Literature DB >> 31425985

How does environmental regulation affect haze pollution governance?-An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data.

Ming Zhang1, Xiaoxiao Liu2, Yueting Ding3, Wenwen Wang4.   

Abstract

Recently, haze pollution is the most serious air problem in China. In the process of haze pollution governance, environmental regulation not only has a direct impact on haze pollution but may also affects haze pollution indirectly through four transmission channels, which are coal consumption, foreign direct investment (FDI), industrial structure and technological innovation. The purpose of this paper is to clarify how environmental regulation affects haze pollution governance through both direct and indirect impacts. Based on the difference Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), this paper explores the direct and indirect impact of environmental regulation on haze pollution governance over the period 2006-2016. The results show that China's current environmental regulation had effectively inhibited the haze pollution and achieved the expected effects. For coal consumption, it significantly aggravated haze pollution, but the ER implemented or not. However, environmental regulation provided a force mechanism to promote transformation and upgrading of industrial structure, thus to reverse the impact direction of industrial structure on haze pollution and mitigated the haze pollution. Moreover, the results indicate that FDI in China turned out to have a "pollution halo" effect and reduced the degree of haze pollution, while technological innovation had the "compliance cost" effect and increased the degree of haze pollution. Additionally, we find that automobile exhaust emissions and economic development were also important reasons for the increase of haze. According to the results, some policy implications were provided for the future haze pollution governance.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Direct effect; Effectiveness; Environmental regulation; Haze pollution; Indirect effect

Year:  2019        PMID: 31425985     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Threshold Effect in the Relationship between Environmental Regulations and Haze Pollution: Empirical Evidence from PSTR Estimation.

Authors:  Yonglian Chang; Yingjun Huang; Manman Li; Zhengmin Duan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Retrospect and Outlook of Research on Regional Haze Pollution in China: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Li Li; Peng Deng; Jun Wang; Zixuan Wang; Junwei Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Promoting Regional Economic Transformation Forecast Based on Intelligent Computing Technology.

Authors:  Hongbiao Cai
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  The effects of the environmental protection tax law on heavily polluting firms in China.

Authors:  Huwei Wen; Weifeng Deng; Quanen Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  How Does Environmental Information Disclosure Affect Pollution Emissions: Firm-Level Evidence from China.

Authors:  Xiangyang Yang; Zheng Zhang; Siqi Rao; Bei Liu; Yueyue Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  How Does Digitalization Affect Haze Pollution? The Mediating Role of Energy Consumption.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yubing Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.