Literature DB >> 31422351

Distinctive clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for different histologic subtypes of early cervical cancer.

Lijie Cao1,2, Hao Wen1,2, Zheng Feng1,2, Xiaotian Han1,2, Xiaohua Wu3,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for different histologic subtypes in early cervical cancer.
METHODS: Patients who underwent radical surgery for stage IA2-IIA2 cervical cancer with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma between March 2006 and February 2014 at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. The two-sample t-test was used to compare the mean values of continuous variables. The Chi-square test was used to assess differences in the distribution of categorical variables. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method using log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 5181 patients evaluated, 4510 had squamous cell carcinoma, 488 had adenocarcinoma, and 183 had adenosquamous carcinoma. Compared with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma was associated with earlier stage, smaller tumor size, less lymphovascular space invasion (26.7% vs 37.9%), less deep (>2/3 depth) stromal invasion (30.4% vs 36.2%), and more ovarian metastasis (4.2% vs 0.7%) (all p<0.001). Compared with adenosquamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma was associated with earlier stage (p=0.011), smaller tumor size (p<0.001), less lymphovascular space invasion (26.7% vs 41.5%, p<0.001), and less peripheral nerve infiltration (5.7% vs 15.4%, p<0.001). Except for more peripheral nerve infiltration in adenosquamous carcinoma (15.4% vs 8.4%, p=0.002), no significant differences in other clinicopathologic characteristics were noted between squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 85.1%, 78.2%, and 72.3% for squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma, respectively (p<0.001). Corresponding 5-year overall survival was 89.7%, 83.1%, and 79.6%, respectively (p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma were independent prognostic factors for worse recurrence-free survival for adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma (HR 2.594 (95% CI 2.030 to 3.316), p<0.001) and for adenosquamous carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma (HR 2.105 (95% CI 1.517 to 2.920), p<0.001), and overall survival for adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma (HR 2.976 (95% CI 2.226 to 3.977), p<0.001) and for adenosquamous carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma (HR 2.295 (95% CI 1.579 to 3.338), p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma carried distinctive patterns of clinicopathologic characteristics. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma had worse survival outcomes than squamous cell carcinoma. © IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31422351     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  4 in total

1.  BRD4 inhibition sensitizes cervical cancer to radiotherapy by attenuating DNA repair.

Authors:  Mengdong Ni; Jiajia Li; Haiyun Zhao; Fei Xu; Jingyi Cheng; Min Yu; Guihao Ke; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Cancer-Specific Mortality in Asian American Women Diagnosed with Gynecologic Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Pritesh S Karia; Parisa Tehranifar; Kala Visvanathan; Jason D Wright; Jeanine M Genkinger
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.090

3.  Desmoplastic Reaction and Tumor Budding in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma are Prognostic Factors for Distant Metastasis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Lanqing Cao; Ping-Li Sun; Yangyang He; Min Yao; Hongwen Gao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Beyond Sedlis-A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis.

Authors:  Kimberly Levinson; Anna L Beavis; Christopher Purdy; Anne F Rositch; Akila Viswanathan; Aaron H Wolfson; Michael G Kelly; Krishnansu S Tewari; Leah McNally; Saketh R Guntupalli; Omar Ragab; Yi-Chun Lee; David S Miller; Warner K Huh; Kelly J Wilkinson; Nicola M Spirtos; Linda Van Le; Yovanni Casablanca; Laura L Holman; Steven E Waggoner; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.304

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.