Hugh Morris1, Ari M Hietala2, Steven Jansen3, Javier Ribera1, Sabine Rosner4, Khalifah A Salmeia5, Francis W M R Schwarze1. 1. Laboratory for Cellulose & Wood Materials, Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland. 2. Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Ås, Norway. 3. Institute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. 4. Institute of Botany, BOKU Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 5. Laboratory of Advanced Fibers, Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In trees, secondary metabolites (SMs) are essential for determining the effectiveness of defence systems against fungi and why defences are sometimes breached. Using the CODIT model (Compartmentalization of Damage/Dysfunction in Trees), we explain defence processes at the cellular level. CODIT is a highly compartmented defence system that relies on the signalling, synthesis and transport of defence compounds through a three-dimensional lattice of parenchyma against the spread of decay fungi in xylem. SCOPE: The model conceptualizes 'walls' that are pre-formed, formed during and formed after wounding events. For sapwood, SMs range in molecular size, which directly affects performance and the response times in which they can be produced. When triggered, high-molecular weight SMs such as suberin and lignin are synthesized slowly (phytoalexins), but can also be in place at the time of wounding (phytoanticipins). In contrast, low-molecular weight phenolic compounds such as flavonoids can be manufactured de novo (phytoalexins) rapidly in response to fungal colonization. De novo production of SMs can be regulated in response to fungal pathogenicity levels. The protective nature of heartwood is partly based on the level of accumulated antimicrobial SMs (phytoanticipins) during the transitionary stage into a normally dead substance. Effectiveness against fungal colonization in heartwood is largely determined by the genetics of the host. CONCLUSION: Here we review recent advances in our understanding of the role of SMs in trees in the context of CODIT, with emphasis on the relationship between defence, carbohydrate availability and the hydraulic system.We also raise the limitations of the CODIT model and suggest its modification, encompassing other defence theory concepts. We envisage the development of a new defence system that is modular based and incorporates all components (and organs) of the tree from micro- to macro-scales.
BACKGROUND: In trees, secondary metabolites (SMs) are essential for determining the effectiveness of defence systems against fungi and why defences are sometimes breached. Using the CODIT model (Compartmentalization of Damage/Dysfunction in Trees), we explain defence processes at the cellular level. CODIT is a highly compartmented defence system that relies on the signalling, synthesis and transport of defence compounds through a three-dimensional lattice of parenchyma against the spread of decay fungi in xylem. SCOPE: The model conceptualizes 'walls' that are pre-formed, formed during and formed after wounding events. For sapwood, SMs range in molecular size, which directly affects performance and the response times in which they can be produced. When triggered, high-molecular weight SMs such as suberin and lignin are synthesized slowly (phytoalexins), but can also be in place at the time of wounding (phytoanticipins). In contrast, low-molecular weight phenolic compounds such as flavonoids can be manufactured de novo (phytoalexins) rapidly in response to fungal colonization. De novo production of SMs can be regulated in response to fungal pathogenicity levels. The protective nature of heartwood is partly based on the level of accumulated antimicrobial SMs (phytoanticipins) during the transitionary stage into a normally dead substance. Effectiveness against fungal colonization in heartwood is largely determined by the genetics of the host. CONCLUSION: Here we review recent advances in our understanding of the role of SMs in trees in the context of CODIT, with emphasis on the relationship between defence, carbohydrate availability and the hydraulic system.We also raise the limitations of the CODIT model and suggest its modification, encompassing other defence theory concepts. We envisage the development of a new defence system that is modular based and incorporates all components (and organs) of the tree from micro- to macro-scales.
Authors: Aleksandra Słupianek; Anna Kasprowicz-Maluśki; Elżbieta Myśkow; Magdalena Turzańska; Katarzyna Sokołowska Journal: New Phytol Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: F R Terras; K Eggermont; V Kovaleva; N V Raikhel; R W Osborn; A Kester; S B Rees; S Torrekens; F Van Leuven; J Vanderleyden Journal: Plant Cell Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Nina Elisabeth Nagy; Hans Ragnar Norli; Monica Fongen; Runa Berg Østby; Inger M Heldal; Jahn Davik; Ari M Hietala Journal: Planta Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 4.116
Authors: Shanshan Yang; Frank J Sterck; Ute Sass-Klaassen; J Hans C Cornelissen; Richard S P van Logtestijn; Mariet Hefting; Leo Goudzwaard; Juan Zuo; Lourens Poorter Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 5.753