Literature DB >> 31425453

Low-pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Probal Neogi1, Pankaj Kumar2, Shritosh Kumar2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: To compare the changes in hepatic enzymes and comfort level of the surgeon in low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LPPLC, 7 mm Hg) with that of normal pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (NPPLC, 14 mm Hg).
METHODS: Eighty-two patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (LPPLC and NPPLC). Serum levels of bilirubin, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and lactate dehydrogenase were measured before the operation, at the time of reversal from anesthesia, 24 hours after the operation, and on day 7. Serious adverse events, intra-operative complications, surgeon's comfort level of dissection, operative time, conversion rates to an open procedure, or normal pressure pneumoperitoneum were recorded.
RESULTS: Of the 41 patients randomized for LPPLC, 8 patients were converted to NPPLC due to difficulty in dissection and 1 converted to open in each group. There was statistically significant fall in mean serum bilirubin level in both the groups in the immediate postoperative period (P<0.05). Statistically significant increase in its level was observed after 24 hours in the NPPLC group only (P<0.05). Levels of mean serum serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase increased significantly (P<0.05) in immediate postoperative period and a further increase was observed after 24 hours (P<0.05) in the NPPLC group only. The comfort level of surgeon was found to be significantly better in the NPPLC group.
CONCLUSIONS: LPPLC is a safe procedure, especially in the hands of an experienced surgeon with clinically insignificant systemic effects. But the comfort level of surgeon is better in normal pressure when compared with low pressure. In patients with deranged hepatic functions undergoing advanced laparoscopic procedures, it is advisable to start the surgery with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Pressure may be escalated further as per the surgeon's comfort.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31425453     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  4 in total

1.  Comparing postoperative pain in various pressure pneumoperitoneum of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Wonbin Chang; Tae Yoo; Won Tae Cho; Giyuon Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 2.  Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Monica Ortenzi; Giulia Montori; Alberto Sartori; Andrea Balla; Emanuele Botteri; Giacomo Piatto; Gaetano Gallo; Silvia Vigna; Mario Guerrieri; Sophie Williams; Mauro Podda; Ferdinando Agresta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  What Is the Appropriate Use of Laparoscopy over Open Procedures in the Current COVID-19 Climate?

Authors:  Yalini Vigneswaran; Vivek N Prachand; Mitchell C Posner; Jeffrey B Matthews; Mustafa Hussain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  The "Dark Side" of Pneumoperitoneum and Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Giuseppina Rosaria Umano; Giulia Delehaye; Carmine Noviello; Alfonso Papparella
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-05-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.