Literature DB >> 31421123

Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes.

Yuko M Komesu1, Darrell L Dinwiddie2, Holly E Richter3, Emily S Lukacz4, Vivian W Sung5, Nazema Y Siddiqui6, Halina M Zyczynski7, Beri Ridgeway8, Rebecca G Rogers9, Lily A Arya10, Donna Mazloomdoost11, Josh Levy12, Benjamin Carper12, Marie G Gantz12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the vaginal and urinary microbiomes have been increasingly well-characterized in health and disease, few have described the relationship between these neighboring environments. Elucidating this relationship has implications for understanding how manipulation of the vaginal microbiome may affect the urinary microbiome and treatment of common urinary conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship between urinary and vaginal microbiomes using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We hypothesized that the composition of the urinary and vaginal microbiomes would be significantly associated, with similarities in predominant taxa. STUDY
DESIGN: This multicenter study collected vaginal swabs and catheterized urine samples from 186 women with mixed urinary incontinence enrolled in a parent study and 84 similarly aged controls. Investigators decided a priori that if vaginal and/or urinary microbiomes differed between continent and incontinent women, the groups would be analyzed separately; if similar, samples from continent and incontinent women would be pooled and analyzed together. A central laboratory sequenced variable regions 1-3 (v1-3) and characterized bacteria to the genus level. Operational taxonomic unit abundance was described for paired vaginal and urine samples. Pearson's correlation characterized the relationship between individual operational taxonomic units of paired samples. Canonical correlation analysis evaluated the association between clinical variables (including mixed urinary incontinence and control status) and vaginal and urinary operational taxonomic units, using the Canonical correlation analysis function in the Vegan package (R version 3.5). Linear discriminant analysis effect size was used to find taxa that discriminated between vaginal and urinary samples.
RESULTS: Urinary and vaginal samples were collected from 212 women (mean age 53±11 years) and results from 197 paired samples were available for analysis. As operational taxonomic units in mixed urinary incontinence and control samples were related in canonical correlation analysis and since taxa did not discriminate between mixed urinary incontinence or controls in either vagina or urine, mixed urinary incontinence and control samples were pooled for further analysis. Canonical correlation analysis of vaginal and urinary samples indicated that that 60 of the 100 most abundant operational taxonomic units in the samples largely overlapped. Lactobacillus was the most abundant genus in both urine and vagina (contributing on average 53% to an individual's urine sample and 64% to an individual's vaginal sample) (Pearson correlation r=0.53). Although less abundant than Lactobacillus, other bacteria with high Pearson correlation coefficients also commonly found in vagina and urine included: Gardnerella (r=0.70), Prevotella (r=0.64), and Ureaplasma (r=0.50). Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis identified Tepidimonas and Flavobacterium as bacteria that distinguished the urinary environment for both mixed urinary incontinence and controls as these bacteria were absent in the vagina (Tepidimonas effect size 2.38, P<.001, Flavobacterium effect size 2.15, P<.001). Although Lactobacillus was the most abundant bacteria in both urine and vagina, it was more abundant in the vagina (linear discriminant analysis effect size effect size 2.72, P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Significant associations between vaginal and urinary microbiomes were demonstrated, with Lactobacillus being predominant in both urine and vagina. Abundance of other bacteria also correlated highly between the vagina and urine. This inter-relatedness has implications for studying manipulation of the urogenital microbiome in treating conditions such as urgency urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lactobacillus; mixed urinary incontinence; urinary microbiome; urologic conditions; vaginal microbiome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31421123      PMCID: PMC6995424          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  17 in total

1.  Gardnerella Exposures Alter Bladder Gene Expression and Augment Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Urinary Tract Infection in Mice.

Authors:  Nicole M Gilbert; Valerie P O'Brien; Chevaughn Waller; Ekatherina Batourina; Cathy Lee Mendelsohn; Amanda L Lewis
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.073

2.  Commensal Urinary Lactobacilli Inhibit Major Uropathogens In Vitro With Heterogeneity at Species and Strain Level.

Authors:  James A Johnson; Lydia F Delaney; Vaishali Ojha; Medha Rudraraju; Kaylie R Hintze; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Tatyana A Sysoeva
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.073

Review 3.  Urinary Microbiome: Yin and Yang of the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Virginia Perez-Carrasco; Ana Soriano-Lerma; Miguel Soriano; José Gutiérrez-Fernández; Jose A Garcia-Salcedo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 4.  Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health.

Authors:  Wallace Jeng Yang Chee; Shu Yih Chew; Leslie Thian Lung Than
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Longitudinal variability in the urinary microbiota of healthy premenopausal women and the relation to neighboring microbial communities: A pilot study.

Authors:  Lena M Biehl; Fedja Farowski; Catharina Hilpert; Angela Nowag; Anne Kretzschmar; Nathalie Jazmati; Anastasia Tsakmaklis; Imke Wieters; Yascha Khodamoradi; Hilmar Wisplinghoff; Maria J G T Vehreschild
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Bladder Microbiome in the Context of Urological Disorders-Is There a Biomarker Potential for Interstitial Cystitis?

Authors:  Thomas Bschleipfer; Isabell Karl
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-22

7.  Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?

Authors:  Sarah E Brown; Courtney K Robinson; Michelle D Shardell; Johanna B Holm; Jacques Ravel; Khalil G Ghanem; Rebecca M Brotman
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Association between the urogenital microbiome and surgical treatment response in women undergoing midurethral sling operation for mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Megan U Carnes; Yuko M Komesu; Emily S Lukacz; Lily Arya; Megan Bradley; Rebecca G Rogers; Vivian W Sung; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Benjamin Carper; Donna Mazloomdoost; Darryl Dinwiddie; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 10.693

9.  Lack of Evidence for Microbiota in the Placental and Fetal Tissues of Rhesus Macaques.

Authors:  Kevin R Theis; Roberto Romero; Andrew D Winters; Alan H Jobe; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 10.  Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: A Mystery in Search of Better Model Systems.

Authors:  Benjamin O Murray; Carlos Flores; Corin Williams; Deborah A Flusberg; Elizabeth E Marr; Karolina M Kwiatkowska; Joseph L Charest; Brett C Isenberg; Jennifer L Rohn
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.