Literature DB >> 31419640

Development of Malignancy-Risk Gene Signature Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk.

James Sun1, Dung-Tsa Chen2, Jiannong Li2, Weihong Sun1, Sean J Yoder3, Tania E Mesa3, Marek Wloch4, Richard Roetzheim1, Christine Laronga1, M Catherine Lee5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) risk assessment models are statistical estimates based on patient characteristics. We developed a gene expression assay to assess BC risk using benign breast biopsy tissue.
METHODS: A NanoString-based malignancy risk (MR) gene signature was validated for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. It was applied to FFPE benign and BC specimens obtained from women who underwent breast biopsy, some of whom developed BC during follow-up to evaluate diagnostic capability of the MR signature. BC risk was calculated with MR score, Gail risk score, and both tests combined. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate these 3 models.
RESULTS: NanoString MR demonstrated concordance between fresh frozen and FFPE malignant samples (r = 0.99). Within the validation set, 563 women with benign breast biopsies from 2007 to 2011 were identified and followed for at least 5 y; 50 women developed BC (affected) within 5 y from biopsy. Three groups were compared: benign tissue from unaffected and affected patients and malignant tissue from affected patients. Kruskal-Wallis test suggested difference between the groups (P = 0.09) with trend in higher predicted MR score for benign tissue from affected patients before development of BC. Neither the MR signature nor Gail risk score were statistically different between affected and unaffected patients; combining both tests demonstrated best predictive value (AUC = 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: FFPE gene expression assays can be used to develop a predictive test for BC. Further investigation of the combined MR signature and Gail Model is required. Our assay was limited by scant cellularity of archived breast tissue.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Cancer risk; Gail Model; Gene expression; Gene signature; NanoString

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31419640      PMCID: PMC6900446          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  38 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jessica A Cintolo-Gonzalez; Danielle Braun; Amanda L Blackford; Emanuele Mazzola; Ahmet Acar; Jennifer K Plichta; Molly Griffin; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Rating the risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  J P Costantino; M H Gail; D Pee; S Anderson; C K Redmond; J Benichou; H S Wieand
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  BRCA1 sequence analysis in women at high risk for susceptibility mutations. Risk factor analysis and implications for genetic testing.

Authors:  D Shattuck-Eidens; A Oliphant; M McClure; C McBride; J Gupte; T Rubano; D Pruss; S V Tavtigian; D H Teng; N Adey; M Staebell; K Gumpper; R Lundstrom; M Hulick; M Kelly; J Holmen; B Lingenfelter; S Manley; F Fujimura; M Luce; B Ward; L Cannon-Albright; L Steele; K Offit; A Thomas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Proliferative genes dominate malignancy-risk gene signature in histologically-normal breast tissue.

Authors:  Dung-Tsa Chen; Aejaz Nasir; Aedin Culhane; Chinnambally Venkataramu; William Fulp; Renee Rubio; Tao Wang; Deepak Agrawal; Susan M McCarthy; Mike Gruidl; Gregory Bloom; Tove Anderson; Joe White; John Quackenbush; Timothy Yeatman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D Spiegelman; G A Colditz; D Hunter; E Hertzmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  T S Frank; S A Manley; O I Olopade; S Cummings; J E Garber; B Bernhardt; K Antman; D Russo; M E Wood; L Mullineau; C Isaacs; B Peshkin; S Buys; V Venne; P T Rowley; S Loader; K Offit; M Robson; H Hampel; D Brener; E P Winer; S Clark; B Weber; L C Strong; A Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Gene expression signatures of morphologically normal breast tissue identify basal-like tumors.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Svetlana Sadekova; Francois Pepin; Michael Hallett; Sarkis Meterissian; Fawaz Halwani; Karim Khetani; Margarita Souleimanova; Brent Zabolotny; Atilla Omeroglu; Morag Park
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions.

Authors:  A C Antoniou; A P Cunningham; J Peto; D G Evans; F Lalloo; S A Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; M C Southey; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; B Passini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; L Tryggvadottir; K Syrjakoski; O-P Kallioniemi; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; P D P Pharoah; D F Easton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Frequent mutated B2M, EZH2, IRF8, and TNFRSF14 in primary bone diffuse large B-cell lymphoma reflect a GCB phenotype.

Authors:  Ruben A L de Groen; Ronald van Eijk; Stefan Böhringer; Tom van Wezel; Richard Raghoo; Dina Ruano; Patty M Jansen; Inge Briaire-de Bruijn; Fleur A de Groot; Karin Kleiverda; Liane Te Boome; Valeska Terpstra; Henriette Levenga; Alina Nicolae; Eduardus F M Posthuma; Isabelle Focke-Snieders; Lizan Hardi; Wietske C E den Hartog; Lara H Bohmer; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Anke van den Berg; Arjan Diepstra; Marcel Nijland; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Marie José Kersten; Steven T Pals; Hendrik Veelken; Judith V M G Bovée; Arjen H G Cleven; Joost S P Vermaat
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-10-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.