Literature DB >> 31421734

Technical recommendations to perform the alkaline standard and enzyme-modified comet assay in human biomonitoring studies.

Amaya Azqueta1, Damian Muruzabal2, Elisa Boutet-Robinet3, Mirta Milic4, Maria Dusinska5, Gunnar Brunborg6, Peter Møller7, Andrew R Collins8.   

Abstract

The comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) is widely used as a biomonitoring tool to assess DNA damage - strand breaks, as well as oxidised bases; it can also be adapted to measure DNA repair. It is based on the ability of breaks in the DNA to relax supercoiling, allowing DNA loops to extend from the nuclear core (nucleoid) under an electric field to form a comet-like tail. Most commonly, it is applied to white blood cells. The range of detection is between a few hundred breaks per cell and a few thousand, encompassing levels of damage that can be repaired and tolerated by human cells. Its applications include monitoring various diseases, studying the influence of nutrition on DNA stability, and investigating effects of environmental and occupational mutagens. Here we address the issue of inter-laboratory variation in comet assay results. This variation is largely due to differences in methods. Imposing a standard protocol is not practical, but users should be aware of the crucial parameters that affect performance of the assay. These include the concentration of agarose in which the cells are embedded; the duration of cell lysis, and of enzyme incubation when oxidised bases are being measured; the duration of alkaline unwinding; the duration of electrophoresis and the voltage gradient applied; and the method used to score the comets. Including reference standards in each experiment allows experimental variability to be monitored - and if variation is not extreme, results can be normalised using reference standard values. Reference standards are also essential for inter-laboratory comparison. Finally, we offer recommendations which, we believe, will limit variability and increase the usefulness of this assay in molecular epidemiology.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Controls; DNA damage; Fpg-modified comet assay; Protocol; Recommendations; Standard comet assay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31421734     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

1.  Genotoxicity of Particles From Grinded Plastic Items in Caco-2 and HepG2 Cells.

Authors:  Martin Roursgaard; Monika Hezareh Rothmann; Juliane Schulte; Ioanna Karadimou; Elena Marinelli; Peter Møller
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 2.  Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Eugenia Cordelli; Margherita Bignami; Francesca Pacchierotti
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Biomarkers of nucleic acid oxidation - A summary state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Mu-Rong Chao; Mark D Evans; Chiung-Wen Hu; Yunhee Ji; Peter Møller; Pavel Rossner; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 11.799

4.  Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay.

Authors:  Mahsa Karbaschi; Yunhee Ji; Abdulhadi Mohammed S Abdulwahed; Alhanoof Alohaly; Juan F Bedoya; Shanna L Burke; Thomas M Boulos; Helen G Tempest; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Detection of DNA damage by alkaline comet assay in mouse colonic mucosa.

Authors:  Elisa Boutet-Robinet; Maria M Haykal; Saleha Hashim; Teresa Frisan; Océane C B Martin
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-10-23

Review 6.  Fluorescence Sheds Light on DNA Damage, DNA Repair, and Mutations.

Authors:  Norah A Owiti; Zachary D Nagel; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-11-14

7.  Oxidative damage and DNA repair in desiccated recalcitrant embryonic axes of Acer pseudoplatanus L.

Authors:  Beata P Plitta-Michalak; Alice A Ramos; Piotr Pupel; Marcin Michalak
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.215

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.