Literature DB >> 31424162

Clinical assessment of the palatal alveolar bone thickness and its correlation with the buccolingual angulation of maxillary incisors for immediate implant placement.

Thanh A Do1, Yen-Wen Shen1, Lih-Jyh Fuh1, Heng-Li Huang1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians needed to be aware of the thinness of the palatal bone plate when identifying severe protrusion of maxillary incisors, as this could result in perforation of the palatal bone plate during surgical procedures associated with immediate maxillary implant placement.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the thickness of the palatal bone plate, the buccolingual angulation of maxillary incisors, and the correlation between these two parameters in relation to immediate implant placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 37 Asian patients (20-60 years old) with no evidence of dental treatment in the maxillary incisor area were collected and classified into groups based on sex and incisor locations. Sagittal slices were used to measure the palatal bone plate thickness at the cervical, middle, and apical levels, and the buccolingual angulation of each tooth was also measured. The intraclass correlation, Shapiro-Wilk test, descriptive analysis, Student's t-test, and Pearson correlation were used for statistical and correlation analyses, with P < .05 applied as the criterion for statistical significance.
RESULTS: At the apical level of all inspected teeth and the middle level of lateral incisors, the palatal bone was significantly thicker in males than in females. The inclination of the maxillary lateral incisor showed a moderate negative linear correlation with the palatal bone thickness at the apical level (R = -0.517 and R = -0.579 for males and females, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In an Asian population, an increased buccolingual angulation of the maxillary lateral incisors was correlated with a thinner palatal bone plate at the apical level.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pearson correlation; buccolingual angulation; cone-beam computed tomography; immediate implant placement; palatal bone thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31424162     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  5 in total

1.  Morphologic analysis of alveolar bone in maxillary and mandibular incisors on sagittal views.

Authors:  Li-Qi Zhang; Ya-Ning Zhao; Ya-Qiong Zhang; Yu Zhang; Deng-Gao Liu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Associations among the anterior maxillary dental arch form, alveolar bone thickness, and the sagittal root position of the maxillary central incisors in relation to immediate implant placement: A cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Suttikiat Somvasoontra; Wichit Tharanon; Pravej Serichetaphongse; Atiphan Pimkhaokham
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Relationship between different skeletal facial types and anterior alveolar bone thickness with cone-beam computed tomography in an Asian population.

Authors:  Baochao Li; Jialing Li; Huijuan Wang; Xiaoqiu Xie; Juan Wen; Huang Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

4.  Comparison of alveolar bone width and sagittal tooth angulation of maxillary central incisors in Class I and Class III canine relationships: a retrospective study using CBCT.

Authors:  Chen Lei; Qun Yu; Di Wu; Kunzhan Cai; Paul Weigl; Chunbo Tang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 5.  Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior and Posterior Teeth-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Diana Heimes; Eik Schiegnitz; Robert Kuchen; Peer W Kämmerer; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.