| Literature DB >> 31422704 |
Chih-Hsuan Huang1,2, Hsin-Hung Wu3,4, Yii-Ching Lee5,6, Li Li7.
Abstract
The environment in health care organizations is becoming increasingly competitive. Therefore, to improve patient return rates, health care organizations need to examine how to enhance the physician-patient relationship. In particular, the role of patient gratitude on the physician-patient relationship in health care organizations is still ambiguous. The specific role of patient gratitude in the medical service industry needs to be identified. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate physician-patient interactions with reference to relationship marketing and to further understand the relationships among relationship quality, patient gratitude, and patient loyalty. The potential effects of patient gratitude on the physician-patient relationship were examined by testing mediation effect. The results demonstrated that patient gratitude had a notable effect on the association between relationship quality and patient loyalty. To improve the physician-patient relationship in the medical service industry, health care managements should not ignore the 3 relationship quality tactics perceived by patients, specially the role of the potential effect of patient gratitude on relational building.Entities:
Keywords: mediation; patient gratitude; patient loyalty; relationship quality
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31422704 PMCID: PMC6700843 DOI: 10.1177/0046958019868324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inquiry ISSN: 0046-9580 Impact factor: 1.730
Figure 1.The proposed research model in this study.
The Results of Mean, SD, Cronbach Alpha, CR, and AVE (n = 731).
| Construct | Mean |
| α | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | 3.901 | 0.5435 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.72 |
| Trust | 4.011 | 0.5717 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.87 |
| Commitment | 3.821 | 0.5902 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.75 |
| Patient loyalty | 3.744 | 0.6407 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.71 |
| Patient gratitude | 3.940 | 0.6069 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.86 |
Note. AVE = average variance extracted; CR = composite reliability.
Figure 2.Path modeling.
Note. S = satisfaction; t = trust; c = commitment.
aDirect effect.
bMediating effect.
**P < .01.
The Summary of Path Analysis.
| Hypothetical path (mediator) | Expected sign | Research results |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship quality → patient gratitude → patient loyalty |
| Support |
| Satisfaction → patient gratitude → patient loyalty |
| Support |
| Trust → patient gratitude → patient loyalty |
| Support |
| Commitment → patient gratitude → patient loyalty |
| Support |