Juyoen Hur1, Kathryn A DeYoung1,2, Samiha Islam1, Allegra S Anderson3, Matthew G Barstead1,4, Alexander J Shackman1,5,6. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD20742, USA. 2. Department of Family Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD20742, USA. 3. Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN37240, USA. 4. Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD20742, USA. 5. Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD20742, USA. 6. Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD20742, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social anxiety lies on a continuum, and young adults with elevated symptoms are at risk for developing a range of psychiatric disorders. Yet relatively little is known about the factors that govern the hour-by-hour experience and expression of social anxiety in the real world. METHODS: Here we used smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to intensively sample emotional experience across different social contexts in the daily lives of 228 young adults selectively recruited to represent a broad spectrum of social anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: Leveraging data from over 11 000 real-world assessments, our results highlight the central role of close friends, family members, and romantic partners. The presence of such close companions was associated with enhanced mood, yet socially anxious individuals had fewer confidants and spent less time with the close companions that they do have. Although higher levels of social anxiety were associated with a general worsening of mood, socially anxious individuals appear to derive larger benefits - lower levels of negative affect, anxiety, and depression - from their close companions. In contrast, variation in social anxiety was unrelated to the amount of time spent with strangers, co-workers, and acquaintances; and we uncovered no evidence of emotional hypersensitivity to these less-familiar individuals. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a framework for understanding the deleterious consequences of social anxiety in emerging adulthood and set the stage for developing improved intervention strategies.
BACKGROUND:Social anxiety lies on a continuum, and young adults with elevated symptoms are at risk for developing a range of psychiatric disorders. Yet relatively little is known about the factors that govern the hour-by-hour experience and expression of social anxiety in the real world. METHODS: Here we used smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to intensively sample emotional experience across different social contexts in the daily lives of 228 young adults selectively recruited to represent a broad spectrum of social anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: Leveraging data from over 11 000 real-world assessments, our results highlight the central role of close friends, family members, and romantic partners. The presence of such close companions was associated with enhanced mood, yet socially anxious individuals had fewer confidants and spent less time with the close companions that they do have. Although higher levels of social anxiety were associated with a general worsening of mood, socially anxious individuals appear to derive larger benefits - lower levels of negative affect, anxiety, and depression - from their close companions. In contrast, variation in social anxiety was unrelated to the amount of time spent with strangers, co-workers, and acquaintances; and we uncovered no evidence of emotional hypersensitivity to these less-familiar individuals. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a framework for understanding the deleterious consequences of social anxiety in emerging adulthood and set the stage for developing improved intervention strategies.
Authors: David Watson; Michael W O'Hara; Kristin Naragon-Gainey; Erin Koffel; Michael Chmielewski; Roman Kotov; Sara M Stasik; Camilo J Ruggero Journal: Assessment Date: 2012-07-20
Authors: Todd B Kashdan; Antonina S Farmer; Leah M Adams; Patty Ferssizidis; Patrick E McKnight; John B Nezlek Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2013-07-01
Authors: Neeltje M Batelaan; Renske C Bosman; Anna Muntingh; Willemijn D Scholten; Klaas M Huijbregts; Anton J L M van Balkom Journal: BMJ Date: 2017-09-13
Authors: Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent; Lorenz Berg; Manfred E Beutel; Andreas Hinz; Markus Zenger; Martin Härter; Urs Nater; Elmar Brähler Journal: BMC Psychol Date: 2018-07-17
Authors: Juyoen Hur; Manuel Kuhn; Shannon E Grogans; Allegra S Anderson; Samiha Islam; Hyung Cho Kim; Rachael M Tillman; Andrew S Fox; Jason F Smith; Kathryn A DeYoung; Alexander J Shackman Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Juyoen Hur; Jason F Smith; Kathryn A DeYoung; Allegra S Anderson; Jinyi Kuang; Hyung Cho Kim; Rachael M Tillman; Manuel Kuhn; Andrew S Fox; Alexander J Shackman Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Caroline J Charpentier; Paul Faulkner; Eva R Pool; Verena Ly; Marieke S Tollenaar; Lisa M Kluen; Aniek Fransen; Yumeya Yamamori; Níall Lally; Anahit Mkrtchian; Vincent Valton; Quentin J M Huys; Ioannis Sarigiannidis; Kelly A Morrow; Valentina Krenz; Felix Kalbe; Anna Cremer; Gundula Zerbes; Franziska M Kausche; Nadine Wanke; Alessio Giarrizzo; Erdem Pulcu; Susannah Murphy; Alexander Kaltenboeck; Michael Browning; Lynn K Paul; Roshan Cools; Karin Roelofs; Luiz Pessoa; Catherine J Harmer; Henry W Chase; Christian Grillon; Lars Schwabe; Jonathan P Roiser; Oliver J Robinson; John P O'Doherty Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 3.436