Literature DB >> 31419680

Exploiting OMI NO2 satellite observations to infer fossil-fuel CO2 emissions from U.S. megacities.

Daniel L Goldberg1, Zifeng Lu2, Tomohiro Oda3, Lok N Lamsal4, Fei Liu4, Debora Griffin5, Chris A McLinden5, Nickolay A Krotkov6, Bryan N Duncan6, David G Streets2.   

Abstract

Fossil-fuel CO2 emissions and their trends in eight U.S. megacities during 2006-2017 are inferred by combining satellite-derived NOX emissions with bottom-up city-specific NOX-to-CO2 emission ratios. A statistical model is fit to a collection NO2 plumes observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), and is used to calculate top-down NOX emissions. Decreases in OMI-derived NOX emissions are observed across the eight cities from 2006 to 2017 (-17% in Miami to -58% in Los Angeles), and are generally consistent with long-term trends of bottom-up inventories (-25% in Miami to -49% in Los Angeles), but there are some interannual discrepancies. City-specific NOX-to-CO2 emission ratios, used to calculate inferred CO2, are estimated through annual bottom-up inventories of NOX and CO2 emissions disaggregated to 1 × 1 km2 resolution. Over the study period, NOX-to-CO2 emission ratios have decreased by ~40% nationwide (-24% to -51% for our studied cities), which is attributed to a faster reduction in NOX when compared to CO2 due to policy regulations and fuel type shifts. Combining top-down NOX emissions and bottom-up NOX-to-CO2 emission ratios, annual fossil-fuel CO2 emissions are derived. Inferred OMI-based top-down CO2 emissions trends vary between +7% in Dallas to -31% in Phoenix. For 2017, we report annual fossil-fuel CO2 emissions to be: Los Angeles 113 ± 49 Tg/yr; New York City 144 ± 62 Tg/yr; and Chicago 55 ± 24 Tg/yr. A study in the Los Angeles area, using independent methods, reported a 2013-2016 average CO2 emissions rate of 104 Tg/yr and 120 Tg/yr, which suggests that the CO2 emissions from our method are in good agreement with other studies' top-down estimates. We anticipate future remote sensing instruments - with better spatial and temporal resolution - will better constrain the NOX-to-CO2 ratio and reduce the uncertainty in our method.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO(2) emissions; NO(x) emissions; OMI NO(2); Top-down emissions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31419680     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Disentangling the Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdowns on Urban NO2 From Natural Variability.

Authors:  Daniel L Goldberg; Susan C Anenberg; Debora Griffin; Chris A McLinden; Zifeng Lu; David G Streets
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 5.576

2.  TROPOMI NO2 in the United States: A Detailed Look at the Annual Averages, Weekly Cycles, Effects of Temperature, and Correlation With Surface NO2 Concentrations.

Authors:  Daniel L Goldberg; Susan C Anenberg; Gaige Hunter Kerr; Arash Mohegh; Zifeng Lu; David G Streets
Journal:  Earths Future       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 7.495

3.  The short-term impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on socioeconomic activities in China based on the OMI-NO2 data.

Authors:  Hongye Cao; Ling Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Daily CO2 Emission Reduction Indicates the Control of Activities to Contain COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Yuankang Xiong; Xiaofan Xing; Ruipu Yang; Jiarong Li; Yijing Wang; Junji Cao; Yves Balkanski; Josep Peñuelas; Philippe Ciais; Didier Hauglustaine; Jordi Sardans; Jianmin Chen; Jianmin Ma; Tang Xu; Haidong Kan; Yan Zhang; Tomohiro Oda; Lidia Morawska; Renhe Zhang; Shu Tao
Journal:  Innovation (Camb)       Date:  2020-11-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.