Julia Vergier1, Pauline Bottin2, Jacqueline Saias2, Rachel Reynaud1,3, Catherine Guillemain2,4, Blandine Courbiere2,5. 1. Assistance-Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Service de Pédiatrie Multidisciplinaire, Hôpital de la Timone Enfants, Marseille, France. 2. Assistance-Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, Centre Clinico-biologique AMP-CECOS, Plateforme Cancer et Fertilité ONCOPACA-Corse, Marseille, France. 3. Aix Marseille Univ, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1251, Marseille Medical Genetics (MMG), Marseille, France. 4. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, MMG, UMR_S 1251, Marseille, France. 5. Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IBME, Marseille, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Turner syndrome (TS) is responsible for gonadal dysgenesis with high risk of premature ovarian insufficiency. Little is known about fertility preservation (FP) strategies is this population. DESIGN: Data from women with TS consulting with a fertility specialist in our FP centre from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively collected. MEASUREMENT: Total number of mature oocytes cryopreserved using vitrification. PATIENTS: Nine women with TS were referred. Three women with different karyotypes underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte vitrification. Mean age at TS diagnosis was 13.7 years [9-20]. Mean referral delay between TS diagnosis and fertility consultation was 9.7 years [7-14]. First counselling for FP was provided at 23.7 years [18-28]. Mean AMH serum level prior to COS was 53.8 pmol/L [3.6-95]. RESULTS: All three women succeeded in obtaining cryopreserved oocytes with a mean number of 15.3 per woman [9-20] and 9.2 per COS cycle [2-20]. Ovarian response to COS was unexpectedly remarkable for the woman with a complete 45,X monosomy. Procedure was well tolerated for all women. None of them have used oocytes for in vitro fertilization yet. CONCLUSIONS: Independently of karyotype, antral follicular count, AMH and FSH levels seemed to be reliable predictive markers of oocyte cryopreservation success. In a monosomic TS woman, cryptic ovarian mosaicism could explain a successful ovarian response to stimulation with a high number of retrieved oocytes. In case of spontaneous menarche, TS adolescents should be referred during transition to adulthood for FP counselling to avoid referral delay and limit time-related diminished ovarian reserve.
OBJECTIVE:Turner syndrome (TS) is responsible for gonadal dysgenesis with high risk of premature ovarian insufficiency. Little is known about fertility preservation (FP) strategies is this population. DESIGN: Data from women with TS consulting with a fertility specialist in our FP centre from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively collected. MEASUREMENT: Total number of mature oocytes cryopreserved using vitrification. PATIENTS: Nine women with TS were referred. Three women with different karyotypes underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte vitrification. Mean age at TS diagnosis was 13.7 years [9-20]. Mean referral delay between TS diagnosis and fertility consultation was 9.7 years [7-14]. First counselling for FP was provided at 23.7 years [18-28]. Mean AMH serum level prior to COS was 53.8 pmol/L [3.6-95]. RESULTS: All three women succeeded in obtaining cryopreserved oocytes with a mean number of 15.3 per woman [9-20] and 9.2 per COS cycle [2-20]. Ovarian response to COS was unexpectedly remarkable for the woman with a complete 45,X monosomy. Procedure was well tolerated for all women. None of them have used oocytes for in vitro fertilization yet. CONCLUSIONS: Independently of karyotype, antral follicular count, AMH and FSH levels seemed to be reliable predictive markers of oocyte cryopreservation success. In a monosomic TS woman, cryptic ovarian mosaicism could explain a successful ovarian response to stimulation with a high number of retrieved oocytes. In case of spontaneous menarche, TS adolescents should be referred during transition to adulthood for FP counselling to avoid referral delay and limit time-related diminished ovarian reserve.
Authors: L Strypstein; E Van Moer; J Nekkebroeck; I Segers; H Tournaye; I Demeestere; M-M Dolmans; W Verpoest; M De Vos Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 3.412