Literature DB >> 31421339

Repeated pressurization as a potential cause of deterioration in virus removal by aged reverse osmosis membrane used in households.

Shotaro Torii1, Takashi Hashimoto2, An Thuan Do3, Hiroaki Furumai4, Hiroyuki Katayama2.   

Abstract

Reverse osmosis (RO) membrane is widely used for household water treatment in areas with limited access to safe drinking water; however, some studies documented deterioration in the quality of RO permeate. Repeated pressurization from intermittent operation in households is suspected to have an adverse effect on RO. This study aimed to evaluate virus removal by RO used in actual households as well as the water quality of permeate, and to elucidate the main cause of RO deterioration. We conducted a survey in households in Hanoi, Vietnam, to collect 27 membranes along with their usage history, where virus removal was investigated in laboratory. Of the used RO membranes, 22% did not show the protective level, >3 log10 (99.9%) virus removal, recommended by World Health Organization. The differences in virus removal among Aichi virus, MS2 and φX-174 were <0.5 log10. All membranes with estimated pressurization times of <4000 showed >3 log10 virus removal, while 17% of membranes used for <3years, the manufacturers' warranty period, did not achieve the criterion. Therefore, virus removal performance may not be assured even if the users replace the membrane following the warranty period. Furthermore, more pressurized membranes exhibited significantly lower virus removal than less pressurized ones, suggesting a major role of repeated pressurization in the deterioration of RO. Coliforms were detected from 44% of the permeate of the point-of-use devices applying RO (RO-POU), raising concerns on the extrinsic contamination and regrowth of bacteria. Consequently, RO in households may deteriorate more rapidly than the manufactures' expectation due to repeated pressurization. RO in households should be replaced based on not only membrane age but also total pressurized times (i.e., 4000 times) to keep the protective level of virus removal. The deteriorated bacterial quality in RO permeate suggested the need for installing post-treatment, such as UV irradiation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Household water treatment; Membrane deterioration; Repeated pressurization; Reverse osmosis; Virus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31421339     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in aqueous virus removal technologies.

Authors:  Hussein E Al-Hazmi; Hanieh Shokrani; Amirhossein Shokrani; Karam Jabbour; Otman Abida; Seyed Soroush Mousavi Khadem; Sajjad Habibzadeh; Shirish H Sonawane; Mohammad Reza Saeb; Adrián Bonilla-Petriciolet; Michael Badawi
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 8.943

Review 2.  Comparative effectiveness of membrane technologies and disinfection methods for virus elimination in water: A review.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Lihui Guo; Yu Yang; Kumiko Oguma; Li-An Hou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Removal of viruses from their cocktail solution by liquid-crystalline water-treatment membranes.

Authors:  Daniel Kuo; Takeshi Sakamoto; Shotaro Torii; Miaomiao Liu; Hiroyuki Katayama; Takashi Kato
Journal:  Polym J       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.135

Review 4.  A critical review on the existing wastewater treatment methods in the COVID-19 era: What is the potential of advanced oxidation processes in combatting viral especially SARS-CoV-2?

Authors:  Milad Mousazadeh; Işık Kabdaşlı; Sara Khademi; Miguel Angel Sandoval; Seyedeh Parvin Moussavi; Fatemeh Malekdar; Vishakha Gilhotra; Marjan Hashemi; Mohammad Hadi Dehghani
Journal:  J Water Process Eng       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 5.  Chemical Nature of Metals and Metal-Based Materials in Inactivation of Viruses.

Authors:  Haozhong Tian; Bin He; Yongguang Yin; Lihong Liu; Jianbo Shi; Ligang Hu; Guibin Jiang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.719

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.