| Literature DB >> 31423253 |
Dongning He1,2, Lei Wu1, Xiaoxi Li1, Xiaodan Liu1, Ping Ma1, Youhong Juang1.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer, for which no specific targete d therapy is currently available. The present study aimed to examine the associations of ecotropic virus integration site 1 (EVI-1) and calreticulin (CRT) with other clinicopathological variables and the prognosis of patients with TNBC. The present retrospective cohort study reviewed the medical records of patients with TNBC treated in the Affiliated Hospitals of Jinzhou Medical University between January 2010 and June 2015. The protein expression levels of EVI-1 and CRT in tumor samples obtained from the patients were examined by immunohistochemical analysis. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify associations between clinical characteristics and disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to observe the survival condition (DFS/OS) according to EVI-1 and CRT expression. A total of 88 TNBC patients were included in the present study. Tumor tissues in 52 (59.1%) patients were EVI-1 positive, and tumor tissues in 64 (72.7%) patients were CRT-positive, and these rates were significantly higher compared with those in the corresponding paracancerous tissues (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that EVI-1 and CRT expression levels were independent variables associated with OS and DFS, and high expression of both CRT and EVI-1 was significantly associated with decreased OS and DFS compared with the other subgroups (low EVI-1/low CRT expression, low EVI-1/high CRT expression and high EVI-1/low CRT expression) of patients with TNBC. EVI-1 and CRT expression in TNBC was significantly correlated with poor outcome. Evaluation of the EVI-1 and CRT status may provide insight into prognosis prediction for patients with TNBC.Entities:
Keywords: calreticulin; ecotropic virus integration-1; prognosis; triple-negative breast cancer; tumor tissue
Year: 2019 PMID: 31423253 PMCID: PMC6607142 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Immunohistochemical staining for EVI-1and CRT in triple-negative breast cancer tumor samples and paracancerous tissue. (A-C) EVI-1 staining from (A) weak (+), (B) medium (++) to (C) strong (+++). (D-F) CRT staining from (D) weak (+), (E) medium (++) to (F) strong (+++). (G) EV1-1 and CRT expression in paracancerous tissue as a control. Quantitative results for this staining are presented in the histogram, and the data represent the IOD/integrated optic density/area (within the EVI-1 or CRT positive group and compared with the negative control group). Significant differences were determined by the one-way analysis of variance followed by the least-significant difference test. Magnification, ×400. *P<0.05 vs. negative control; #P<0.05 vs. EVI-1(+). EVI-1, ecotropic virus integration site 1; CRT, calreticulin; IOD, integrated optic density; CON, control.
Patient clinicopathological characteristics (N=88).
| Characteristic | Category | N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30–45 | 21 (23.9) |
| 46–61 | 48 (54.5) | |
| 62–77 | 19 (21.6) | |
| Sex | Female | 88 (100) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | ≤18.49 | 2 (2.3) |
| 18.5–24.99 | 49 (55.7) | |
| 25-27.99 | 23 (26.1) | |
| 28–32 | 14 (15.9) | |
| Histopathological type | Invasive ductal/lobular carcinoma | 76 (86.4) |
| Apocrine carcinoma | 5 (5.7) | |
| Others | 7 (8.0) | |
| T-stage[ | T1 | 28 (31.8) |
| T2 | 58 (65.9) | |
| T3-T4 | 2 (2.3) | |
| Number of lymph nodes with metastasis | 0 | 53 (60.2) |
| ≤4 | 25 (28.4) | |
| >4 | 10 (11.4) | |
| Cancer-associated thrombosis | Yes | 72 (81.8) |
| No | 16 (18.2) | |
| Histological differentiation grade[ | Low/moderate | 35 (39.8) |
| High | 38 (43.2) | |
| Moderate/high | 15 (17.0) | |
| Pathological stage[ | I | 30 (34.1) |
| II | 41 (46.6) | |
| III | 17 (19.3) | |
| Ki-67 staining | Low (≤14%) | 9 (10.2) |
| High (>14%) | 79 (89.8) | |
| p53 staining | Negative | 40 (45.5) |
| Positive | 48 (54.5) | |
| Therapy following surgery | Similar standard treatment | 88 (100) |
According to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (32).
According to the WHO classification of breast tumors (2012) (41).
EVI-1 and CRT expression in TNBC tissues and paracancerous tissues (n=88).
| Status of EVI-1 protein expression, n (%) | Status of CRT expression, n (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue | N | High | Low | P-value | High | Low | P-value |
| TNBC | 88 | 52 (59.1) | 36 (40.9) | 0.003[ | 64 (72.7) | 24 (27.3) | 0.003[ |
| Adjacent normal | 88 | 10 (11.4) | 78 (88.6) | 0 | 88 (100) | ||
P<0.05. EVI-1, ecotropic virus integration-1; CRT, calreticulin; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.
Correlations between EVI-1 and CRT expression in cancer tissues and clinicopathological variables in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (n=88).
| EVI-1 | CRT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Category | Negative | Positive | P-value | Negative | Positive | P-value |
| Age (years) | 30–45 | 11 | 10 | 0.168[ | 1 | 20 | 0.020[ |
| 46–61 | 16 | 32 | 15 | 33 | |||
| 62–77 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 11 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | <18.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.692 | 1 | 1 | 0.427 |
| 18.5–24.99 | 22 | 27 | 16 | 33 | |||
| 25–28 | 7 | 16 | 5 | 18 | |||
| 28–32 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Histopathological type | Invasive ductal/lobular carcinoma | 29 | 47 | 0.031[ | 19 | 57 | 0.481 |
| Apocrine carcinoma | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | |||
| Others | 6 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |||
| Histological differentiation | Low/moderate | 13 | 22 | 0.251 | 9 | 26 | 0.952 |
| grade[ | High | 19 | 19 | 11 | 27 | ||
| Moderate/high | 4 | 11 | 4 | 11 | |||
| Cancer-associated | No | 34 | 38 | 0.012[ | 21 | 51 | 0.397 |
| thrombosis | Yes | 2 | 14 | 3 | 13 | ||
| T-stage[ | T1 | 13 | 15 | 0.728 | 11 | 17 | 0.183 |
| T2 | 22 | 36 | 13 | 45 | |||
| T3-T4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Number of lymph-node | 0 | 27 | 26 | 0.030[ | 16 | 37 | 0.419 |
| metastases | ≤4 | 8 | 17 | 7 | 18 | ||
| >4 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Pathological stage[ | I | 15 | 15 | 0.024[ | 11 | 19 | 0.183 |
| II | 19 | 22 | 11 | 30 | |||
| III | 2 | 15 | 2 | 15 | |||
| p53 | Negative | 17 | 23 | 0.830 | 12 | 28 | 0.637 |
| Positive | 19 | 29 | 12 | 36 | |||
| Ki-67 | ≤14% | 7 | 2 | 0.029[ | 7 | 2 | <0.001[ |
| >14% | 29 | 50 | 17 | 62 | |||
P<0.05. EVI-1, ecotropic virus integration-1; CRT, calreticulin.
According to WHO classification of breast tumors (2012) (41).
According to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (32).
Multivariate analysis of predictive factors for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (n=88).
| A, Overall survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | P-value |
| Age (46–61 years) | 4.175 | 1.06–16.44 | 0.041[ |
| Age (62–77 years) | 4.369 | 1.43–13.25 | 0.010[ |
| BMI (18.5–24.99 kg/m2) | 55.793 | 2.739–1136.489 | 0.009[ |
| Pathological stage (II) | 0.236 | 0.059–0.950 | 0.042[ |
| CRT | 1.506 | 0.516–4.394 | 0.453 |
| EVI-1 | 0.114 | 0.034–0.380 | <0.001[ |
| p53 | 2.688 | 1.153–6.266 | 0.022[ |
| Ki-67 | 0.066 | 0.007–0.578 | 0.014[ |
| BMI (18.5–24.99 kg/m2) | 76.399 | 4.347–1342.653 | 0.003[ |
| Pathological stage (II) | 0.219 | 0.051–0.937 | 0.041[ |
| Pathological stage (III) | 0.297 | 0.089–0.996 | 0.049[ |
| CRT | 3.667 | 1.255–10.715 | 0.018[ |
| EVI-1 | 0.097 | 0.027–0.344 | <0.001[ |
| p53 | 1.978 | 0.881–4.443 | 0.098[ |
| Ki-67 | 0.064 | 0.007–0.571 | 0.014[ |
P<0.05. EVI-1, ecotropic virus integration-1; CRT, calreticulin; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 2.Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with triple-negative breast cancer with a high EVI-1 expression level had significantly reduced (A) overall survival and (B) and disease-free survival compared with patients with a low EVI-1 expression level. The data were censored using maximum likelihood estimation. EVI-1, ecotropic virus integration site 1.
Figure 3.Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with triple-negative breast cancer with high a CRT expression level had (A) significantly reduced overall survival but (B) statistically similar disease-free survival compared with patients with a low CRT expression level. CRT, calreticulin.
Figure 4.Combination of EVI-1 and CRT expression as a prognostic biological marker. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrated that high expression of both EVI-1 and CRT was significantly associated with reduced OS (A) and DFS (B) in patients with TNBC; moreover, TNBC patients with high CRT/high EVI-1 expression had significantly reduced OS (C) and DFS (D) compared with patients in all other groups.