Literature DB >> 31422173

Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing.

Tim Rhodes1, Kari Lancaster2.   

Abstract

We outline a framework for conceptualising interventions in health as 'evidence-making interventions'. An evidence-making intervention (EMI) approach is distinct from a mainstream evidence-based intervention (EBI) approach in that it attends to health, evidence and intervention as matters of local knowledge-making practice. An EMI approach emphasises relational materiality and performativity, engaging with interventions, and their knowing, as matters-of-practice. Rather than concentrating on how 'evidenced interventions' are implemented 'into' given 'contexts' - as if evidence, intervention and context were stable and separate - an EMI approach focuses on the processes and practices through which 'evidence', 'intervention' and 'context' come to be. There are two strands to our analysis. First, we identify concepts to think-with in an EMI approach; and second, we illustrate their implications through case examples. We first reflect on developments in 'implementation science' to distinguish how an EMI approach thinks differently. We note a 'within-limits contingency' of implementation science in contrast to the 'open contingency' of an EMI approach. This helps notice the performativity of science and intervention as evidencing-making practices. We next conceptualise an EMI approach in relation to: 'objects and practices'; 'effects and events'; and 'concerns and care'. We position an EMI approach in relation to theories of 'relational materialism', arguing that this affords a more critical, as well as more careful, way of knowing and doing health intervention.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Evidencing; Implementation science; Intervention; Ontology; Relational materialism; Translation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31422173     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Ranking evidence in substance use and addiction.

Authors:  Hudson Reddon; Thomas Kerr; M-J Milloy
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Implementing a social network intervention: can the context for its workability be created? A quasi-ethnographic study.

Authors:  J Ellis; I Vassilev; E James; A Rogers
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2020-10-27

3.  Buprenorphine dispensing in an epicenter of the U.S. opioid epidemic: A case study of the rural risk environment in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Hannah Lf Cooper; David H Cloud; Patricia R Freeman; Monica Fadanelli; Travis Green; Connor Van Meter; Stephanie Beane; Umedjon Ibragimov; April M Young
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-03-26

Review 4.  Modelling the pandemic: attuning models to their contexts.

Authors:  Tim Rhodes; Kari Lancaster; Shelley Lees; Melissa Parker
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-06

5.  WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19.

Authors:  Jan M Stratil; Maike Voss; Laura Arnold
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-11

6.  "A matter of time": Evidence-making temporalities of vaccine development in the COVID-19 media landscape.

Authors:  Mia Harrison; Kari Lancaster; Tim Rhodes
Journal:  Time Soc       Date:  2022-02

7.  A qualitative study of repeat naloxone administrations during opioid overdose intervention by people who use opioids in New York City.

Authors:  Stephen Parkin; Joanne Neale; Caral Brown; Jermaine D Jones; Laura Brandt; Felipe Castillo; Aimee N C Campbell; John Strang; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-10-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.