| Literature DB >> 31426333 |
Grażyna Cacak-Pietrzak1, Renata Różyło2, Dariusz Dziki3, Urszula Gawlik-Dziki4, Alicja Sułek5, Beata Biernacka3.
Abstract
Cistus incanus L. (CI) has been proposed as an innovative functional supplement of food products, and hence the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of the addition of dried CI on the properties of bread. Bread was prepared from white wheat flour supplemented with the addition of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% of ground CI. After the completion of baking process, various characteristics of the obtained bread product, such as yield, volume, porosity, acidity, color, and texture, were evaluated. In addition, total phenolic content (TPC), ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical scavenging activity, chelating power (CHEL), and ability to quench OH∙ radicals were measured. The results showed that the addition of CI to bread caused a reduction in the volume of bread, but texture of the crumbs was acceptable. Acidity and moisture content of bread were found to be increased following CI enrichment. Significant changes in the ash content and the color of bread crumbs were also observed. Bread incorporated with CI was characterized by significantly higher TPC and much higher antioxidant activity, as measured by ABTS, CHEL, and OH∙ radicals, compared to control bread. Supplementation of bread with 3% CI produced a product with desirable characteristics which was also favored by consumers.Entities:
Keywords: Cistus incanus; antioxidants; baking; bread; physical properties; wheat
Year: 2019 PMID: 31426333 PMCID: PMC6723803 DOI: 10.3390/foods8080349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Appearance of wheat bread with different amount of Cistus incanus L (CI).
Figure 2Baking properties of bread enriched with Cistus incanus L. additives. (a) yield of bread, (b) baking loss, (c) volume of bread, (d)porosity of bread, (e) acidity of bread, (f) moisture of bread,.
Ash content and color parameters of Cistus incanus L. (CI) and bread samples supplemented with this additive.
| Sample | Ash Content (%) | L* | a* | b* | ΔE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI herbs | 5.01 c ± 0.211 | 54.93 e ± 0.75 | 0.68 b ± 0.03 | 20.04 d ± 0.44 | - | |
| Proportion of CI added | 0% | 0.82 a ± 0.018 | 82.44 a ± 0.176 | 0.09 a ± 0.003 | 10.35 a ± 0.062 | - |
| 1% | 0.90 b ± 0.037 | 75.71 b ± 0.217 | 2.39 c ± 0.038 | 10.65 a ± 0.094 | 7.20 | |
| 2% | 1.00 b ± 0.041 | 72.89 c ± 0.267 | 2.38 c ± 0.065 | 12.67 b ± 0.206 | 9.99 | |
| 3% | 1.01 b ± 0.086 | 72.64 c ± 0.356 | 2.39 c ± 0.037 | 12.69 b ± 0.235 | 10.12 | |
| 4% | 1.06 b ± 0.027 | 70.90 d ± 0.206 | 2.91 d ± 0.063 | 14.45 c ± 0.184 | 12.21 | |
| 5% | 1.10 b ± 0.064 | 69.98 d ± 0.330 | 2.88 d ± 0.065 | 14.59 c ± 0.227 | 13.09 | |
Note: Means with different letter in the same column are significantly different (α = 0.05).
Texture parameters of bread samples enriched with Cistus incanus L. (CI).
| Sample | Hardness (N) | Springiness (-) | Cohesiveness (-) | Chewiness (N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of CI added | 0% | 12.9 a ± 0.59 | 0.91 a ± 0.031 | 0.61 a ± 0.041 | 7.2 ab ± 0.53 |
| 1% | 12.7 a ± 0.78 | 0.88 ab ± 0.037 | 0.57 a ± 0.038 | 6.4 b ± 0.41 | |
| 2% | 12.8 a ± 0.68 | 0.89 a ± 0.028 | 0.56 a ± 0.031 | 6.5 b ± 0.36 | |
| 3% | 12.9 a ± 0.94 | 0.88 ab ± 0.045 | 0.55 a ± 0.018 | 6.6 ab ± 0.40 | |
| 4% | 13.7 ab ± 0.63 | 0.86 b ± 0.019 | 0.56 a ± 0.011 | 6.7 ab ± 0.35 | |
| 5% | 14.3 b ± 0.46 | 0.89 a ± 0.026 | 0.57 a ± 0.026 | 7.4 a ± 0.41 | |
Note: Means with different letter in the same column are significantly different (α = 0.05).
Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of bread supplemented with Cistus incanus L. (CI).
| Sample | (mg GAE∙g d.w.−1) | EC50 (mg d.w.∙mL−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC | ABTS | CHEL | OH∙ | ||
| Amount of CI added | 0% | 4.8 a ± 0.06 | 156.9 a ± 9.83 | 65.3 a ± 0.36 | 39.9 a ± 2.11 |
| 1% | 5.6 b ± 0.06 | 77.5 b ± 0.92 | 43.8 b ± 2.35 | 35.0 b ± 1.10 | |
| 2% | 6.7 c ± 0.10 | 48.6 cd ± 1.25 | 40.7 bc ± 0.58 | 26.9 c ± 1.21 | |
| 3% | 7.9 d ± 0.25 | 38.3 de ± 1.55 | 38.1 cd ± 0.32 | 25.7 c ± 0.83 | |
| 4% | 8.3 e ± 0.12 | 33.1 e ± 1.15 | 36.7 d ± 0.56 | 24.8 cd ± 0.95 | |
| 5% | 10.1 f ± 0.06 | 24.8 e ± 0.70 | 33.9 e ± 0.83 | 22.5 d ± 0.89 | |
Notes: TPC—total phenolic content; ABTS—ability to quench ABTS radicals; CHEL—chelating power; OH—ability to quench OH∙ radicals. Values in the same column not sharing same letters are significantly different (α = 0.05).
Sensory analysis of wheat bread enriched with Cistus incanus L. (CI).
| Amount of CI Added | Sensory Attributes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Taste | Aroma | Texture | Overall Acceptability | |
| 0% | 6.3 a ± 0.62 | 6.7 a ± 0.76 | 6.8a ± 0.93 | 7.0 a ± 0.87 | 6.7 a ± 0.84 |
| 1% | 6.4 a ± 0.87 | 6.6 a ± 0.79 | 6.9a ± 0.85 | 6.6 ab ± 0.73 | 6.5 a ± 0.73 |
| 2% | 6.7 a ± 0.91 | 6.1ab ± 0.59 | 6.5 ab ± 0.74 | 6.4 ab ± 0.81 | 6.5 a ± 0.82 |
| 3% | 6.8 a ± 0.83 | 5.6 ab ± 0.63 | 5.8 ab ± 0.62 | 6.3 ab ± 0.75 | 6.4 a ± 0.81 |
| 4% | 6.0 a ± 0.59 | 5.1 b ± 0.71 | 5.3 b ± 0.63 | 6.0 ab ± 0.79 | 5.2 b ± 0.37 |
| 5% | 5.5 a ± 0.64 | 5.0 b ± 0.65 | 5.2 b ± 0.59 | 4.9 b ± 0.56 | 5.1 b ± 0.44 |
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (α = 0.05).