Rebecca L Morris1, Tristan D J Graham1, Jaya Kelvin2, Marco Ghisalberti3, Stephen E Swearer1. 1. National Centre for Coasts and Climate, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, VIC, Australia. 3. Oceans Graduate School, The University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coastal protection from erosion and flooding is a significant ecosystem service provided by vegetated marine systems. Kelp beds are a dominant habitat-forming species on temperate reefs worldwide. While they are valued as hotspots of biodiversity, there is a paucity of information that supports their use in nature-based coastal defence. This includes the effectiveness of kelp beds in attenuating waves approaching the shore and how this influences sediment transport. METHODS: Wave loggers were deployed at paired kelp bed and control (urchin barren) treatments at four sites in Port Phillip Bay, Australia. The significant wave height offshore (exposed side) to onshore (sheltered side) of the treatment were compared to determine wave attenuation. KEY RESULTS: At three sites, the wave attenuation of kelp beds was significantly less than that of the control. This result was consistent across the environmental conditions recorded in this study. At the fourth site, on average there was no significant difference in wave transmission between kelp and control. However, wave attenuation at kelp beds was 10 % greater than the control during periods of northerly winds. We highlight the importance of disentangling the effects of the reef substratum and kelp when evaluating the efficacy of kelp at providing coastal protection. CONCLUSIONS: We have highlighted a significant gap in the research on ecosystem services provided by kelp beds. A greater understanding is needed on which kelp species are able to provide coastal protection, and under what conditions. Such future research is essential for providing managers and policy makers with actionable information on sustainable and cost-effective solutions for coastal defence when faced with a changing climate.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coastal protection from erosion and flooding is a significant ecosystem service provided by vegetated marine systems. Kelp beds are a dominant habitat-forming species on temperate reefs worldwide. While they are valued as hotspots of biodiversity, there is a paucity of information that supports their use in nature-based coastal defence. This includes the effectiveness of kelp beds in attenuating waves approaching the shore and how this influences sediment transport. METHODS: Wave loggers were deployed at paired kelp bed and control (urchin barren) treatments at four sites in Port Phillip Bay, Australia. The significant wave height offshore (exposed side) to onshore (sheltered side) of the treatment were compared to determine wave attenuation. KEY RESULTS: At three sites, the wave attenuation of kelp beds was significantly less than that of the control. This result was consistent across the environmental conditions recorded in this study. At the fourth site, on average there was no significant difference in wave transmission between kelp and control. However, wave attenuation at kelp beds was 10 % greater than the control during periods of northerly winds. We highlight the importance of disentangling the effects of the reef substratum and kelp when evaluating the efficacy of kelp at providing coastal protection. CONCLUSIONS: We have highlighted a significant gap in the research on ecosystem services provided by kelp beds. A greater understanding is needed on which kelp species are able to provide coastal protection, and under what conditions. Such future research is essential for providing managers and policy makers with actionable information on sustainable and cost-effective solutions for coastal defence when faced with a changing climate.
Authors: Stijn Temmerman; Patrick Meire; Tjeerd J Bouma; Peter M J Herman; Tom Ysebaert; Huib J De Vriend Journal: Nature Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kira A Krumhansl; Daniel K Okamoto; Andrew Rassweiler; Mark Novak; John J Bolton; Kyle C Cavanaugh; Sean D Connell; Craig R Johnson; Brenda Konar; Scott D Ling; Fiorenza Micheli; Kjell M Norderhaug; Alejandro Pérez-Matus; Isabel Sousa-Pinto; Daniel C Reed; Anne K Salomon; Nick T Shears; Thomas Wernberg; Robert J Anderson; Nevell S Barrett; Alejandro H Buschmann; Mark H Carr; Jennifer E Caselle; Sandrine Derrien-Courtel; Graham J Edgar; Matt Edwards; James A Estes; Claire Goodwin; Michael C Kenner; David J Kushner; Frithjof E Moy; Julia Nunn; Robert S Steneck; Julio Vásquez; Jane Watson; Jon D Witman; Jarrett E K Byrnes Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jochen Hinkel; Daniel Lincke; Athanasios T Vafeidis; Mahé Perrette; Robert James Nicholls; Richard S J Tol; Ben Marzeion; Xavier Fettweis; Cezar Ionescu; Anders Levermann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ezequiel M Marzinelli; Stefan B Williams; Russell C Babcock; Neville S Barrett; Craig R Johnson; Alan Jordan; Gary A Kendrick; Oscar R Pizarro; Dan A Smale; Peter D Steinberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Filippo Ferrario; Michael W Beck; Curt D Storlazzi; Fiorenza Micheli; Christine C Shepard; Laura Airoldi Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 14.919