Literature DB >> 3142349

Plasma bactericidal activity after administration of erythromycin estolate and erythromycin ethylsuccinate to healthy volunteers.

D Bérubé1, D Kirouac, D Croteau, M G Bergeron, M Lebel.   

Abstract

In a crossover design study, we compared the plasma bactericidal activities of erythromycin estolate (500 mg) and erythromycin ethylsuccinate (600 mg) after administration of a single oral dose to 12 healthy volunteers. Both erythromycin esters displayed very good plasma bactericidal activities against Streptococcus pneumoniae. The median bactericidal titers produced in plasma against Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae were significantly higher with erythromycin estolate than with the ethylsuccinate ester at both 2 and 8 h after dosing (P less than 0.05 by Student's t test). Both erythromycin esters showed rather weak bactericidal activity against Branhamella catarrhalis; a further look at these results indicated that erythromycin estolate presented 50% of the plasma samples at 2 h with bactericidal titers superior or equal to 1:8, versus 11% for the ethylsuccinate ester. Of the 60 plasma bactericidal activity tests performed against Staphylococcus aureus, only 6 (10%) and 3 (5%) exhibited titers of 1:8 or greater for erythromycin estolate and erythromycin ethylsuccinate, respectively. Clinical trials are warranted in which these products are compared in infections other than Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis, for which the clinical superiority of erythromycin estolate has been demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3142349      PMCID: PMC172382          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.32.8.1227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

1.  Effects of carbon dioxide upon the in vitro activity of erythromycin.

Authors:  W L Dibb; A Digranes; K L Bottolfsen
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1986-06

2.  Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of two macrolide antimicrobial agents: revised interpretive criteria for erythromycin and preliminary guidelines for roxithromycin (RU 965).

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; P C Fuchs; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a randomized controlled study of twice-daily erythromycin ethylsuccinate versus erythromycin estolate.

Authors:  C M Ginsburg; G H McCracken; J B Steinberg; S D Crow; B F Dildy; K Lancaster; K Olsen
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec

4.  Microbiological aspects of erythromycin.

Authors:  D A Preston
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb

5.  Erythromycin therapy for group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Results of a comparative study of the estolate and ethylsuccinate formulations.

Authors:  C M Ginsburg; G H McCracken; S D Crow; B R Dildy; G Morchower; J B Steinberg; K Lancaster
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1984-06

6.  Streptococcal pharyngitis therapy. A comparison of two erythromycin formulations.

Authors:  C W Derrick; H C Dillon
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1979-11

7.  High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of erythromycin and its esters using electrochemical detection.

Authors:  D Croteau; F Vallée; M G Bergeron; M LeBel
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1987-08-07

8.  Pharmacokinetic advantages of erythromycin estolate over ethylsuccinate as determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography.

Authors:  D Croteau; M G Bergeron; M LeBel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Selection of an oral erythromycin product.

Authors:  D G Fraser
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1980-09

10.  Antibacterial activity of 2'-esters of erythromycin.

Authors:  P L Tardrew; J C Mao; D Kenney
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-08
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bactericidal titers of loracarbef (LY 163892) in serum and killing rates in volunteers receiving 400 versus 200 milligrams.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.191

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.