| Literature DB >> 31421667 |
Patrinee Traisathit1, Saïk Urien2,3,4, Sophie Le Coeur5,6,7, Sakulrat Srirojana8, Noppadon Akarathum9, Suparat Kanjanavanit10, Chaiwat Ngampiyaskul11, Sawitree Krikajornkitti12, Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong5,6,13, Marc Lallemant6, Gonzague Jourdain14,15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral treatment (ART) has been shown to have a beneficial effect on the weight evolution but its effect on height remains unclear. We described patterns of height evolution and identified predictors of catch-up growth in HIV-infected children on ART.Entities:
Keywords: Asia, antiretroviral therapy, catch-up growth, height-growth velocity, HIV-infected children, Thailand
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31421667 PMCID: PMC6697969 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1663-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Baseline characteristics of 477 HIV-infected children
| N (%) or median [IQR] | All | Height-for-age z-score at ART initiation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <−3 SD | −3 to < − 2 SD | − 2 to < − 1 SD | ≥ − 1 SD | |||
| All | 477 | 116 (24%) | 119 (25%) | 119 (25%) | 123 (26%) | |
| Male | 206 (43%) | 56 (48%) | 55 (46%) | 43 (36%) | 52 (42%) | 0.25a |
| Age (years) | 6.2 [1.8–9.6] | 7.7 [5.1–10.6] | 7.4 [3.9–9.9] | 5.6 [1.5–9.5] | 2.0 [0.8–6.5] | < 0.001b |
| ART regimen | < 0.001a | |||||
| Dual NRTI-based regimen | 41 (9%) | 1 (1%) | 5 (4%) | 15 (13%) | 20 (16%) | |
| PI-based regimen | 57 (12%) | 5 (4%) | 8 (7%) | 16 (13%) | 28 (23%) | |
| NNRTI-based regimen | 379 (79%) | 110 (95%) | 106 (89%) | 88 (74%) | 75 (61%) | |
| CD4 percentage | 9 [2–17] | 5 [1–11] | 4 [1–13] | 11 [4–18] | 16 [10–23] | < 0.001b |
| HIV-RNA load (log10copies/mL) | 5.17 [4.69–5.67] | 5.16 [4.74–5.59] | 5.20 [4.66–5.62] | 5.13 [4.82–5.55] | 5.22 [4.41–5.89] | 0.98b |
| CDC HIV classification stage | < 0.001a | |||||
| N | 87 (18%) | 12 (10%) | 15 (13%) | 20 (17%) | 40 (33%) | |
| A | 136 (28%) | 25 (22%) | 32 (27%) | 41 (34%) | 38 (31%) | |
| B | 132 (28%) | 34 (29%) | 32 (27%) | 38 (32%) | 28 (23%) | |
| C | 17 (26%) | 45 (39%) | 40 (33%) | 20 (17%) | 17 (23%) | |
| Weight-for-age z-score | < 0.001a | |||||
| < −3 SD | 18 (4%) | 9 (8%) | 7 (6%) | 1 (1%) | 1 (1%) | |
| − 3 to <−2 SD | 59 (12%) | 33 (28%) | 12 (10%) | 12 (10%) | 2 (2%) | |
| − 2 to <−1 SD | 196 (41%) | 66 (57%) | 68 (57%) | 46 (39%) | 16 (13%) | |
| ≥ 1 SD | 204 (43%) | 8 (7%) | 32 (27%) | 60 (50%) | 104 (84%) | |
| Weight-for-height z-score | 0.72a | |||||
| < −3 SD | 5 (1%) | 2 (2%) | 2 (2%) | 1 (1%) | – | |
| – 3 to <−2 SD | 27 (6%) | 7 (6%) | 9 (7%) | 6 (5%) | 5 (4%) | |
| – 2 to <−1 SD | 95 (20%) | 27 (23%) | 25 (21%) | 22 (18%) | 21 (17%) | |
| ≥ −1 SD | 350 (73%) | 80 (69%) | 83 (70%) | 90 (76%) | 97 (79%) | |
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, IQR interquartile range, N number of children in category
a Chi-square test
b Kruskal-Wallis test
Association between Height-for-age z scores at last visit and AIDS-defining events
| AIDS-defining events | All | Height-for-age z-score at last follow-up visit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <−3 SD | -3 to < −2 SD | -2 to < − 1 SD | ≥ − 1 SD | |||
| No | 419 (88%) | 41 (82%) | 63 (84%) | 111 (89%) | 204 (90%) | 0.31a |
| Yes | 58 (12%) | 9 (18%) | 12 (16%) | 14 (11%) | 23 (10%) | |
a Chi-square test
Fig. 1Height, normalized for 180 cm, as a function of age (a) male (b) female: the red curve stands for the median and the blue curves for the 25th, 75th percentiles, obtained from 100 simulations of the final model. Height measurements on the Y axis are divided by180 cm
Fig. 2Relative observed versus predicted height from the population and individual models fits (a) population parameters among males (b) individual parameters among males (c) population parameters among females and (d) individual parameters among females: Y axis value 1 stands for 180 cm