Literature DB >> 31423624

Should Pearson's correlation coefficient be avoided?

Richard A Armstrong1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To survey the use of Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and related statistical methods in the ophthalmic literature, to consider the limitations of r, and to suggest suitable alternative methods of analysis. RECENT
FINDINGS: Searching Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (OPO), Optometry and Vision Science (OVS), and Clinical and Experimental Optometry (CXO) online archives using correlation and Pearson's r as search terms resulted in 4057 and 281 hits respectively. Coefficient of determination, r square, or r squared received fewer hits (65, 8, and 22 hits respectively). The assumption that r follows a bivariate normal distribution was rarely encountered (3 hits) although several studies applied Spearman's rank correlation (70 hits). The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was widely used (178 hits), but fewer hits were recorded for partial correlation (43 hits) and multiple correlation (13) hits. There was little evidence that the problem of sample size was addressed in correlation studies.
SUMMARY: Investigators should be alert to whether: (1) the relationship between two variables could be non-linear, (2) the data are bivariate normal, (3) r accounts for a significant proportion of the variance in Y, (4) outliers are present, the data are clustered, or have a restricted range, (5) the sample size is appropriate, and (6) a significant correlation indicates causality. In addition, the number of significant digits used to express r and the problems of multiple testing should be addressed. The problems and limitations of r suggest a more cautious approach regarding its use and the application of alternative methods where appropriate.
© 2019 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2019 The College of Optometrists.

Keywords:  Pearson's correlation coefficient (r); bivariate normal distribution; correlation; curvilinear regression; partial correlation; range restriction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31423624     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  5 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence-based automatic assessment of lower limb torsion on MRI.

Authors:  Justus Schock; Daniel Truhn; Darius Nürnberger; Stefan Conrad; Marc Sebastian Huppertz; Sebastian Keil; Christiane Kuhl; Dorit Merhof; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Reply to Kudus, A.L. Comment on "Brandl et al. Immediate Effects of Myofascial Release on the Thoracolumbar Fascia and Osteopathic Treatment for Acute Low Back Pain on Spine Shape Parameters: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Life 2021, 11, 845".

Authors:  Andreas Brandl; Christoph Egner; Robert Schleip
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Women's Respiratory Movements during Spontaneous Breathing and Physical Fitness: A Cross-Sectional, Correlational Study.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Liang; Zhen-Min Bai; Maiwulamu Aihemaiti; Lei Yuan; Zhi-Min Hong; Jing Xiao; Fei-Fei Ren; Osvaldas Rukšėnas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Exploring the Relationships between Resilience and Turnover Intention in Chinese High School Teachers: Considering the Moderating Role of Job Burnout.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Huaruo Chen; Jie Xu; Ya Wen; Tingting Fang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Connectivity Analysis for Multivariate Time Series: Correlation vs. Causality.

Authors:  Angeliki Papana
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.