Takahiro Otani1, Hiroshi Ichikawa2, Takaaki Hanyu1, Takashi Ishikawa1, Yosuke Kano1, Tatsuo Kanda3, Shin-Ichi Kosugi4, Toshifumi Wakai1. 1. Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. 2. Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. Electronic address: hichikawa-nii@med.niigata-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Surgery, Sanjo General Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 4. Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is known to lead to deterioration in respiratory function (RF). The aim of this study was to assess long-term trends in RF after esophagectomy and the impact of different operative procedures. METHODS: A total of 52 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who were scheduled for esophagectomy from 2003 to 2012 were enrolled. We prospectively evaluated patients for vital capacity (VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) before and after esophagectomy at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 mo. RESULTS: Patients had mostly recovered their VC and FEV1.0 after 12 mo. After that point, VC and FEV1.0 declined again, reaching levels lower than baseline at 60 mo, with a median change ratio of 0.85 and 0.86, respectively. Although the 6MWD after open esophagectomy declined, patients treated with transhiatal esophagectomy and minimally invasive esophagectomy maintained above baseline levels throughout the follow-up period. Furthermore, we identified transhiatal esophagectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.002-0.43, P = 0.01) and minimally invasive esophagectomy (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.94, P = 0.04) as favorable factors and postoperative pulmonary complication (OR = 9.14, 95% CI 1.22-68.6, P = 0.03) as an unfavorable factor for RF after 12 mo. Operative procedures had no significant impact on RF after 60 mo. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the notion that RF does not recover to the baseline level, and operative procedures have no significant impact on RF at late phase after esophagectomy.
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is known to lead to deterioration in respiratory function (RF). The aim of this study was to assess long-term trends in RF after esophagectomy and the impact of different operative procedures. METHODS: A total of 52 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who were scheduled for esophagectomy from 2003 to 2012 were enrolled. We prospectively evaluated patients for vital capacity (VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) before and after esophagectomy at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 mo. RESULTS:Patients had mostly recovered their VC and FEV1.0 after 12 mo. After that point, VC and FEV1.0 declined again, reaching levels lower than baseline at 60 mo, with a median change ratio of 0.85 and 0.86, respectively. Although the 6MWD after open esophagectomy declined, patients treated with transhiatal esophagectomy and minimally invasive esophagectomy maintained above baseline levels throughout the follow-up period. Furthermore, we identified transhiatal esophagectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.002-0.43, P = 0.01) and minimally invasive esophagectomy (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.94, P = 0.04) as favorable factors and postoperative pulmonary complication (OR = 9.14, 95% CI 1.22-68.6, P = 0.03) as an unfavorable factor for RF after 12 mo. Operative procedures had no significant impact on RF after 60 mo. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the notion that RF does not recover to the baseline level, and operative procedures have no significant impact on RF at late phase after esophagectomy.