| Literature DB >> 31423124 |
Zahra Fatahi1, Neda Esfandiari2, Hamide Ehtesabi2, Zeinab Bagheri2, Hossein Tavana3, Zahra Ranjbar4, Hamid Latifi5.
Abstract
Carbon dots (Entities:
Keywords: bitter orange; carbon dots; cytotoxicity; imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 31423124 PMCID: PMC6694706 DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-1465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EXCLI J ISSN: 1611-2156 Impact factor: 4.068
Figure 1Schematic illustration of preparation of CDs from hydrothermal treatment of orange juice
Figure 2Fluorescent intensity of green synthesis CDs at different temperatures and time. CDs synthesized by hydrothermal treatment at 180 °C showed maximum fluorescent intensity.
Figure 3CDs characterization by UV-vis, fluorescent and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, dynamic light scattering and zeta potential analyzer: (a) UV-vis absorption, fluorescence excitation (λex= 365 nm) spectra of CDs at 200-450 nm, (b) Fluorescence intensity of CDs at different excitation wavelengths
Table 1CHN elemental analysis of synthesized CDs
Figure 4pH effect on the fluorescence of CDs. Optimum Fluorescence intensity was measured at neutral pH of 7.0
Figure 5Phase and fluorescence images of SKBR3 cells incubated with (a-b) 80 μg/mL of the CDs for 5 h, and (c-d) without CDs (negative control)
Figure 6Cytotoxicity tests. (a) MTT assay of SKBR3 cancer cells, (b) MTT assay of NIH/3T3 normal cells (after 24 h incubation of CDs), (c) LDH assay of SKBR3 cell line. The graph shows no obvious toxicity of CDs to both cancer and normal cells even at high concentrations. Values represent mean ± SEM (P ≤ 0.001, one way ANOVA).