Literature DB >> 31420208

The effects of chemotherapy on energy metabolic aspects in cancer patients: A systematic review.

Timia Van Soom1, Samera El Bakkali1, Nick Gebruers2, Hanne Verbelen1, Wiebren Tjalma3, Eric van Breda4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cancer survival rates have increased significantly creating more awareness for comorbidities affecting the Quality of Life. Chemotherapy may induce serious metabolic alterations. These complications can create an energy imbalance, worsening prognosis. The effect of chemotherapy on energy metabolism remains largely unknown. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the impact of chemotherapy on energy metabolism, creating more insight in a patients' energy requirements.
METHODS: We identified relevant studies up to May 2nd, 2019 using PubMed and Web of Science. Studies including all types of cancer and stages were selected. Only patients that underwent chemotherapy whether or not followed by surgery or radiotherapy were selected. Maximum follow-up was set at 6 months. Resting energy expenditure (REE), measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) or predicted by the Harris-Benedict equation (HBEq), was our primary outcome. Results regarding body composition were considered as secondary outcome parameter.
RESULTS: 16 studies were selected, including 267 patients. Overall, a significant decrease in REE [-1.5% to -24.91%] 1-month post-chemotherapy was reported. Two studies on breast cancer conducted a 3 and 6-month follow-up and found an increase in REE of 4.01% and 5.72% (p < .05), revealing a U-shaped curve in the expression of REE. Changes are accompanied by (non)significant variations in body composition (Fatmass (FM) and Fatfree Mass (FFM)). HBEq tends to underestimate REE by 4.03%-27.1%.
CONCLUSION: Alterations in REE, accompanied by changes in body composition, are found during and after chemotherapy in all cancer types and stages, revealing a U-shaped curve. Changes in FFM are suggested to induce variations in REE concomitant to catabolic effects of the disease and administered drug. HBEq tends to underestimate REE, stressing the need for adequate assessment to meet patients' energy requirements and support dietary needs.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy metabolism; Indirect calorimetry; Nutrition; Oncology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31420208     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  4 in total

Review 1.  Energy balance in cancer survivors at risk of weight gain: a review.

Authors:  Jessica McNeil
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.865

2.  Nutritional Status and Other Clinical Variables Are Associated to the Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Validity Study.

Authors:  Samuel Ramos-Acevedo; Luis Rodríguez-Gómez; Sonia López-Cisneros; Ailema González-Ortiz; Ángeles Espinosa-Cuevas
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 3.  Metabolomics in cancer research and emerging applications in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Daniel R Schmidt; Rutulkumar Patel; David G Kirsch; Caroline A Lewis; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 286.130

4.  Nutritional Intervention Contributes to the Improvement of Symptoms Related to Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ana Priscilla Silva de Souza; Luciana Câmara da Silva; Ana Paula Trussardi Fayh
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.