higher risks in having delayed treatment that over 24 h after OGIs (OR = 2.466, 95% CI: 1.16-5.26). Reducing the time before primary repair is a useful strategy to prevent the development of PTE. Special supervision is needed for pre-school-aged boys living in rural areas, especially for left-behind children.Entities:
Keywords: left-behind children; pediatric open ocular injury; post-traumatic endophthalmitis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31426389 PMCID: PMC6719907 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Clinical features of pediatric open globe injuries patients (n = 131).
| Variable |
| PTE ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With | Without | ||||
| Gender | 1.000 | ||||
| Male | 90 (68.7%) | 19 (67.9%) | 71 (68.9%) | ||
| Female | 41 (31.3%) | 9 (32.1%) | 32 (31.1%) | ||
| Age (years) | 5.51 ± 2.99 | 0.520 | |||
| 1–2 | 18 (13.7%) | 4 (14.3%) | 14 (13.6%) | ||
| 3–6 | 71 (54.2%) | 16 (57.1%) | 55 (53.4%) | ||
| 7–10 | 34 (26.0%) | 8 (28.6%) | 26 (25.2%) | ||
| 11–13 | 8 (6.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (7.8%) | ||
| Left-behind children | 0.242 | ||||
| Yes | 44 (33.6%) | 12 (42.9%) | 32 (31.1%) | ||
| No | 87 (66.4%) | 16 (57.1%) | 71 (68.9%) | ||
| Location of residence | 0.141 | ||||
| Urban | 25 (19.1%) | 3 (10.7%) | 22 (21.4%) | ||
| Rural | 106 (80.9%) | 25 (89.3%) | 81 (78.6%) | ||
| Location when injured | 0.625 | ||||
| Home | 77 (58.8%) | 17 (60.7%) | 60 (58.3%) | ||
| Outdoors | 33 (25.2%) | 7 (25.0%) | 26 (25.2%) | ||
| School | 15 (11.4%) | 4 (14.3%) | 11 (10.7%) | ||
| Undetermined | 6 (4.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (5.8%) | ||
| Causative objects | 0.886 | ||||
| Sharp objects | 78 (59.5%) | 16 (57.1%) | 62 (60.2%) | ||
| Blunt objects | 14 (10.7%) | 4 (14.3%) | 10 (9.7%) | ||
| Plant | 16 (12.2%) | 4 (14.3%) | 12 (11.7%) | ||
| Firework | 4 (3.1%) | 1 (3.6%) | 3 (2.9%) | ||
| Animals | 4 (3.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (3.9%) | ||
| Undetermined | 15 (11.4%) | 3 (10.7%) | 12 (11.6%) | ||
| Timing of primary repair | 0.014 | ||||
| ≤24 h | 82 (63.4%) | 12 (42.9%) | 70 (68.0%) | ||
| >24 h | 49 (36.6%) | 16 (57.1%) | 33 (22.0%) | ||
| Injury type | 0.650 | ||||
| Penetrating | 105 (80.1%) | 25 (89.3%) | 80 (77.6%) | ||
| Rupture | 17 (13.0%) | 2 (7.1%) | 15 (14.6%) | ||
| Perforating | 4 (3.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (3.9%) | ||
| Intraocular foreign body | 5 (3.8%) | 1 (3.6%) | 4 (3.9%) | ||
| Visual acuity | 0.782 | ||||
| >20/40 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) | ||
| 20/200–20/50 | 6 (4.6%) | 1 (3.6%) | 5 (4.9%) | ||
| 1/200–19/200 | 7 (5.3%) | 1 (3.6%) | 6 (5.8%) | ||
| Light perception–Finger count | 66 (50.3%) | 12 (42.8%) | 54 (52.4%) | ||
| No light perception | 1 (0.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.0%) | ||
| Undetermined | 50 (38.2%) | 14 (50.0%) | 36 (34.9%) | ||
* Chi-square test for categorical variables. Fisher’s exact test was used when necessary. PTE = Post-traumatic endophthalmitis.
Logistic regression analysis of post-traumatic endophthalmitis.
| Variable | PTE | β | SE 1 | OR (95% CI) 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With | Without | |||||
| Timing of primary repair | 0.017 | |||||
| ≤24 h | 12 | 70 | 1 (Ref.) 3 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | |
| >24 h | 16 | 33 | 1.040 | 0.436 | 2.828(1.202–6.652) | |
1 SE = Standard Error. 2 OR (95% CI) = Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval). 3 Ref. = Reference.
Logistic regression analysis of the timing of primary repair.
| Variable | Timing of Primary Repair | β | SE 1 | OR (95% CI) 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤24 h | >24 h | |||||
| Left-behind | ||||||
| Yes | 21 | 23 | 1 (Ref.) 3 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 0.019 * |
| No | 61 | 26 | 0.903 | 0.386 | 2.466(1.157–5.258) | |
| Gender | 0.797 | |||||
| Male | 56 | 34 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | |
| Female | 26 | 15 | −0.100 | 0.403 | 0.905(0.411–1.993) | |
| Age(years) | 0.962 | |||||
| 1–6 | 55 | 34 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | |
| 7–14 | 27 | 15 | −0.019 | 0.402 | 0.981(0.446–2.157) | |
| Location of residence | 0.182 | |||||
| Urban | 19 | 6 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | |
| Rural | 63 | 43 | 0.694 | 0.519 | 2.001(0.723–5.538) | |
1 SE = Standard Error. 2 OR (95% CI) = Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval). 3 Ref. = Reference. * p < 0.05.